|
|
>I was setting up a
>joint checking account for my teenager, and was told by the credit union that
>he had to come in person to sign the application form.
There's a couple of practical issues aside from the whole "legally
binding" thing. #1, they n
|
|
|
In article <2aee22t0gtk5tp3jvo0k9b1nt1ckb8re1g@4ax.com>,
Nosmo King <Nosmo_King58_@_yahoo.com> wrote:
>When are signatures by minors considered legally binding ? I was setting up a
>joint checking account for my teenager, and was told by the credit u
|
|
|
Nosmo King wrote:
> When are signatures by minors considered legally binding ? I was setting up a
> joint checking account for my teenager, and was told by the credit union that
> he had to come in person to sign the application form. I asked why, as
|
|
|
What is a Citizen?
Is there a 'contract' between a Citizen and the State?
What are the duties/responsibilities of each?
|
|
|
Tony wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
> > Tony <tony23@dslextreme.WHATISTHIS.com> wrote:
> >
> >>You would think California would recognize common-law marriage.
> >>But they don't.
> >
> > California recognizes common-law marriages that were cre
|
|
|
Tony <tony23@dslextreme.WHATISTHIS.com> wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>> Tony <tony23@dslextreme.WHATISTHIS.com> wrote:
>>
>>>You would think California would recognize common-law marriage.
>>>But they don't.
>>
>> California recognizes com
|
|
|
What does the German court need in from the mother, or adult child, in
order to force an alledged biological father to undergo parternity
testing (DNA testing I presume)?
Does the German court normally always grant the request for testing and
issue
|
|
|
I'm self employed and have formed an LLC. If I do not have any partners, do
I still need to file a 1065?
--
www.cjpassociates.org
|
|
|
In article <8g9h22ldvmdfoq70n6dgqpehutenh4jstf@4ax.com>,
Carlos <brastras@terra.com.br> wrote:
>Any writing or timely submission of additional evidence by the
>claimant, his/her representative payee or his/her representative
>after receipt of notice
|
|
|
3 people, A, B and C, agree to set up a business. They each agree to
provide $55,000 start up capital in return for 550 shares in the
business - a third interest each. Subscription letters are signed and
stock issuance resolutions agreed and signed - b
|
|
|
I was recently caught shoplifting an item valued 30 dollars. I have a
court date coming up. how worried should i be about punishment? should
i get a public defender? any advice??
|
|
|
We are selling a product and have become aware that the
manufacturer/distributor is forwarding most (if not all) product
support inquires to our competitor instead of handling them "in house".
This competitor is then soliciting these customers for addi
|
|
|
I own 100% of the shares of an S-corporation. All purchases for goods
are made on the spot as customers buy them, however, credit card bills
aren't due for payment until the end of the month. In the meantime the
amount customers have paid sits idle in
|
|
|
LynchburgTimes@gmail.com wrote:
> Can somone please explain to me why the EPA refers to the Clean Water
> act with numbers such as 303(d); but the US code refers to the same
> section with numbers which do not correspond at all, such as TITLE 33 >
|
|
|
LynchburgTimes@gmail.com wrote:
> Can somone please explain to me why the EPA refers to the Clean Water
> act with numbers such as 303(d); but the US code refers to the same
> section with numbers which do not correspond at all, such as TITLE 33 >
>
|
|
|
LynchburgTimes@gmail.com wrote:
> Can somone please explain to me why the EPA refers to the Clean Water
> act with numbers such as 303(d); but the US code refers to the same
> section with numbers which do not correspond at all, such as TITLE 33 >
>
|
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, LynchburgTimes@gmail.com wrote:
> Can somone please explain to me why the EPA refers to the
> Clean Water act with numbers such as 303(d); but the US code
> refers to the same section with numbers which do not correspond
> at a
|
|
|
In article <7g9h22l0r0vodr4g2i6njvt5du0oariu23@4ax.com>,
<LynchburgTimes@gmail.com> wrote:
>Can somone please explain to me why the EPA refers to the Clean Water
>act with numbers such as 303(d); but the US code refers to the same
>section with numb
|
|
|
LynchburgTimes@gmail.com writes:
> Can somone please explain to me why the EPA refers to the Clean Water
> act with numbers such as 303(d); but the US code refers to the same
> section with numbers which do not correspond at all, such as TITLE 33 >
|
|
|
LynchburgTimes@gmail.com wrote:
> Can somone please explain to me why the EPA refers to the Clean
> Water act with numbers such as 303(d); but the US code refers to
> the same section with numbers which do not correspond at all,
> such as TITLE 33
|
|
|
Hi,
I live in the state of California. I pay child support via wage assignment.
I have never missed paying a C.S. payment. Currently, C.S. is collected
by the San Francisco County District Attorney's office and disbursed to
the custodial parent. In
|
|
|
OP is planning contract employment where his hours might be at risk for
up to 60 days and he is not sure of the company's reliability for
payment.
Bob,
Get a better contract or deal with someone you trust. If the "project"
is definite, get an ad
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:50:28 -0500 from <fredfighter@spamcop.net>:
>
> > There are laws for abandoned property that might apply to dumpster
> > diving, or not, but curbside property of evicted people is not likely
> > to be consid
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Jimbo <Jimbo@verizon.net> wrote:
>> I've had so many colleagues tell me if a New Jersey resident
>> travels to your office in Manhattan to have his will signed,
>> you're not practising in NJ wit
|
|
|
I intend to take the LSAT in a few month's time. Is there anyone who
took this exam recently to point me to the right direction in terms of
what review books I should get? I have the most recent Princeton Review
and not really feeling it.
