|
|
In article <6o7752hohbvupqae5v08hntckkirdsgt4c@4ax.com>,
whburling@earthlink.net says...
>
>
> context:
> two independent people, A and B
>
> Person A owns a house with bank.
> Person A lives in house in CT.
>
> Person B owns a house.
> Pe
|
|
|
>A situation in a senior citizen's highrise, HUD subsidized building,
>was brought to my attention and my opinion on the legality of it
>sought. Although I did form the opinion that there was descrimination
>involved, I'm not qualified to have a legal
|
|
|
katrinapeker@yahoo.com writes:
> Judge C.,we acknowledged that the copyrights as they were put on there
> were improper and we agreed to change them. ---We agreed at that time
> to make the modification you have seen, crossing off the improper
> cop
|
|
|
katrinapeker@yahoo.com wrote:
> Both defendant publisher and his attorney admitted in 1993 that
> the publisher wholly without authorization, knowingly and
> willfully, for commercial advantage and private financial gain,
> reproduced and distribute
|
|
|
In article <sqod52lct2fh31p0ieptbcf0dn3jr57phj@4ax.com>,
<katrinapeker@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Mr.Seth Breidbart wrote:
>>Misleading is legal. Everybody who disagrees with a verdict believes the court must have been mislead (at best).
>
>With your genera
|
|
|
In article <7jp1521q87soul8i2iqn38iqeufmbsa238@4ax.com>,
<katrinapeker@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Mr.Seth Breidbart wrote:
>>If I buy a book by Stephen King and white out the copyright notice and write in a copyright claim by me, I`m not violating
>his copyr
|
|
|
As a judgment creditor, I first restrained the debtors bank accounts. By
phone, the bank's legal department told me on three spearate dates that the
accounts were restrained. The debtor called me to complain that they were
restrained and said there
|
|
|
[Fact-checking /Boston Public/, Stan Brown asked
whether Amercian citizens need to show ID yet.]
Stan, you will want to take a look at the Hiibel case. Wiki has a good
summary:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiibel_v._Sixth_Judicial_District_Court_of
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> My understanding was that Americans are not yet required to carry
> identification. This week's /Boston Public/ featured a guy who was
> arrested because he was "acting suspiciously" (looking at houses in a
> white neighborhood at
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> (1) Do we have to show ID to a copy, legally, on request? (I'm aware
> that as a practical matter it may be smart to do so even if not
> required, but I'm asking about the law.)
We chewed this over mightily in a TX specific
|
|
|
In article <qqod52p3uh4d8fefkd3rk8gof953v4opm6@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>My understanding was that Americans are not yet required to carry
>identification. This week's /Boston Public/ featured a guy who was
>arrested
|
|
|
> My wife came home last night and said she feels very awkward and
> uncomfortable now and that when he finds out that she did not
> contribute what he considered acceptable, she could face some indirect
> negative consequences as he runs the departmen
|
|
|
Rich asserts:
> [Wife, a senior associate with a law firm in
> Washington, DC was bluntly told by the head
> of her group to donate over $10K to Stanford.]
Rich, I assume you've changed some details to protect the guilty. I
presume your wife would
|
|
|
Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote:
> On 29-Apr-2006, "A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Presently, Michigan is the only state in which drug companies are
> > immune from civil liability for deaths and injuries caused by
> > FDA-app
|
|
|
In article <4n7752hu8sg0i5ad27dm8t7cabbmkggeo2@4ax.com>,
amanda <amanda772007@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Just as I thought. can she file a compliant based on the fact that the
>woman was not supposed to call her hubby and that she needs to see
>whether the
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <32bf4298poc04fffhiv504gqhq7lcvk2oo@4ax.com>,
> Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >The witnesses would come into court and testify, live in court
> >and subject to cross-examination, to what they actuall
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
>> But if push comes to shove, and the only way to resolve the
>> dispute is formal litigation, the rules of evidence require that
>> the party wanting to offer evi
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:16:15 -0400 from Mike Jacobs
> <mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
> > But if push comes to shove, and the only way to resolve the dispute
> > is formal litigation, the rules of evidence require that the party
> > wanting
|
|
|
Dr. Yattz wrote:
> My arrangement with my landlord renting a house in Atlanta Georgia has
> been a good one until now. The lot behind us is about to be bulldozed
> for beginning construction, and I want to move. I gave him 30 days
> notice to termin
|
|
|
"Dr. Yattz" <winwinsit@hotmail.com> writes:
> My arrangement with my landlord renting a house in Atlanta Georgia has
> been a good one until now. The lot behind us is about to be bulldozed
> for beginning construction, and I want to move. I gave hi
|
|
|
In article <1qod5256olo7eit0rssg640919n7hvfl1u@4ax.com>,
Dr. Yattz <winwinsit@hotmail.com> wrote:
>My arrangement with my landlord renting a house in Atlanta Georgia has
>been a good one until now. The lot behind us is about to be bulldozed
>for begi
|
|
|
Mark A wrote:
> In a real estate transaction, buyer makes written offer to purchase a home.
> Then seller verbally submits a counter-off (through the agent).
>
> Since verbal offers are not binding for real estate transactions, does the
> verbal co
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com>:
>> Oral contracts for the sale of
>> real estate are not void, just unenforceable.
>
> They may be void, not just unenforceable, by statute. For exampl
|
|
|
Mark A wrote:
> "Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:im7752t551f8k2eeobk574l91mehgvm47h@4ax.com...
