|
|
>on 6/16/2006 9:09 AM prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com said the following:
>> "Signing statements" are NOT binding law. They are nothing more than him
>> saying "here's what I think this law means" or "here's how I'll follow this
>> law", etc. but have no auth
|
|
|
Hello,
it's not the first time when I purchase some appliance, and it does not have
any trace of the maker's name or contact information. Obviously, it's made
by Chinese company without any representation in the U.S.
Wondering, is it OK? I'd thi
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
A friend of mine is moving out of a house they have rented from a
managment company for 6 years. They gave him a list of items that need
to be done before he can get his deposit back. They want the walls
painted and carpets professionally cleaned. I th
|
|
|
krakpot75@yahoo.com wrote:
>I have an appeal filed,Motion to Suppress,based on illegal stop.
>Officer testified at trial.
>She said she observed me going a high rate of speed 40 to 50 mph.(speed
>limit was 45)
>She said she was unable to verify my
|
|
|
k> Do you think i will win?Any questions?Thnx.
What were you charged with, eventually? overspeeding 5mph?
|
|
|
In article <c3gd92d1016s16fi2g5nae989mhj8guu4v@4ax.com>,
krakpot75@yahoo.com wrote:
> I have an appeal filed,Motion to Suppress,based on illegal stop.
> Do you think i will win?Any questions?Thnx.
Why do you think that the traffic stop was illega
|
|
|
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:19:10 -0400 from <krakpot75@yahoo.com>:
> My attorney asked her "so you were basicly working on a hunch he might
> be dui right?"
> She replied"22 years worth of a hunch yes"
>
> Do you think i will win?Any questions?Thnx.
Wh
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
In article <b3gd92lnman6tl9sh3hqcvuoe15fjjg50i@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>[summary: Month-to-month tenancy, 15th not 1st of the month. New York
>law says any notice given by either party after the 15th is not
>effec
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> One question came up in the responses, and I'd appreciate an
> answer. Was my "first part of August, specific date TBD"
> legitimate notice, assuming the exact date is known within the
> next week or
|
|
|
on 6/14/2006 9:22 AM DonC said the following:
> "Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:ffoq82ptgmvhqvvub9vcgfjaq230q305oj@4ax.com...
>> In article <c7ui82thonqvsp2i1u3ual25e4s425dqsq@4ax.com>,
>> A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gm
|
|
|
on 6/14/2006 9:22 AM Stuart A. Bronstein said the following:
> sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>> A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [OP has deceased mothers accounts asks about distributing to his
>> siblings]
> [Stu
|
|
|
In article <73gd92loqbkt3fl06opjvarde192hi1vgo@4ax.com>,
DonC <coondwc@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
>news:t1k5925j12v2lqkj3h6vmimrf8n6fka8jl@4ax.com...
>> Why 12 siblings? There's $80,000 in the a
|
|
|
"DonC" <coondwc@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> I wonder if the issue requiring a "qualified disclaimer" is that
> since the full $80,000 passed to me upon her death, I may be
> considered the recipient of the full $80,000 as a gift and must
> formall
|
|
|
> If she is smart, she'll apologize profusely and refund your money. It
> really isn't worth it for her to battle with you for $500.
>
> JH
Well, at least she smart about this. I took your advice and she is
sending my retainer back. No excuses,
|
|
|
"Mike" <mas_it_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13gd92doi2j680qq7fcrt4sstlhjjnhn05@4ax.com...
>
> Here I got angry at XYZ and blamed them for this. I destroyed my XYZ
> Visa card, and did swear that I will never ever use a credit card from
> an
|
|
|
> Held: The judgment is affirmed.
>
> Affirmed.
Start of reverse gear on the exclusionary rule?
I can't see anybody getting any civil damages out of violations,
despite Scalia's talk about the deterrent effect of civil remedies.
