misc.legal.moderated

> As of that moment, and not before or after, you are >legally married in the eyes of the law. >The state doesn't care if you go thru some religious ceremony, and/or >pledge your love to each other in some other way, or don't bother to do >any of th

"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote: > Crimson wrote: > >> State law also says that the "Marriage licenses are valid for >> 90 days from the date of issuance. If you do not get married >> within 90 days, the license will no longer be valid."

My 76-year-old mother tripped and fell on an upturned carpet in the entrance to our post office. She bruised her hip and head...no broken bones, thank God. An accident report was filed...a postal employee told her "you're the second person who's trippe

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:50:36 -0500, "Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote: >The landlord was undoubtedly operating on the following theory: the >tenants left all this stuff behind, it's now my stuff, I have no use >for any of this crap,

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:50:28 -0500 from <fredfighter@spamcop.net>: > There are laws for abandoned property that might apply to dumpster > diving, or not, but curbside property of evicted people is not likely > to be considered abandoned property. The

Timothy wrote: > Suzie-Q wrote: > > I have been know to remove a restorable item or two from my neighbor's > > trash on more than one occasion. Whenever I see unusual items in > > a neighbor's trash I'll go over and see if there's anything I can >

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:50:19 -0500, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote: >. . . . >An LLC does *not* protect you from tort liability. You are *always* >responsible for the things you did that you shoudn't've and the things >you should've done that y

fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote: >The salesman showed me a 'coverage' map that was a picture of the entire >United States with all of the states colored in to indicate service. I asked > him if the phone required line-of sight to a tower, he said no.

In article <35r222dj7gofki8mpf4acjs6v1l2ea2c0s@4ax.com>, <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote: > > >OB legal: > >If I had relied on what the saleman told me, would I have >a case for fraud? E.g. the contract did not guarantee >coverage but the salesm

In article <15r222hqpkehop48sdc7u3mutujsejvh5f@4ax.com>, <flamethrowingtroll@yahoo.com> wrote: >Robert Bonomi wrote: > >>*NEVER* sign something you "don't understand". > >This is becoming more difficult to do. I have a college degree from UC >Berk

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:50:06 -0500 from <flamethrowingtroll@yahoo.com>: > Anyway, it the sales rep verbally assured him of service, isn't that a > legally binding? (1) Even if it is, how can he prove the oral assurance was made? (2) But it's probabl

fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote: > If I had relied on what the saleman told me, would I have > a case for fraud? E.g. the contract did not guarantee > coverage but the salesman did . Not necessarily. But you'd certainly have a good cause for brea

flamethrowingtroll@yahoo.com wrote: > There's a theory that these contracts are deliberately > obfuscated using neat tricks like multiple dependent clauses, > statements that use terms that loop back to other definitions, > overly long sentences, an

In article <2j9902t56s3i01tc8oorul1gh90io0ee4i@4ax.com>, <knowyourights@gmail.com> wrote: >Does anybody have any info as to when the last time it was used >sucessfully in a court of law? This doesn't have to be limited to just >the state of WI. In

Gerald Clough <firstinitiallastname@texas.net> wrote: > Subsequent Texas case law, though, directs that jurors may make whatever > oath would be most binding on their conscience. O'Hare's federal suit in > a case in which the famous atheist was fou

Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote: >>"BoyntonStu" <stu@aaronj.com> wrote in message > [snip] >>> Has there ever been a prosecution fot not swearing the Juror Oath? >>> >>> (I do not mean failure to perform duties as a sworn Juror ie. Contempt) >>

In article <u4r222tita8142sds018p90mj84jfe9fsl@4ax.com>, the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm (Stan Brown) writes: | Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:39:45 -0500 from Antipodean Bucket Farmer | <usenet2006@THE-DOMAIN-IN.SIG>: | > Sounds to me like it would still be conte

Swearing an Oath. In your posts and some previous posts I could not see any connection between a Summons for Jury, failure to act as a Juror, avoiding Jury service and not swearing an Oath of Office (Juror). Is an elected President of the United S

p4o2 wrote: > Is there any way to deal with a judge that is making it difficult for a > person in court based on a past exerience (not legal). This is in New > York state. I am conserned that a formal complaint will make the > situation worse? Th