> > Showing that you already know enough law to be clever and possibly get
> > yourself in trouble. A little knowledge is a da
|
|
|
persspolice@gmail.com wrote:
> Greetings-
> I am a graduate student in Information Systems and work full time
> with a sick mother. Recently I decided to use my tax return money to
> renovate my home in Northern VA area. This was a month ago. N
|
|
|
<persspolice@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:qpod52pdloqnrn3ldt1eumta853ga1o8v7@4ax.com...
>I can not go to
> small claims court as the amount if more than the limit for small
> claims.
But you *can*- however, you may have to give up part of yo
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> Crusader george wrote:
>> I was stopped yesterday by the city police in Arcata,CA. Seems that a
>> particular LEO thought
>> I was in violation of the city park's law against riding your bike,
>> skateboard
|
|
|
<madhurireddy2005@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:opod52h2etgttpl3vnu3e0b076h4n3q59q@4ax.com...
>I am member of an LLC business. We are 5 Investors. I wanted to know
> what process do I need to follow to come out of an LLC? The business
> will conti
|
|
|
brettharlow123@gmail.com wrote:
> "it depends," sure, but what are common reasons, and do they courts
> allow?
I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing. "Extradition" is a
process whereby one _state_ (or sovereign nation) can request that a
|
|
|
I.E.Z. wrote:
> "Lance Mannion" <a@a.net> wrote in message
> news:2kp1521q9iiqqiq30ovru7g1r68gan3irl@4ax.com...
> > Hello - will a state misdemeanor show up on an FBI background check?
> > Will it still be there if i get my state record sealed? Than
|
|
|
Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:17:36 -0400 from <whburling@earthlink.net>:
(B sells a house in MA and uses the money to pay off the mortgage on
A's house in CT)
> Persons A and B eventually create a co-ownership deed and live in house
> previously owned by
|
|
|
I am not a lawyer.
>context:
>two independent people, A and B
>
>Person A owns a house with bank.
>Person A lives in house in CT.
>
>Person B owns a house.
>Person B lives in house in MA.
>Person B sells his home
>
>With house B proceeds, per
|
|
|
Situation: property next to mine has a small house on it with a septic
system. Owner of that house rents it out.
The county is telling the owner that he has to get rid of the septic
system because it violates laws. Homeowner can't connect directly to
|
|
|
A situation in a senior citizen's highrise, HUD subsidized building,
was brought to my attention and my opinion on the legality of it
sought. Although I did form the opinion that there was descrimination
involved, I'm not qualified to have a legal one
|
|
|
Bob wrote:
> I went bankrupt and the case was closed at the end of March. Now I own
> a condo and have around $40k in equity that I want to keep from
> getting taken if a disaster occurs.
>
> Do I need to transfer ownership to my son....what's the
|
|
|
In article <qn77521muk3r1i8inbo47ccqm27s6fcq8e@4ax.com>,
"Bob" <Go1369@Yahoo.Com> wrote:
> I went bankrupt and the case was closed at the end of March. Now I own
> a condo and have around $40k in equity that I want to keep from
> getting taken if
|
|
|
"Bob" <Go1369@Yahoo.Com> wrote:
> I went bankrupt and the case was closed at the end of March. Now
> I own a condo and have around $40k in equity that I want to
> keep from getting taken if a disaster occurs.
It depends on the laws of the state w
|
|
|
Mr.Seth Breidbart wrote:
>Misleading is legal. Everybody who disagrees with a verdict believes the court must have been mislead (at best).
With your generalized statement you avoided the issue in my previous
posting dated April 27th 2006.
Both def
|
|
|
My understanding was that Americans are not yet required to carry
identification. This week's /Boston Public/ featured a guy who was
arrested because he was "acting suspiciously" (looking at houses in a
white neighborhood at nigh, he being black) an
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:17:07 -0400, "Rich" <ambrose3202@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>[Associate receives e-mail from group head indicating expectation
>that associate will contribute substantially to university endowment
>drive.]
This might be worth disc
|
|
|
Rich,
Your wife, an attorney with a large law firm, was approached by her
supervisor and requested to donate a large sum to a university. It's not
clear what you wife's relationship is with the university or whether she
donated any money but s
|
|
|
===
[Revised 1 August 2005]
MISC.LEGAL.MODERATED POSTING INSTRUCTIONS
1. Posting should be done in the ordinary manner by using news
software. DO NOT MAIL POSTINGS TO THE MODERATOR. If you can't post using news
softw
|
|
|
On 29-Apr-2006, "A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Presently, Michigan is the only state in which drug companies are
> immune from civil liability for deaths and injuries caused by
> FDA-approved drugs. However, the Michigan leg
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:11:47 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
wrote:
>In article <qapk42h14lgcf5ofdglucjqrf7521msm6g@4ax.com>,
>Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
>>No, I didn't dispute that would be slander per se (and this
|
|
|
"Al" <allegal1651@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm interested in starting a temporary employment agency.
>
> Is there some sort of standard contract available somewhere that
> would allow me to approach corporate clients and offer myself as
> a self-employe
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <1i0t421ldunctcbrq3tgocdmghf4clf4ij@4ax.com>,
> amanda <amanda772007@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Anyway, he consistently lied to her and after switching the cell phone
> >number, she thought they were not in contact on
|
|
|
"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> A Michigan Attorney wrote:
>
>> In order to obtain a court order of any kind, a case must be
>> commenced in the court. This is typically done by filing a
>> complaint or petition
>
> Agreed. But s
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
In article <3n7752l2ip1iqajdd9sv8u5rgtincvmdel@4ax.com>,
<Not@Valid.net> wrote:
>Should I pursue legally against this major corporation for calling the
>police on me without justification?
How do you know they're the ones who did it?
Making in
|
