|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following two decisions have just a
|
|
|
In article <mfpd82p3vgrar7l1jnn7vhrpn3oe7uueeq@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>If I were the judge I wouldn't let you testify to another person's
>presumed knowledge either. All you can testify to is what YOU know.
> You know
|
|
|
"Tony" <tony23@dslextreme.WHATISTHIS.com> wrote in message
news:tfpd82h331vcksb2juenrvet3o2hbrvsvd@4ax.com...
>
> It seems to me that it is a grave mistake to view Judge Judy as a good
> example of a properly run courtroom.
>
> Why? Because the sho
|
|
|
Mark A wrote:
> >
>
> Judge Judy is a terrible jurist.
Agreed. In one case, a defendant presented court documents excusing
his further financial responsibility in a matter. Judge Judy crumpled
up his documents and threw them on the floor.
I
|
|
|
In article <2a6782p9fb9krca76a24etobqds0km04kb@4ax.com>,
<ucf.molson@gmail.com> wrote:
.. . .
> He's comes back and
>says he has good news, he was able to get one of the local credit union
>to agree to the terms and all I had to do was go down to t
|
|
|
> The short answer is yes they can recover all damages. By your own
> admission you left the apartment dirty (stained tile and carpet) and
> damaged
> (broken door and tub). You agree that the list was long. It sounds like
> you
> trashed the pla
|
|
|
on 6/7/2006 8:18 AM David Martel said the following:
> Taps,
>
> You've recently moved from an apartment. You have been informed that not
> only will you not get back your security deposit but that you owe a
> significant sum for damages. You h
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <b96782hfpn0ltedugqign4m2virja87brn@4ax.com>,
>ComCast Personal News Groups <ajmnews@com.cast.net> wrote:
>
>>How ever her ex-husband who is now remarried with a new child on the way
>>consistentl
|
|
|
CindyB wrote:
> Hi!
> My friend in MI has to kick her boyfriend out of her apartment. He's
> not on the lease, and has not contributed to household managment (not
> paid rent or bills). He's been missing for days, not responding to
> attemps to b
|
|
|
I've been roped into helping my father-in-law with his estate planning
(which, suddenly, has become very important to him). Unfortunately he
doesn't want to get lawyers involved and I'm not one either so I'm
doing the best I can.
He has a living tru
|
|
|
CindyB wrote:
> Hi!
> My friend in MI has to kick her boyfriend out of her apartment. He's
> not on the lease, and has not contributed to household managment (not
> paid rent or bills). He's been missing for days, not responding to
> attemps to b
|
|
|
DonC wrote:
[OP's mother will die soon and he is nominated as PR of her estate in
her will. Her assets are a $140,000 home, personal property of
$40,000, and bank accounts of $80,000. He is a "joint owner" of the
bank accounts. He has been told t
|
|
|
In the contract that I'm reading I see a supposedly gibberish phrase:
"This contract shall be governed by the laws of Sweden (to the
exclusion of any conflicting usage of the trade)".
Is it at least a correctly drawn English sentence? What does t
|
|
|
Work on the shower was being performed as part of the termite expense,
to be paid
by the sellers of the house. Near completion, the contractor for the
inspection company hired to do the work asked if a shower door was
wanted. The buyer said yes, and s
|
|
|
Can a government agency be charged with a crime, or sued civilly for
conspiracy, or whatever, for not enforcing the law? Just curious after
Bush said "Catch and release has ended", yet ICE was apparently recorded
telling a caller they wern't intere
|
|
|
Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:18:30 -0400 from Hooliganz <brettharlow123
@gmail.com>:
You lent money to your ex wife at 1%, and you have a written loan
agreement. She made the first two payments late, made a partial third
payment, and that's it. She's now t
|
|
|
Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:18:18 -0400 from Seth Breidbart
<sethb@panix.com>:
> In article <h867821spdbrj0ei56a8pq3e3nfbecl9ca@4ax.com>,
> Scott Hedrick <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
[not allowed to notarize documents for close relatives]
>
> Th
|
|
|
on 6/7/2006 8:18 AM Seth Breidbart said the following:
> In article <h867821spdbrj0ei56a8pq3e3nfbecl9ca@4ax.com>,
> Scott Hedrick <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Depends on both state law and the form. I've prepared a deed for my parents,
|
|
|
I was surprised to find out that in the federal courts, a determination
of foreign law is considered to be a question of law.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule44_1.htm
I thought that most common law systems consider determination of
foreign
|
|
|
In article <8epd82hc92uu6sanfpl5tghoia2ogm44uj@4ax.com>,
<pfeiffersoro@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>If they pass a flag-burning constitutional amendment and criminal law
>and I burn a Liberian flag
>http://worldatlas.com/webimage/flags/countrys/africa/liberia.h
|
|
|
[pfeiffersoro@yahoo.fr wonders if he could be prosecuted
for burning a Liberian flag, given the relevant constitutional
amendment and associated statutory enactments under
consideration.]