In article <m4r222hg2t2n21urevvib51hsn4cs8vcsl@4ax.com>, Mark A <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: ><pami1968@aol.com> wrote in message >news:opsv12910l9tmbesl29s77hcpn7k6vgdc5@4ax.com... >> I am the executor of my mother's estate and she has two >> bene

Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote: > In article <tfkg125t5hj8r5rlp1l1dvdqgffi1b82n7@4ax.com>, > <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote: >>> In article <a1s91298d9i67siep9f87jlpboimq8l0ic@4ax.com>, >>> <prabb

Antipodean Bucket Farmer <usenet2006@the-domain-in.sig> wrote: > In article <pmvo12plf7qhk614bvfm65gnqfhhotb5ob@4ax.com>, > jfc@mit.edu says... >> In article <tfkg125t5hj8r5rlp1l1dvdqgffi1b82n7@4ax.com>, >> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >> > >

John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu> wrote: > In article <tfkg125t5hj8r5rlp1l1dvdqgffi1b82n7@4ax.com>, > <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >> >>>> He did NOT indicate to the OP in any way (that was stated here) to >>>>run the stop sign. >> >>> When a police

Dane wrote: > "Bill" <gulfside@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1142712061.569541.146640@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > I'd like to know if there is any circumstance that would allow an email > > to stand as a legal request? Is there any case

In article <9psv12lesjleeq3s4ag58pupffrd305ahi@4ax.com>, spamtrap@sbcglobal.net says... > "maxborn555" <maxborn555@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Regarding the DoJ subpoena of google for Internet search data. > > > >>From where does the Executive branch

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:49:40 -0500, prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote: >Was this a jab at Louisiana or are they just notorious for having their own >way of doing things? Just curious. Louisiana law is a mixture of civil and common law. Their probate

prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote: > Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > But to be sure, you should check with a local estate planning lawyer, > > who can review your documents and let you know if they are valid in > > your new stat

In article <j4r222d8ufba4umgf5gq0j4ngcn35uthtr@4ax.com>, <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> But to be sure, you should check with a local estate planning lawyer, >> who can review your documen

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:49:40 -0500 from <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com>: > > > But to be sure, you should check with a local estate planning lawyer, > > who can review your documents and let you know if they are valid in > > your new state. This is parti

prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote: > Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote: <snipped> > > But to be sure, you should check with a local estate planning lawyer, > > who can review your documents and let you know if they are valid in >

prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote: >> But to be sure, you should check with a local estate planning >> lawyer, who can review your documents and let you know if they >> are valid in your new state. This is particularly important if >> one of the stat

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:49:38 -0500 from Tony <tony23 @dslextreme.WHATISTHIS.com>: > I missed the OP, but in the first quote I read of it, it said that "a > woman bought a lottery ticket in California". I'm pretty sure that > California is a community p

"Ted Banks" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote in message news:d0kc125kdgeneg2ptl2pg3tok0t2q52f97@4ax.com... >I am getting a divorce that will be finalized in a couple more months. > Everything has been agreed upon between myself and my wife, including > gener

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:49:35 -0500 from rick++ <rick303@hotmail.com>: > Every year I get a letter from Experian saying I am entitled to free > credit report because of the number of credit inquiries has > exceeded some threshhold. ?? You're entitled

In article <d4r222pk16dudpbhs6jl7pbtftdccsq60k@4ax.com>, Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>>Since he >>>got a mistrial in NJ, the

Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>>Since he >>>got a mistrial in NJ, the judge might even rule that he cannot >>>introduce evide

Every weekday morning, I park in my son's school neighborhood and walk him to his class...when I am doing this, someone is regularly 'keying' my car. I have tried to catch them on videotape running in the car, but so far no luck. I am thinking of hir

============================================================= Oral argument previews: Prepared by the liibulletin editorial board: < http://www.law.cornell.edu/bulletin/05board.htm > ============================================================= IMMIG