misc.legal.moderated

sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: > >>Inability to perform through voluntary action is a whole other >>matter. That's what is known as breach of the covenant of good >>faith and fair dealing

Kevin Haddock <kml@n-dex.com> wrote: > darrellmak@yahoo.com writes: >> The seller described the car in the eBay listing as having the >> top-of-the-line trim package, when in fact, I have just confirmed >> with the manufacturer that the car only has

J C P wrote: > I have a lady friend who was injured while a passenger > on a motorcycle. The injury necessitated surgery for > repair of a torn tendon in her hand and the rehab and > recovery period - from time of surgery until full release > by t

Tue, 30 May 2006 07:55:28 -0400 from J C P <JCP1STatADAMSdotNET@news.ipswitch.com>: (a friend was seriously injured in a motorcycle accident) > She asked me for advice and I have > absolutely no idea what she should settle for. > Any suggestions o

J C P wrote: [wants to know how much to ask for pain and suffering] > > Any suggestions on settlement amount and/or directions to > a site where such info can be found will be appreciated. > The value of pain and suffering, or how much you can pro

J C P <JCP1STatADAMSdotNET@news.ipswitch.com> wrote: >I have a lady friend who was injured while a passenger >on a motorcycle. The injury necessitated surgery for >repair of a torn tendon in her hand and the rehab and >recovery period - from time of

Mr.Seth Breidbart wrote: >Did he *actually authorize*---? Yes. In May 1992, one year before I filed the action index No. SDNY93-2171 for ripped off copyrights, defendant publisher`s licensee Masters Collection sold oil replicas of my work, according

Seth Breidbart wrote: > In article <5fbt52hksvo2r0hmob3qkktrscad13ev3o@4ax.com>, > <katrinapeker@yahoo.com> wrote: > >Mr.Seth Breidbart wrote: (s.misc.legal.moderated) > >>But those copies were produced under license, weren`t they? > >Mr.Stuart Br

Stuart A. Bronstein wrote: > Tony <tony23@dslextreme.WHATISTHIS.com> wrote: > >>Timothy wrote: > >>>Likewise not paying a debt isn't necessarily fraud--- unless >>>your actions meet the definition of fraud, which covers many of >>>the ways you co

john31415926@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry if this is a little odd, but I am in need of finding a legal > binding contract that says two people will be married by a particular > date (or something equivalent). Is there any such contract that is like > this

john31415926@gmail.com wrote: > me and my future wife want to take a break from each > other, however, I want to ensure that she will be with me after the > break. Don't ask about the history, it's a long story. She is accepting > and willing to sign

In article <fico72ttu7tqt7ectuj1keqv0ikqgvhdn0@4ax.com>, <john31415926@gmail.com> wrote: >Sorry if this is a little odd, but I am in need of finding a legal >binding contract that says two people will be married by a particular >date (or something eq

<<Sorry if this is a little odd, but I am in need of finding a legal binding contract that says two people will be married by a particular date (or something equivalent). Is there any such contract that is like this? >> No. There is no legal way

john31415926@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry if this is a little odd, but I am in need of finding a legal > binding contract that says two people will be married by a > particular date (or something equivalent). Is there any such > contract that is like th

<john31415926@gmail.com> wrote in message news:fico72ttu7tqt7ectuj1keqv0ikqgvhdn0@4ax.com... > Sorry if this is a little odd, but I am in need of finding a legal > binding contract that says two people will be married by a particular > date (or somet

[john31415926@gmail.com wonders about the validity of a promise to marry.] Depends on where you are. In the US, "Breach of Promise to Marry" was a common law action but it has expressly been forbidden in most states. In layman's terms, you can si

sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >>But if they do business in Raleigh, that town can still insist >>that they get a license from them. > > What's the definition of "do business in Raleigh

In article <cico72ht1f1v1n8njut9p706b7pdqsla47@4ax.com>, Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote: >Party A leases party B a parcel of land with an Option to Buy in 10 >years. Party B pays A some amount for the option to buy at a fixed >price at the

Network Admin wrote: > Party A leases party B a parcel of land with an Option to Buy in 10 > years. Party B pays A some amount for the option to buy at a fixed > price at the end of 10 years. > > In the mean time, a local government decides urban

Network Admin wrote: [B leases Whiteacre from A with option to buy at end of lease. Whiteacre is seized through exercise of eminent domain. Network Admin wonders what interest B holds in Whiteacre.] In a nutshell: After the condemnation, B has nothi

Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote: >Sat, 27 May 2006 14:17:16 -0400 from Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>: >> Another way of looking at it, however, is that the Constitution is a >> contract between the Federal Government and the States, > >I

-------------------------------------------------------------- AN E-BULLETIN LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL lii.law.cornell.edu -------------------------------------------------

Tue, 30 May 2006 07:55:06 -0400 from JB <highlinex@yahoo.com>: > The lady who lives with me rents her house and evicted her tenants for > non-payment in the year 2001. They left every room plus the garage packed > with possessions. ... I retained

Kevin Haddock mused in part: > [I] find it interesting that Weird Al Yankovic always > gets permission from the copyright holder before he > will even parody a song! Most of Weird Al's creations are derivative works and I suspect few of them would

>Bernie Cosell <bernie@fantasyfarm.com> wrote: > >> A friend was chatting with a >> member of one of these bands and asked why they hadn't come out >> with a CD, and the answer was that they don't have permission. >> Their claim [and apparently the

In article <lhco725hn08h5f8ocscqjedvoo5cs5j0nj@4ax.com>, Paul <paul@justice.com> wrote: >Do ALL pleadings in California have that double verticle line ("racing >stripe") down the left side of the page, with the column of numbers? > >Is it a law, or

Paul <paul@justice.com> wrote: > Do ALL pleadings in California have that double verticle line ("racing > stripe") down the left side of the page, with the column of numbers? > Is it a law, or rule? > If so, what is the point? Not sure what yo

Paul <paul@justice.com> wrote: > Do ALL pleadings in California have that double verticle line > ("racing stripe") down the left side of the page, with the column > of numbers? In trial courts, always that I've ever seen. > Is it a law, or rul

Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: > In article <utt872t3c81ckpnfekspevu5rm3tf0u3mq@4ax.com>, > Crusader george <georgek@humboldt1.com> wrote: >>I have a California driver's license question; >>I was stopped by the CHP yesterday and

Kevin Haddock wrote: > Hey, I was wondering if any of you experts out there knew if the new > mandatory 180 day credit counseling applied to persons who were > involuntarily put into bankruptcy by their creditors? > From J. K. Lassar's The New

In article <fhco72h31od32uiekiggjkk95r9o92ils0@4ax.com>, vic gate <gate000@gmail.com> wrote: >Hello I send some important papers by POSTMART What is "POSTMART"? As far as I can tell, it's a private company. > (certified mail) and >they got lost