|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
>If you're saying here what I think you're saying, you're admitting that
>they made an overpayment, and that it was by mistake. It doesn't
>matter whose fault the overpayment was, the real questi
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
>
> That's why Seth is asking whether you gave them any additional evidence
> about the MERITS OF THE CASE in your letter requests for
> reconsideration. That is, did you tell them why you believe you do
> NOT in fact owe them a
|
|
|
<Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ov9832dkuptrl06p4so69pb68lo8n7flg6@4ax.com...
> paltema@gmail.com, assuming arguendo the truth of the charge against
> him, wrote:
>> I was recently caught shoplifting an item valued 30 dollars. I hav
|
|
|
Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com wrote:
> paltema@gmail.com, assuming arguendo the truth of the charge against
> him, wrote:
>
>>I was recently caught shoplifting an item valued 30 dollars. I have a
>>court date coming up. how worried should i be about punishm
|
|
|
Denise
You wrote:
> (Denise) I thought a lawyer could help because I was told by someone at
> the Better Business Bureau to ask an attorney about this.
While I'm not sure why the BBB advised you to seek legal advice to help
your friend
|
|
|
Hi all
I have a roommate and his ex girlfriend is a psycho in a way. She still
likes to come and fight with my roommate. My roommate is a weak guy
with no guts and the girl kept bothering him. I don't really care about
the guy, but this girl always
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:08:28 -0500 from <fredfighter@spamcop.net>:
> >
> > Stan Brown wrote:
> > > Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:50:28 -0500 from <fredfighter@spamcop.net>:
> > > > There are laws for abandoned property that might apply to
|
|
|
In copyright infringement action of artist painter against publisher,
for the cause of ripped off copyrights (fraudulent copyright notices
showing the publisher as owner of the artists copyright), the publisher
by attorney repeatedly admitted in Feder
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> David Ames <worldrecord@juno.com> wrote:
>
> <Wife got a letter from an agency concerning a student loan that's allegedly
> not hers. Poster wants to know what he can do about it.>
>
> You can send them a "drop de
|
|
|
OP:
"I am wondering if unpaid spousal support will ever go away. "
Not really. It is a Court Order. At least in California, support
orders, pursuant to family law, have no statute of limitations that I
know of.
L. Lake
|
|
|
Timothy <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
>Predictably, Rush Limbaugh weighed in on the side of the Duke lacrosse
>players who have been accused of gang-raping a student from a
>neighboring college who they had hired as an exotic dancer.
[s
|
|
|
On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:28:49 -0400, "Timothy"
<Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
>[Rush Limbaugh accuses Al Sharpton of involvement in the
>Duke lacrosse scandal. OP wants to know when the
>statements in question become defamatory.]
For
|
|
|
In article <kv9832pii85b5ee7ecen8t9ciqdkltd6d0@4ax.com>,
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> Obviously, Sharpton (like Limbaugh) is a controversial public figure
> and hence has less protection from defamation than an ordinary citiz
|
|
|
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote in message
news:kv9832pii85b5ee7ecen8t9ciqdkltd6d0@4ax.com...
> Predictably, Rush Limbaugh weighed in on the side of the Duke lacrosse
> players who have been accused of gang-raping a student from a
|
|
|
Shawn <shivanishah_2004@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I bought a condo in Boston. When we saw it for the first time, the
> seller's agent showed us the place and the tandem parking. The
> parking had 3 garbage bins on the side. The garbage bins have garbage
> f
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>> If you don't file a gift tax return, that's correct. But you
>>> can do a gift split, which means th
|
|
|
In article <vgo522dd8je1usc55el830svfqisv2mc56@4ax.com>,
<prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>> In article <tfkg125t5hj8r5rlp1l1dvdqgffi1b82n7@4ax.com>,
>> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>>Seth Breidbart <
|
|
|
"Zarlot" <Zarloth@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fv98321hovotd6rm2s7mrbgfriu65vva0q@4ax.com...
