|
|
"David Ames" <worldrecord@juno.com> wrote in message
news:da6782t8inpqam0t6k3n948ka13j0bbr26@4ax.com...
> On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
> knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
> kno
|
|
|
In article <da6782t8inpqam0t6k3n948ka13j0bbr26@4ax.com>,
David Ames <worldrecord@juno.com> wrote:
>On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
>knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
>know."
>
>Acc
|
|
|
> On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
> knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
> know."
>
> According to my understanding, in a bench trial, the judge determines
> the facts. How does a jud
|
|
|
David Ames wrote:
> On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
> knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
> know."
>
> According to my understanding, in a bench trial, the judge determines
> the fa
|
|
|
"David Ames" <worldrecord@juno.com> wrote:
>On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
>knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
>know."
>
>According to my understanding, in a bench trial, the judg
|
|
|
Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:43:43 -0400 from David Ames
<worldrecord@juno.com>:
> On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
> knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
> know."
>
> According to my underst
|
|
|
"David Ames" <worldrecord@juno.com> wrote in message
news:da6782t8inpqam0t6k3n948ka13j0bbr26@4ax.com...
> On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
> knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
> know.
|
|
|
David Ames wrote:
> On innumerable occasions, a plaintiff or defendant will testify "He
> knows .." and Judge Judy will assert, on the contrary, "He doesn't
> know."
Keep telling yourself, "it's only a TV show". The ordinary rules of
evidence and
|
|
|
aimee.wiley@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's the deal.. I got into a car accident and the other party was
> liable. The insurance co. deemed my car a total loss and I accepted the
> amount they valued for my car. Now I bought a used car to repl
|
|
|
aimee.wiley@gmail.com wrote:
>The insurance co. deemed my car a total loss and I accepted the
> amount they valued for my car. Now I bought a used car to replace my
> totaled car and am now needing to transfer title and registration and
> pay taxes.
|
|
|
In article <ca67821l6so709ejr5mevmq27skbu5fi7p@4ax.com>,
aimee.wiley@gmail.com wrote:
> Here's the deal.. I got into a car accident and the other party was
> liable. The insurance co. deemed my car a total loss and I accepted the
> amount they valu
|
|
|
Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:43:38 -0400 from <aimee.wiley@gmail.com>:
> Here's the deal.. I got into a car accident and the other party was
> liable. The insurance co. deemed my car a total loss and I accepted the
> amount they valued for my car. Now I bought
|
|
|
aimee.wiley@gmail.com wrote:
> Here's the deal.. I got into a car accident and the other party was
> liable. The insurance co. deemed my car a total loss and I accepted the
> amount they valued for my car. Now I bought a used car to replace my
> tot
|
|
|
In article <9a6782td3tcrhm4j6c5r529si7jf73sngv@4ax.com>,
crispywafers@gmail.com wrote:
> Jim would rather not have to go through the process of titling the bike
> in his name in order to sell it to us for obvious cost/tax reasons.
> However, we are
|
|
|
Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:43:30 -0400 from <crispywafers@gmail.com>:
Jim bought a motorcycle from one owner and wants to turn around and
sell it to our anonymous questioner (Q) without titling it himself. Q
wants to know if that can legally be done.
|
|
|
>I bought my first new car a Scion TC on June the 20th. I told the
> salesman from the start that I thought I would need my dad to cosign
> for me so I would get a good APR, but he was determined to get it done
> in my name. He first comes back saying
|
|
|
ucf.molson@gmail.com wrote:
> I bought my first new car a Scion TC on June the 20th. I told the
> salesman from the start that I thought I would need my dad to cosign
> for me so I would get a good APR, but he was determined to get it done
> in my
|
|
|
<ucf.molson@gmail.com> wrote:
[OP bought a new car, was offered financing at 13%, declined that,
was offered 7%, accepted that. He has an installment contract and
possession of the car. Now dealer is "waiting for the loan to be
approved." OP ca
|
|
|
On Sunday, June 4th, 2006, ucf.molson@gmail.com wrote, in part:
> I bought my first new car a Scion TC on June the 20th.
> [OP took delivery of the vehicle and was later told his financing fell
> through. Financing was to have been arranged through a
|
|
|
ucf.molson@gmail.com wrote:
[bought a car and is concerned that the agreed upon financing will fall
apart]
> Two weeks passed and I hadn't heard anything about going to the
> credit union so I called the dealership, and they told me they were
> st
|
|
|
Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:43:01 -0400 from Paul <paul@push.com>:
> JPF wrote:
> > If a small claims case was dismissed because the plaintiff never
> > showed, can they try to sue the defendant again at a later date?
> >
>
> That wouldn't be fair, would
|
|
|
Taps,
You've recently moved from an apartment. You have been informed that not
only will you not get back your security deposit but that you owe a
significant sum for damages. You have been provided a list of damages and
the reasonable cost of
|
|
|
In article <g96782t7hks9nnrfsf3mbascu86pj5miau@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>Impossibility is very tough to prove. It includes both logical
>impossibility (e.g., delivering a package in the past) and
>impracticability
|
|
|
In article <b96782hfpn0ltedugqign4m2virja87brn@4ax.com>,
ComCast Personal News Groups <ajmnews@com.cast.net> wrote:
>How ever her ex-husband who is now remarried with a new child on the way
>consistently becomes verbally violent (in front of the girl
|
|
|
ComCast Personal News Groups wrote:
>My question is, would I be held chargeable if an altercation
> were to take place? If he swung first at either my wife or I and I defended
> either one of us? Would it matter if we were in the street or on the s
|
|
|
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:42:21 -0400, "Jim" <qwerty@abc.com> wrote:
[Phone provider fails to list business in 2004 book, then asks for
early termination fee when customer fails to give 30 day notice of
termination at end of term.]