The US House has passed a proposed amendment containing the f
|
|
|
In article <8epd82hc92uu6sanfpl5tghoia2ogm44uj@4ax.com>,
<pfeiffersoro@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>If they pass a flag-burning constitutional amendment and criminal law
>and I burn a Liberian flag
>http://worldatlas.com/webimage/flags/countrys/africa/liberia.h
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:18:12 -0400, "Gunwitch" <Gunwitch7@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> I for example have come to be known as "Gunwitch", in the "seduction
>community" and in some offline magazines and books...
> The texts I write are... not works of
>f
|
|
|
"Gunwitch" <Gunwitch7@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I for example have come to be known as "Gunwitch", in the
> "seduction community" and in some offline magazines and books, as a
> writer of several free texts called "the gunwitch method" etc, a
> na
|
|
|
I have just filed case in California court for wrongful termination
(age discrimination) case.
I have just come to know that the company has filed a petition 2 months
ago in bankruptcy court for Chapter 11 protection.
How does this affect my clai
|
|
|
Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:18:10 -0400 from Seth Breidbart
<sethb@panix.com>:
> In article <t76782prmelog43k8rgd0re5tej68kqosg@4ax.com>,
> Jim <qwerty@abc.com> wrote:
> >If you can "break a lease at any time" then that isn't a lease, is it?
>
> Why not?
|
|
|
on 6/7/2006 8:18 AM Timothy said the following:
> Stan wrote:
>> How does a creditor collect under the following situation?
>>
>> 1. A widow(er) has titled all her bank accounts as she ITF her
>> children.
>> 2. She has named her children equal be
|
|
|
(And i'm not talking about the IRS...i *will* be reporting the winnings on
my tax returns). I am preparing to receive a large payout ($35k) from some
different offshore bookmakers where I won $$$ from 2004 through now.
Estimated
taxes were paid on the
|
|
|
on 6/4/2006 7:40 PM Stan said the following:
> How does a creditor collect under the following situation?
>
> 1. A widow(er) has titled all her bank accounts as she ITF her
> children.
> 2. She has named her children equal beneficiaries of her IRA
|
|
|
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> Stan wrote:
>> How does a creditor collect under the following situation?
>>
>> 1. A widow(er) has titled all her bank accounts as she ITF her
>> children.
>> 2. She has named her children equ
|
|
|
on 6/7/2006 8:18 AM update to 3rd party non-custodial abduction said the
following:
>
> After learning about this abusive "guardianship" -- before I could
> mention anything at all; to the guardian, I was told that the "CPS"
> case worker in Place
|
|
|
sjk,
Let me begin by saying that while I will summarize the complaint
contained in your post I did not read your long post entirely or look for
your previous posts. You recently met with your 15 yr old child for a visit.
You are not the child'
|
|
|
In article <0epd82599tq3f7rf3nmbijbb18fqnsg1dj@4ax.com>,
Pat <groups@artisticphotography.us> wrote:
>Go talk to the building inspector. Interpretations vary. There may
>not be a ban on a single-family home with two kitchens, two baths, etc.
Ther
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
: *NOT* tedious at all. You simply use paper with the required markings
: _pre-printed_ on it. No different than a book of sales receipt forms.
MSWord has a "pleadings wizard" that does all o
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following two decisions have just
|
|
