|
|
In article <3c5u72h6c36aforjec0g3ib04f69dp9t67@4ax.com>,
<prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>> In article <4o5h72ljgb50jqo203kivnnia11ge5r52b@4ax.com>,
>> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com>
|
|
|
In article <3c5u72h6c36aforjec0g3ib04f69dp9t67@4ax.com>,
<prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>If the email was sent via gmail's servers then they could show that it was
>sent. That wouldn't prove it was recieved on the other end,
gmail's logs would
|
|
|
On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
know."
According to my understanding, in a bench trial, the judge determines
the facts. How does a judge determin
|
|
|
Hello,
Here's the deal.. I got into a car accident and the other party was
liable. The insurance co. deemed my car a total loss and I accepted the
amount they valued for my car. Now I bought a used car to replace my
totaled car and am now needing to
|
|
|
"Alberto Martinez" <almillermtz@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vfbt52t79vq426s5rrc8j8uj8gfuhm29p5@4ax.com...
> When someone has won a structured settlement that has arisen from a
> lawsuit, they expect they will have to wait a year or more just to
|
|
|
Hope someone can perhaps give me a little info about our options in
this situation:
We purchased a motorcycle from a man (who we will call Jim) who had
recently purchased the bike himself, the week prior, from the original
owner. After having it a f
|
|
|
"William Brenner" <wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote
> The U.S. Postal Service has proposed yet another rate increase,
> this one would raise first class postage to 42 cents in May, 2007.
>
> At the same time they also propose issuing a "forever stam
|
|
|
"Dave Zass" <sendmespam@webquestinc.com> wrote
> I'm self employed and have formed an LLC.
> If I do not have any partners, do I still need to file a 1065?
Single menber LLC's file a Schedule C (same as a self-employed person)
unless you el
|
|
|
"Carlos" <brastras@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:8g9h22ldvmdfoq70n6dgqpehutenh4jstf@4ax.com...
> Apparently, you haven't read my March 18 posting
I not only read it, I had it open in a window as I composed the post you are
responding to. *
|
|
|
I bought my first new car a Scion TC on June the 20th. I told the
salesman from the start that I thought I would need my dad to cosign
for me so I would get a good APR, but he was determined to get it done
in my name. He first comes back saying that h
|
|
|
bluecobra wrote:
> I'm interested in recording a sports rally, such the type as one thrown by
> the team's town after winning a super bowl, stanley cup, etc. This recording
> would then be edited (non professionally) and then have the duplicates sold
|
|
|
JPF wrote:
> If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never showed, can
> they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
Depends on if the dismissal was "without prejudice" (allows a later
suit on the same subject matter) or
|
|
|
JPF wrote:
> If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never showed, can
> they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
>
That wouldn't be fair, would it? The plaintiff wasted the court's time
and subjected the defendan
|
|
|
JPF <f8thnhim@glory.com> wrote:
> If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never showed, can
> they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
Depends. Was it dismissed "with prejudice" (probably was, in this case) or
"withou
|
|
|
> If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never showed,
> can
> they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
>
> JP
Normally such cases are dismissed with prejudice which means that the
matter should not be brou
|
|
|
Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:28:23 -0400 from JPF <f8thnhim@glory.com>:
> If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never showed, can
> they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
Yes, they can try. (Anyone can always try.)
Whet
|
|
|
In article <ub5u72d9hco0k08rfkak8v1gfdm65883c0@4ax.com>,
JPF <f8thnhim@glory.com> wrote:
>If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never showed, can
>they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
Was it dismissed with or wi
|
|
|
"JPF" <f8thnhim@glory.com> writes:
> If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never showed, can
> they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
They can file a request to have it reinstated, if they can convince
a judge tha
|
|
|
JPF wrote:
> If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never showed, can
> they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
Was it dismissed with or without prejudice?
|
|
|
Hi,
I rented an apartment in Irvine, CA and recently moved out. Yesterday,
I called up the apartment office to check the status of my deposit
($300).
In this deposit, $100 is a cleanup fee.
To my surprise and shock, I was informed that I instead owe
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> In most employment matters, we must make the exception "unless you
> have a contract specifying a particular term of employment." However,
> if you truly *cannot* take the job -- that is, if it's not just
> inconvenient but impos
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:rp46r1h12p4sfkfh7v0mgt8upd5ra0jdd4@4ax.com...
> In article <kjf0r19ab7hnq6e6qj8s93fsehe87imbci@4ax.com>,
> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:13:05 -0500 fr
|
|
|
I have been getting threatening letters of an unpaid RR subscription
supposedly going to be a sent to collection agency. I NEVER ordered
anything. But I am worried about their messing up my credit record. So
far I have not responded to their letters. O
|
|
|
First, I'm not sure if this is the correct group, if not I apologize and if
someone can direct me to the correct group I'd appreciate it...
I have a dilemma. Two weekends a month I go with my wife to pick up her two
girls at their fathers house, the
|
|
|
<stan.morey@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:31cqv1tu3vhbrucgd20sg4pvk3nf6co6uu@4ax.com...
> If that is the case, my second question (corollory if you will) is, if
> someone or a group of indivisuals created some company or incorporation
> (say inc
|
|
|
I signed my business up with Access Communications for phone service back
in 2003 in order to save about $5.00 a month off of Bellsouth's rates. It
was a 2 year commitment.