> I'd say the chances of me getting fired within the next couple of weeks
> is fairly high. However, there's a clause in my contract that says
> that if
|
|
|
In article <fv98321hovotd6rm2s7mrbgfriu65vva0q@4ax.com>,
"Zarlot" <Zarloth@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'd say the chances of me getting fired within the next couple of weeks
> is fairly high. However, there's a clause in my contract that says
> that if I
|
|
|
Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:28:38 -0400 from <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com>:
> Could it possibly be argued that the value
> of the ticket is only $1 (or what-ever the price of it) until/unless he
> actually cashes it in?
No. It's _known_ to be a winning ticket
|
|
|
In article <dv98321a85ofmo3asi12h5ifk0c0v9t07d@4ax.com>,
<prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>I just thought about something. Could it possibly be argued that the value
>of the ticket is only $1 (or what-ever the price of it) until/unless he
>actuall
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> I just thought about something. Could it possibly be argued that
> the value of the ticket is only $1 (or what-ever the price of
> it) until/unless he actually cashes it in? Thus he could give
> her $0.50 and hold i
|
|
|
My godmother passed away recently in Alameda County, California. I am
pretty sure that she has left me something (she had mentioned jewelry).
Her cousin is the executor of the wil. She has many children, who are
rather untrustworthy. What is to prevent
|
|
|
In article <av9832lbpn1dfhfp5e3r7aqll594l4kobj@4ax.com>,
Annie <silkart@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>I would like to know what legal recourse I have if I have discovered my
>copyrighted artwork on a clipart disc that has been included on
>multiple versions
|
|
|
On 5 Apr 2006, "Annie" <silkart@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>I would like to know what legal recourse I have if I have discovered my
>copyrighted artwork on a clipart disc that has been included on
>multiple versions of software sold worldwide over a 3 yea
|
|
|
On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:28:32 -0400, "Annie" <silkart@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>I would like to know what legal recourse I have...
(She sold artwork to a greeting card company under an agreement that
authorized use for cards only. The greeting card c
|
|
|
Dear Legal Group ! here is something to laugh, but for sure Law
related.
The confused Judge from Hell, performed by Jamie Kennedy in a People's
Court like setting. Plaintiff and Defendant were unaware of this spoof.
My judgment is hilarious and very a
|
|
|
Okay, here's a situation I'd like to know if the verbal / written
agreement is "legal" & would hold up in a court of law.
Person A owns a company, an S-corp.
Person A writes on a piece of paper & signs that person B owns 50% of
the company.
Person
|
|
|
Pain Man,
Your "friend" has legal custody of two children to whom she's not
related. You want to know what her chance is of keeping legal custody
if the mother tries to get them back.
My answer is that without an attorney her chances are problem
|
|
|
In article <6v9832pfe03ib74sln0eugrs6ggd4ehvop@4ax.com>,
PainMan2001 <i_will_win_this_week@yahoo.com> wrote:
>My question is, what are her chances of keeping custody of these kids
>if the mother decides to go to court to get them back?
Who has the
|
|
|
Hello!
I was in a minor car accident about 4 weeks ago.
I still have to fill out the 'Accident Report' for my Insurance
Company. Meanwhile I have made a verbal report over the phone, received
a policy number and approval to get my car repaired. I
|
|
|
"A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> The comment to UCC 9-203 explains this as a statute of frauds
> concern:
>
> "3. Security Agreement; Authentication. Under subsection (b)(3),
> enforceability requires the debtor's security a
|
|
|
bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>Nothing about a signature.
>>
>>Under section 9-203(2)(c)(i) the debtor must have
>>"authenticated" a security agreement.
>
> I think you would need some "e
|
|
|
berry@ix.netcom.com (berry) wrote:
> "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> When I say "titled jointly" --- titled is - "spouse and spouse"
> (using both our names.) No joint tenancy mentioned. Correct in
> my assumption of communi
|
|
