|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <mfpd82p3vgrar7l1jnn7vhrpn3oe7uueeq@4ax.com>,
> Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >If I were the judge I wouldn't let you testify to another person's
> >presumed knowledge either. All you can testify t
|
|
|
In article <e7ro82506l290ka2helmmdpujch1oj8e7q@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:35:28 -0400 from David Ames
><worldrecord@juno.com>:
>> I mentioned this to a prosecutor, who wondered what was Judge Judy's
|
|
|
apirion@gmail.com writes:
> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
> would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
> benefits -- how does it hurt them?
It increases what they have to pay into the s
|
|
|
In article <a7ro82hhcaolfdidp3iqrjgem622mqsakv@4ax.com>, apirion@gmail.com
wrote:
> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
> would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
> benefits -- how does it h
|
|
|
apirion@gmail.com wrote:
> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
> would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
> benefits -- how does it hurt them? As I understand it, they will do
> almost anything
|
|
|
In article <a7ro82hhcaolfdidp3iqrjgem622mqsakv@4ax.com>,
<apirion@gmail.com> wrote:
>Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
>would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
>benefits -- how does it hurt
|
|
|
apirion@gmail.com wrote:
> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
> would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
> benefits -- how does it hurt them? As I understand it, they will do
> almost anything
|
|
|
In article <a7ro82hhcaolfdidp3iqrjgem622mqsakv@4ax.com>,
<apirion@gmail.com> wrote:
>Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
>would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
>benefits -- how does it hurt
|
|
|
In article <a7ro82hhcaolfdidp3iqrjgem622mqsakv@4ax.com>,
apirion@gmail.com wrote:
> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
> would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
> benefits -- how does it h
|
|
|
apirion@gmail.com wrote:
> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
> would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
> benefits -- how does it hurt them? As I understand it, they will do
> almost anything
|
|
|
>Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
>would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
>benefits -- how does it hurt them? As I understand it, they will do
>almost anything to try to block an unemployme
|
|
|
I've been pondering the 'signing statements' that Pres Bush has been
affixing to surprisingly many bills he has signed into law. Ignoring the
political questions, I'm wondering how the Executive branch gets the
discretion, in the first place, to make
|
|
|
David Martel wrote:
> Reasonable wear and tear is permitted, causing the damage or
>> negligence it is not. How does that constitute "trashing the place"?
>
> See the above. He's not being billed for reaonable wear and tear, He left
> stained
|
|
|
In article <07ro821t7up2s0gjamck662p3h81knu8di@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Foolishly, tonight (June 9) I tried to do the right thing and give my
>landlady extra notice that I'm planning to move out at the start of
>Aug
|
|
|
In article <c7ui82thonqvsp2i1u3ual25e4s425dqsq@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>DonC wrote:
>
>[OP's mother will die soon and he is nominated as PR of her estate in
>her will. Her assets are a $140,000 home, personal prop
|
|
|
thomasjules1@h-tmail.com wrote:
> My son, who is in his 20's recently applied for a job at one of the
> fast food restaurants.
....
> they told him that no employee is allowed to have any facial hair, and
> no male employee can have hair below the co
|
|
|
thomasjules1@h-tmail.com wrote:
[son told to cut hair and shave for job]
>
> I am rather angry about this. He has always been well groomed, clean
> and neat. He just likes having longer hair, and having a mustache.
> That has always been fine
|
|
|
Tom,
Your twentysomething son applied for a job and was told he would have
to shave off his mustache and cut his hair. You question the legality
of this requirement.
In the US, employers are legally free to be as arbitrary as they
like, except
|
|
|
bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
> <mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>I have just filed case in California court for wrongful
>>termination (age discrimination) case.
>>
>>I have just come to know that the company has filed a petition 2
>>month
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
> In a case where a contract provides that a party can cancel at any time
> without consequence, it may be considered an illusory contract. If it
> is not enforceable against one party, courts will say that there is no
>
|
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:20:44 -0400, tjframe@gmail.com wrote:
>What is the copyright law in America pertaining to the taking of
>pictures for use in a commerical product of items in public libraries...
>For example, if I take a photograph of a dinosa
|
|
|
rick wintomac wrote:
> The service manual from the auto mfr recommends service at 100,000
> miles for a timing belt. If the belt fails at an earlier odometer
> reading and the engine is damaged as a consequence of the failure, is
> this a latent defe
|
|
|
In article <06ro82t8ud1i3i2fqv0ucdlpvqbprgv5qi@4ax.com>,
"rick wintomac" <c308682@gmail.com> wrote:
> The service manual from the auto mfr recommends service at 100,000
> miles for a timing belt. If the belt fails at an earlier odometer
> reading
|
|
|
pennsylady2002@yahoo.com writes:
> week. My ears therefore tingled when the visiting contractor's
> assistant said that horizontal cracks in foundations make a home
> unsellable in Pennsylvania.
What was meant by "unsellable"? Did he mean that t
|
|
|
pennsylady2002@yahoo.com wrote:
> the visiting contractor's
> assistant said that horizontal cracks in foundations make a home
> unsellable in Pennsylvania.
Unsellable how? Legally, or practically? He's probably right that
it would knock the
|
|
