|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <3c5u72h6c36aforjec0g3ib04f69dp9t67@4ax.com>,
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>If the email was sent via gmail's servers then they could show that it was
>>sent. That wouldn't prove it was r
|
|
|
Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:35:28 -0400 from David Ames
<worldrecord@juno.com>:
> I mentioned this to a prosecutor, who wondered what was Judge Judy's
> record on appeal. I had to tell her that there is no appeal. Judge
> Judy's court is not a court of law
|
|
|
"David Ames" <worldrecord@juno.com> wrote:
> I mentioned this to a prosecutor, who wondered what was Judge
> Judy's record on appeal. I had to tell her that there is no
> appeal. Judge Judy's court is not a court of law with privileges
> and safeg
|
|
|
Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
benefits -- how does it hurt them? As I understand it, they will do
almost anything to try to block an unemployment c
|
|
|
In article <m7ui82pjv8r9j7groqrm49rn79ovod4su7@4ax.com>,
Dave Zass <sendmespam@volleyball.net> wrote:
>Possession is 99% of the law. They have your money. The landlord has put
>the burden on you to prove that you haven't damaged his apartment. Wi
|
|
|
Dave,
I hope that this reply will answer both you and Mr. Hyde.
>> The short answer is yes they can recover all damages. By your own
>> admission you left the apartment dirty (stained tile and carpet) and
>> damaged
>> (broken door and tub).
|
|
|
Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:35:24 -0400 from <obfusciatrist@gmail.com>:
> I've been roped into helping my father-in-law with his estate planning
> (which, suddenly, has become very important to him). Unfortunately he
> doesn't want to get lawyers involved and
|
|
|
obfusciatrist@gmail.com wrote:
> I've been roped into helping my father-in-law with his estate
> planning (which, suddenly, has become very important to him).
> Unfortunately he doesn't want to get lawyers involved and I'm not
> one either so I'm do
|
|
|
In article <h7ui82dvrk51j5h03pfn80dg4t75t9b1a1@4ax.com> obfusciatrist@gmail.com
writes:
>I've been roped into helping my father-in-law with his estate planning
>(which, suddenly, has become very important to him). Unfortunately he
>doesn't want to get
|
|
|
Foolishly, tonight (June 9) I tried to do the right thing and give my
landlady extra notice that I'm planning to move out at the start of
August. In my naivete, I thought she might be grateful for having
more than the bare 30 days to find a new tena
|
|
|
"A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> The bank accounts probably will not be estate property, but it
> depends on the exact nature of the joint ownership. Most are
> joint tenants with rights of survivorship (JTWROS), in which case
|
|
|
Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:35:21 -0400 from <rentgenas11@yahoo.com>:
> In the contract that I'm reading I see a supposedly gibberish phrase:
>
> "This contract shall be governed by the laws of Sweden (to the
> exclusion of any conflicting usage of the trad
|
|
|
rentgenas11@yahoo.com wrote:
> In the contract that I'm reading I see a supposedly gibberish phrase:
>
> "This contract shall be governed by the laws of Sweden (to the
> exclusion of any conflicting usage of the trade)".
>
> Is it at least a correct
|
|
|
In article <a7ui82po56jq5400tn49v6udrj9g0gsf4e@4ax.com>,
<rentgenas11@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In the contract that I'm reading I see a supposedly gibberish phrase:
>
>"This contract shall be governed by the laws of Sweden (to the
>exclusion of any confli
|
|
|
rentgenas11@yahoo.com wrote:
> "This contract shall be governed by the laws of Sweden (to the
> exclusion of any conflicting usage of the trade)".
>
> Is it at least a correctly drawn English sentence? What does the
> preposition "to" mean here?
|
|
|
In article <a7ui82po56jq5400tn49v6udrj9g0gsf4e@4ax.com>,
<rentgenas11@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In the contract that I'm reading I see a supposedly gibberish phrase:
>
>"This contract shall be governed by the laws of Sweden (to the
>exclusion of any confli
|
|
|
I was divorced in 1982 and received the home we shared in the divving
up of the assets [no children involved.
I am now selling the property have a problem with the Title,,, The
title company found a piece of the home property [which we purchase
aft
|
|
|
Hello gang,
This non-lawyer has not posted here for a long time. Meanwhile, I've
been busy finishing my book about a cesspool of corruption in Florida's
judiciary. I appreciate, in fact solicit your comments, because if the
predicate or any of the
|
|
|
My son, who is in his 20's recently applied for a job at one of the
fast food restaurants. The job was NOT working with food. In fact he
would not work inside the restaurant at all. He applied for the
position of "groundskeeper", which meant he woul
|
|
|
hlngus@hotmail.com wrote:
> Work on the shower was being performed as part of the termite
> expense, to be paid by the sellers of the house. Near completion,
> the contractor for the inspection company hired to do the work
> asked if a shower door
|
|
|
Network Admin wrote:
> Can a government agency be charged with a crime, or sued civilly for
> conspiracy, or whatever, for not enforcing the law? Just curious after
> Bush said "Catch and release has ended", yet ICE was apparently recorded
> tellin
|
|
|
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Can a government agency be charged with a crime, or sued civilly for
>conspiracy, or whatever, for not enforcing the law? Just curious after
>Bush said "Catch and release has ended", yet ICE was apparently r
|
|
|
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Can a government agency be charged with a crime, or sued civilly
> for conspiracy, or whatever, for not enforcing the law? Just
> curious after Bush said "Catch and release has ended", yet ICE was
> apparen
|
|
|
"Manoj" wrote:
> I was surprised to find out that in the federal courts,
> a determination of foreign law is considered to be a
> question of law. . . . I thought that most common law
> systems consider determination of foreign law
|
|
|
Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com wrote:
> [pfeiffersoro@yahoo.fr wonders if he could be prosecuted
> for burning a Liberian flag, given the relevant constitutional
> amendment and associated statutory enactments under
> consideration.]
> The US House has pass
|
|
|
<mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I have just filed case in California court for wrongful termination
>(age discrimination) case.
>
>I have just come to know that the company has filed a petition 2 months
>ago in bankruptcy court for Chapter 11 prot
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com>:
>> Jim <qwerty@abc.com> wrote:
>> >If you can "break a lease at any time" then that isn't a lease,
>> >is it?
>>
>> Why not? A lease can certainly say it's cance
|
|
|
What is the copyright law in America pertaining to the taking of
pictures for use in a commerical product of items in public libraries
such as the Los Angeles Natural History Museum (artifacts only, not
books or printed works). The photos would most li
|
|
|
David Martel wrote:
> sjk,
>
> Let me begin by saying that while I will summarize the complaint
> contained in your post I did not read your long post entirely or look for
> your previous posts. You recently met with your 15 yr old child for a
|
|
|
The service manual from the auto mfr recommends service at 100,000
miles for a timing belt. If the belt fails at an earlier odometer
reading and the engine is damaged as a consequence of the failure, is
this a latent defect that the mfr is liable for,
|
|
|
Hi, my daughter was involved in an accident in a private property
parking lot. There were no stop signs. There was markings on the ground
but they were half covered in new pavement. The other guy also had no
stop sign. What happened is she was driving
|
|
|
During a visit by a contractor to our home, to discuss the new basement
"finishing systems," the contractor's assistant inspected a vertical
crack in our poured concrete foundation. He reassured me about it and
added that "the more vertical, the less
|
|