|
|
Is thre a place where one could find and download amicus briefs for
cases
currently before, or recently decided by, the USSC?
--
FF
|
|
|
What constitutes "1st use in commerce" regarding trademark protection.
I own several domain names for a few startup companies I am creating
this summer, and will be creating logos for each soon, that I would
like trademark protection for - as well as p
|
|
|
I am creating a startup company this summer on my own time, with my own
resources. I also work for a large consulting company and am worried
the company might claim my ideas as its own.
Can my company claim my ideas / work as its own *if* the ideas /
|
|
|
katrinapeker@yahoo.com wrote:
> [ In copyright infringement action, defendant's lawyer
> said in pretrial conferences that defendant's copyright
> notices on the works in contention was wrong and that
> "[t]o avoid further violation" all disputed pr
|
|
|
Mr.Mike Jacobs wrote:
>agreed to destroy the allegedly infringing materials
>without admission of fault
>without finding of fault
>did not tie them down forever to an admission that they infringed
I timely registered, never sold, never transfered m
|
|
|
In article <43nm32d26b50o67ra5t0ojscdd8m4l8uin@4ax.com>,
the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm says...
>
>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:51:18 -0400 from <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com>:
>> In misc.legal.moderated Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> > Sun, 02 A
|
|
|
cowartmisc1@yahoo.com wrote:
> <<But what about day to day usage where you might scroll through a
> copyrighted document say?>>
>
> As a general rule, copyrighted items found on websites may not be
> copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted,
|
|
|
cowartmisc1@yahoo.com wrote:
> <<But what about day to day usage where you might scroll through a
> copyrighted document say?>>
>
> As a general rule, copyrighted items found on websites may not be
> copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted,
|
|
|
John A. Weeks III wrote:
> In article <uioj32phmekder7a0goqqtf35dtgt3alk1@4ax.com>,
> flimflam998@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> 1) The landlord never gave me a receipt indicating the bank account
>> that the security deposit was deposited in.
>
> Are yo
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>You got an e-mail from your landlord letting you out of your lease.
>Now your landlord has not returned your security deposit, and
>furthermore is threatening to sue for unpaid rent. You want to know
|
|
|
John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com> wrote:
> In article <uioj32phmekder7a0goqqtf35dtgt3alk1@4ax.com>,
> flimflam998@gmail.com wrote:
>> 1) The landlord never gave me a receipt indicating the bank account
>> that the security deposit was deposite
|
|
|
"John A. Weeks III" <john@johnweeks.com> writes:
> In article <uioj32phmekder7a0goqqtf35dtgt3alk1@4ax.com>,
> flimflam998@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > 1) The landlord never gave me a receipt indicating the bank account
> > that the security deposit was
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>> Actually no, you cannot give a gift to one person with the
>>> understanding that he will give it to
|
|
|
John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com> wrote:
> In article <rioj32lc7osa60enesj17r7q5jic4c3kd7@4ax.com>,
> johnmolinda@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Now if we formally dispute this bill with the landlord can he still
>> send a collection agency after us whil
|
|
|
On the day of a suicide a will was
found stating His name being of sound mind and body leaves all his
worldly possessions to his wife, her name dates and signs it. No other
will or beneficiaries can be located. This is called a holographic will
and va
|
|
|
>carpediem wrote:
>[rear ended a guy. says it's not his fault]
[snip]
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>The police there gave a ticket based on his sizing up the crash
>including the witness statements. You do have the oppo
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> That won't stop the other foax who were in the crash with you from
> bringing insurance claims against you, or keep you from being sued if
> your insurance company won't settle with them. From your descript
|
|
|
We are for the first time getting ready to draw up will etc for the
sake of our children. To be honest, I don't know where to start. We
will use the services of a lawyer but we'd rather not go without
knowing what to ask for.
Is there a book that gi
|
|
|
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 08:48:25 -0400, "louika@juno.com"
<louika@juno.com> wrote:
>Her cousin is the executor of the wil. She has many children, who are
>rather untrustworthy. What is to prevent the executor from going to the
>house and cleaning out what
|
|
|
What is to prevent the executor from going to the
house and cleaning out whatever they wish?
As a practical matter, nothing. Your best protection is to be there
first. I have seen estates ripped off by scum relatives, County
Conservators and other
|
|
|
In article <b2nm32lahde64d9oeasckcrucue0ab2f1k@4ax.com>,
"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> In California wills are required to be lodged with the county clerk
> whether probate is filed or not, within thirty days after the
|
|
|
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:36:53 -0400, Tony
<tony23@dslextreme.WHATISTHIS.com> wrote:
>As a specific example - last year, for a few months, on my way to work,
>I regularly entered the freeway using the carpool lane, even though I
>was alone in my car
|
|
|
Donna wrote:
> The Publishing Law Center says that "a parody exists when one
> imitates a serious piece of work, such as literature, music or
> artwork, for a humorous or satirical effect."
>
> Does a parody exist if one imitates an UNserious piece o
|
|
|
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:36:51 -0400, "Stuart A. Bronstein"
<spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Parodies are generally protected and satire is often not. I don't
>think a parody is only protected if you are making fun of a serious
>work.
Can you ex
|
|
|
anon_correo@hotmail.com wrote:
[OP's friend sold a car without a written contract. Title remained in
the seller. The buyer stopped making payments and has repudiated the
contract. OP wants to know if the seller can repossess the car.]
At common
|
|
|
anon_correo@hotmail.com wrote:
> I'm writing this for a friend. He sold a car to a "friend". There was
> no contract written up of any kind. Friend took physical possesion of
> the car and agreed to make monthly payments until the car was paid off.
|
|
|
anon_correo@hotmail.com wrote:
> I'm writing this for a friend. He sold a car to a "friend". There was
> no contract written up of any kind. Friend took physical possesion of
> the car and agreed to make monthly payments until the car was paid off.
>
|
|
|
In article <12nm32dmcsgnl548ud8tg0anhtva6cgku4@4ax.com>,
anon_correo@hotmail.com wrote:
> Can the seller, leagally, take the car back and wait until the buyer
> makes the rest of the payments?
You have to be careful here...you cannot simply take
|
|
|
In May 2005 I bought a house in NJ. During the process I had a home
inspection performed. One the items I specifically asked the inspector
to check for was the presence of aluminum wirinng, unfortunately I did
not ask him to check for it in writing.
|
|
|
|
|