Talk to a lawyer w
|
|
|
I have an inquiry concerning a landlord tenant matter in Connecticut. I
recall reading that a landlord has an obligation to prorate the
reasonable replacement cost of a fixture or item by its expected life.
I.e., an eight year old carpet with an expect
|
|
|
Hi!
My friend in MI has to kick her boyfriend out of her apartment. He's
not on the lease, and has not contributed to household managment (not
paid rent or bills). He's been missing for days, not responding to
attemps to be reached. She wants to se
|
|
|
My mother is in Hospice care and not expected to survive more than a week.
I have searched the internet and found some good resources but it seems
there are no good instructions regarding the process.
She has left a simple will naming me as her pe
|
|
|
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:41:57 -0400, Crusader george <georgek@humboldt1.com>
wrote:
>does such a book exist?
>How does one form a Police Review Board? Commission
You might want to start with this web site, a guide to municipal government
in Califo
|
|
|
Each of us signed and notarized a Personal Loan Agreement to that fact.
I lent her the money at one percent per annum.
We agreed to set her payments at $200 per month starting January 2006.
I received the first two, late, and $100 six weeks ago.
|
|
|
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:41:53 -0400, "Scott Hedrick"
<diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Florida has a law that more or less says that if a bad title to real
>property has been undisputed for at least 30 years, then the title can be
>considered
|
|
|
Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:41:43 -0400 from Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>:
> Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>:
> >> If the States weren't parties to it, why were they required to ratify
> >> it before it could take effect?
>
> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.f
|
|
|
Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:41:40 -0400 from Scott Hedrick <diespammers-
dinehnm@yahoo.com>:
> At a minimum, the people who are in a position to act on a Federal level
> take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
.... to act on a Federal _or_State_ level ...
|
|
|
In article <h867821spdbrj0ei56a8pq3e3nfbecl9ca@4ax.com>,
Scott Hedrick <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Depends on both state law and the form. I've prepared a deed for my parents,
>where both were owners, with separate notary statements for
|
|
|
If they pass a flag-burning constitutional amendment and criminal law
and I burn a Liberian flag
http://worldatlas.com/webimage/flags/countrys/africa/liberia.htm
will that support a prosecution?
What if the audience thinks it was an American flag be
|
|
|
I for example have come to be known as "Gunwitch", in the "seduction
community" and in some offline magazines and books, as a writer of
several free texts called "the gunwitch method" etc, a name I took long
ago as a screen name for reasons unrelate
|
|
|
In article <t76782prmelog43k8rgd0re5tej68kqosg@4ax.com>,
Jim <qwerty@abc.com> wrote:
>"Dr. Yattz" <winwinsit@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>I gave him 30 days
>> notice to terminate the lease (which is due to end in November),
>> pointing out that no
|
|
|
Stan wrote:
> How does a creditor collect under the following situation?
>
> 1. A widow(er) has titled all her bank accounts as she ITF her
> children.
> 2. She has named her children equal beneficiaries of her IRA.
> 3. She owns no real estate
|
|
|
his is an update to a message I posted earlier in the year (on Feb.
9). I've copied and pasted the original posting below, for anyone
interested or able to offer some help or direction.
My 15 year old daughter, who is no longer in my custody, and in
|
|
|
pennsylady2002@yahoo.com wrote:
> I don't know which newsgroup would be the most appropriate to post this
> question to; and two days' worth of web searching has turned up
> nothing.
>
> A disabled relative recently was given a Section 8 housing as
|
|
|
pennsylady2002@yahoo.com wrote:
> I don't know which newsgroup would be the most appropriate to post this
> question to; and two days' worth of web searching has turned up
> nothing.
>
> A disabled relative recently was given a Section 8 housing as
|
|
|
Paul <paul@justice.com> wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>>
>> California Rule of Court Rule 201 has the applicable rules
>> http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/rules/titletwo/title2-1-10.htm#TopOfPage
>
> Thanks for the reference.
> Glad my state has
|
|
|
In article <j76782plf6mho6gvo3ldj85rk8ku6t27l3@4ax.com>,
Paul <paul@justice.com> wrote:
>I can only imagine how tedious compliance must have been before the
>development of word processing programs!
They sold paper pre-numbered and lined.
Set
|
|
|
In article <j76782plf6mho6gvo3ldj85rk8ku6t27l3@4ax.com>,
Paul <paul@justice.com> wrote:
>Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>
>
>>
>> California Rule of Court Rule 201 has the applicable rules
>> http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/rules/titletwo/title2-1-10.htm
|
|
|
Paul wrote:
> Glad my state has no such rule.
MD doesn't either
> I can only imagine how tedious compliance must have been before the
> development of word processing programs!
Sheesh, it wasn't that hard. The stationery shops had preprinte
|
|
|
In article <e76782d6t3ohuj7ea5410qbhcpep24gfit@4ax.com>,
Scott Hedrick <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>He *did* say that we (citizens of the US) are not the only ones who can call
>ourselves Americans. What with free speech and all, he's cor
|
|