In 2004, Access "forgot" to add my business to the local phonebook so that
|
|
|
katrinapeker@yahoo.com wrote:
> nospam@isp.com kirjoitti:
>
> > On 15 May 2006, "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > * * * I still don't understand where a court held that
> > >they had infringed on your copyright befo
|
|
|
katrinapeker@yahoo.com wrote:
> nospam@isp.com kirjoitti:
>
> > On 15 May 2006, "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > * * * I still don't understand where a court held that
> > >they had infringed on your copyright befo
|
|
|
Rachel <Rachel_8587@removethisyahoo.com> wrote:
> I am sure this man had it all planned out because though they lived in
> Alabama he insisted they be married in Mississippi, where if true,
> I've heard the divorce laws can be backwards or pro-men (no
|
|
|
"Rachel" <Rachel_8587@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ob5u7252ls3uo9ssqft4lgao44f1j1hvcd@4ax.com...
> If someone can point me towards some way to help my sister, I would be
> extremely grateful. In a nutshell, at 18 my sister married an ab
|
|
|
In article <0sor721h7g2iq856j0phucmsl0qkvqjvu1@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>> What's the definition of "do business in Ra
|
|
|
ivanfernandez80@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello
>
> My friend is a Pimp (really he is :-) lol ) and he is thinking of
> making a website advertising some prostitutes that they work for
> him..is it legal??obviously is illegal correct?
> what does he nee
|
|
|
"Alan McKenney" <alan_mckenney1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:j67a42hujbn0tj8vj59uetuiv903aa8rsh@4ax.com...
> 1. The fact that people advertise a rental doesn't mean it's
> legal. They may just assume they won't get caught.
>
|
|
|
does such a book exist?
How does one form a Police Review Board? Commission
--
If you see yourself in others, then whom can you harm?
|
|
|
"Barry Gold" <bgold@nyx.net> wrote in message
news:hpsv12p06s0ks7f6mfugi6df51qo3p72oi@4ax.com...
> AFAIK there is *no* way to obtain good title to chattels that have
> been stolen, except perhaps by estoppel, as I mentioned elsewhere in
> this thre
|
|
|
[OP asked whether an option to buy survives condemnation. Several
posters have indicated that the option would be extinguished and some
have touched on the more complicated issue of fair compensation for the
tenant/optionholder's interest in the conde
|
|
|
"six-pack to be" <persspolice@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:l16c625tpfotartncbo3qk46l0e801h83s@4ax.com...
> Recently I hired a contractor. After he is done, he is demanding $3000
> for a job that took one day. I went over to home depot and it s
|
|
|
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>:
>> If the States weren't parties to it, why were they required to ratify
>> it before it could take effect?
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>*Because* the states weren't parties to it, they *did* *not* rat
|
|
|
"BoyntonStu" <stu@aaronj.com> wrote in message
news:pihe72tg9iugrkom6m7hitfegcjs61i6dh@4ax.com...
> The U.S. Constitution was written as a contract between men living
> hundreds of years ago.
>
> What wording binds the posterity (us) to that docum
|
|
|
"boostm3" <elliott.paule@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ipsts1905vr5qut7kf108c5d0qgej5hqv1@4ax.com...
> "The will should be signed by (me) in the presence of of three
> disinterested
> adult witnesses and a notary public...."
>
> If Im reading
|
|
|
Bernie Cosell <bernie@fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
>
>Held: When public employees make statements pursuant to
>their official duties, they are not speaking as citizens
>for First Amendment purposes, and the Constitution does
>not insulate their communicat
|
|
|
Oleg Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3
> months overdue)
> (in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123 (hope no points, but not sure)
>
> Is it worth fighting in court ? Is it even po
|
|
|
In misc.legal.moderated Oleg Konovalov <okonoval@verizon.net> wrote:
> Hi,
> My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3
> months overdue)
> (in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123 (hope no points, but not sure)
> Is it
|
|
|
"Oleg Konovalov" <okonoval@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:dc5u72tfa3mo62an640s02lcsotmblsi6m@4ax.com...
> Hi,
>
> My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3
> months overdue)
> (in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123
|
|
|
Oleg Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3
> months overdue)
> (in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123 (hope no points, but not sure)
>
> Is it worth fighting in court ? Is it even poss
|
|
|
> My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3
> months overdue)
> (in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123 (hope no points, but not sure)
>
> Is it worth fighting in court ? Is it even possible ?
> I mean, what do you say t
|
|
|
[ridiculous crosspost list removed]
Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:28:15 -0400 from Oleg Konovalov
<okonoval@verizon.net>:
> Hi,
>
> My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3
> months overdue)
> (in Princeton, NJ) with pena
|
|
|
on 6/1/2006 9:28 AM Oleg Konovalov said the following:
> Hi,
>
> My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3
> months overdue)
> (in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123 (hope no points, but not sure)
>
> Is it worth fig
|
|
|
"Oleg Konovalov" <okonoval@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:dc5u72tfa3mo62an640s02lcsotmblsi6m@4ax.com...
> Hi,
>
> My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3
> months overdue)
> (in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123
|
|
|
In article <dc5u72tfa3mo62an640s02lcsotmblsi6m@4ax.com>,
Oleg Konovalov <okonoval@verizon.net> wrote:
>My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker
>was 3 months overdue) (in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123 (hope no
>points,
|
<