Also, wher
|
|
|
David Ames <worldrecord@juno.com> wrote:
<Wife got a letter from an agency concerning a student loan that's allegedly
not hers. Poster wants to know what he can do about it.>
You can send them a "drop dead" letter such as:
==================
(D
|
|
|
maxborn555 <maxborn555@yahoo.com> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>>
>> Would a five-line sentence qualify as an "overly long [sentence]"? <innocent
>> look>
>>
> How about five *words*? "This contract is for service."
I was digging
|
|
|
> Everybody loves to whine about how complicated contracts are, and
> it's true that many of them are much harder to understand than they
> should be. But it's also true that a contract needs to be precise and
> unambiguous, and while that can be done
|
|
|
In article <49ee22pe9pn048ech653d8m0oa1o5ht9m3@4ax.com>,
maxborn555 <maxborn555@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>>
>> Would a five-line sentence qualify as an "overly long [sentence]"? <innocent
>> look>
>>
>
>How about five
|
|
|
In article <of9h22ttpcnidhu0sqm48l12p0n6sl2veg@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>I've just been reading /America's Constitution: A Biography/ by Akhil
>Reed Amar (2005). Apparently in the early years of operation of the
>Con
|
|
|
Earthlink wrote:
> my son receivd a notification for jury duty in my name. Howeer, i've been
> living out of the country for more than a year now.
>
> Am i excluded? How do i respond to the jury duty letter?
If you are on an extended leave (such
|
|
|
Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Earthlink wrote:
>> my son receivd a notification for jury duty in my name. Howeer, i've been
>> living out of the country for more than a year now.
>>
>> Am i excluded? How do i respond to the jury duty letter
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:55:20 -0500 from <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com>:
>> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> > Before you go around insulting people, check your facts. This is
>> > particular
|
|
|
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:59:16 -0500 from Ernie Klein
<ecklein@pacbell.net>:
> the oath (CA) which is posted on the www.courtinfo.ca.gov web
> site:
>
> "Do you, and each of you, understand and agree that you will well and
> truly try the cause now p
|
|
|
>From California:
Step 1: Selection of a Jury
When a jury trial is about to begin, the trial court judge requests a
panel of prospective jurors to be sent to the courtroom from the jury
assembly room so that the jury selection process can begin. Aft
|
|
|
"A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9f9h225kkmlfg2k6pd5d99523tvckfsvgr@4ax.com...
> [OP was twice banned from an AOL message board for posting messages
> allegedly "disruptive", and later, allegedly "off topic". He co
|
|
|
mrmunyan@aol.com <mrmunyan@aol.com> wrote:
<AOL is saying some posts of his are "off-topic" and/or "disruptive" on an
AOL chat board>
> Is there a name for this type of treatment?
Yes, it's known as "it's my ball and I'll take it home if I want to
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>>> First, the limit is $12,000, doubled if the giver or recipient
>>> (and quadrupled if both) is married.
>>
>> The
|
|
|
Timothy <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
[quote snipped]
>I was wondering about a side issue: the OP asked about suing the "John
>Doe" who told the head of the homeowners association about the kid with
>the silly string. But if John Doe was d
|
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:58:27 -0500, "Timothy"
<Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
>But if John Doe was defaming him, wasn't the head of
>the association arguably defaming him as well?
I'm not sure there's a good answer to that, because as I s
|
|
|
Scott Hedrick wrote:
> >So, unless
> > I get contrary advice, I believe it will be best to give it to my daughter
> > and let her fill out the name and address and claim the winnings. Of
> > course,
> > at the time I give her the ticket I will wink
|
|
|
Ted wrote:
> "Scott Hedrick" <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:q7ee22hdl6182eul8bbeqbflencuuau5dr@4ax.com...
>
> > The point is, it's fraud. Moreover, it may also cause a great deal of tax
> > problems. After all, if you treat
|
|
|
Ted <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote:
>I am getting conflicting advice from different sources. One person tells me
>that I do not actually own the winnings from the lottery ticket just because
>I bought it, but only after I have filled out and signed the bac
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:49:38 -0500 from Tony <tony23
> @dslextreme.WHATISTHIS.com>:
>> I missed the OP, but in the first quote I read of it, it said that "a
>> woman bought a lottery ticket in California". I'm pretty sure that
>> C
|
|
|
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:58:18 -0500 from Ted <dwzimm@telus.net>:
> I am getting conflicting advice from different sources.
(on your scheme to commit fraud, and possibly tax evasion as well, by
having your daughter claim your winning lottery ticket is he
|
|
|
In article <r7ee22l9vu28t7env73t05saoa776fu0p8@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:07:41 -0500 from Don <dwzimm@telus.net>:
>> The ticket has a
>> place on the back where you sign your name and give your add
|
|
|
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:58:18 -0500, "Ted" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote:
>I am getting conflicting advice from different sources. One person tells me
>that I do not actually own the winnings from the lottery ticket just because
>I bought it, but only af
|
|
|
"Ted" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote:
> I am getting conflicting advice from different sources. One
> person tells me that I do not actually own the winnings from the
> lottery ticket just because I bought it, but only after I have
> filled out and signed
|
|
|
nirak2k22000@yahoo.com wrote:
> I have high liability limits under my California auto insurance policy
> ($500/500/100), but I'm wondering if they are too high. IOW, I'm not
> sure how "suable" I am. These are some of the facts about my "assets":
|
|
|
nirak2k22000@yahoo.com wrote:
> I have a few questions about my net worth and how it relates to my
> liklihood of being sued in the event of an auto accident.
> I have high liability limits under my California auto insurance policy
> ($500/500/100),
|
|