After all, wha
|
|
|
r_ravi_patil@yahoo.com wrote:
> Mike Jacobs wrote:
> > mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > With regard to back wages, I am not owed back wages -- wages not paid
> > > for work already completed -- the company paid for all work completed.
> >
> > I'
|
|
|
mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>> mr_ravi_patil@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> > My claim is for punitive damages for wrongful termination based
>> > on age discrimination.
>> >
>> > After I received the authorization, I filed
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>
>>>What about a dinosaur skeleton? Is the decision about the
>>>posture in which to pose it sufficiently creati
|
|
|
In article <a2gd92t2de1hlitelal6pav541ecc5qivf@4ax.com>,
JMW <jmw@event.horizon> wrote:
> A warrantless blood draw will almost certainly require substantial
> exigent circumstances. Without knowing more than what you have
> mentioned, such circumsta
|
|
|
<JPSHayes@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yesterday, a sample of my blood was taken from me by two Santa Cruz
> county sheriffs deputies and an E.R. Doctor against my will. I was at a
> friends house in his garage just shooting the breeze. Two police men
> came w
|
|
|
Sav,
You signed a lease renewal Aug 1, 2006, through Jul 31, 2007, that
your landlord presented.
Now your landlord tells you that the apartment building will be sold
and you'll then have two months to vacate. You quoted the lease
provisions co
|
|
|
In article <82gd92lpef69j8kelquko032cek68bkev2@4ax.com>,
sav <svv001@gmail.com> wrote:
>A couple of days back I got the notice from the owner that the apt has
>been put on sale and I would be required to show the apt to the
>potential buyers.
Tha
|
|
|
[OP signed a one-year lease on an apartment in Pittsburgh, PA.
Agreed to a one-year extension. Now is notified by the owner that
they plan to sell the apartment (building?) and intend to give him
notice to vacate.]
[language from lease
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> steveo <gnsemail@cox.net> wrote:
> <OP says he hit a stopped car that was in the middle of the interstate. He
> was doing 60mph at the time and had gone "over a rise" and saw the car maybe
> 50 yards ahead with othe
|
|
|
In article <32gd92tfvco6b3hljgjicjn0v3ucn9qr0r@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:08:54 -0400 from steveo <gnsemail@cox.net>:
>> Hello--I hope you can help me understand what the liability might be
>> for th
|
|
|
Ruth <ruburn@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>"steveo" <gnsemail@cox.net> wrote in message:
><Thoughts? Should we get a lawyer? We are pretty angry right now, and I
>plan on calling the adjuster's supervisor tomorrow to try and set things
>right--but are
|
|
|
"Ruth" <ruburn@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> I don't know about California law, but common law generally
> applies acorss the board. It is extremely hard to disprove
> negligence when you hit a stopped car from behind.
California has a rebuttable pr
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> steveo <gnsemail@cox.net>:
>
> summary: You were doing 60 mph, topped a rise, saw a stopped car
> in the road, but could not stop in time and smashed into it. Your
> car was totaled.
>
>> The other
|
|
|
John Hyde wrote:
> on 6/16/2006 9:08 AM Tony said the following:
>
>>I have a few questions in regard to this matter that I will ask at the end:
>>
>>On May 9th, I purchased a used bookstore for $10,000. The previous owner
>>had wanted to just hav
|
|
|
"Clare" <clare1502@aol.com> wrote:
>I filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in late 2004 and received a final notice
>in early 2005.
final notice of what? acknowledging that you had filed a Ch. 7
petition in 2004? that your had been dismissed? that you w
|
|
|
In article <u1gd92t1c37rdo62cc0mirencojsapoibk@4ax.com>,
"Clare" <clare1502@aol.com> wrote:
> I filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in late 2004 and received a final notice
> in early 2005.
> Yesterday I received a "Waiver of Notice of Transfer of Claim".
|
|
|
In article <r1gd925mpqn6v9sfpp5a0gujmp4f7j0d7q@4ax.com>,
T. Blando <netman@verizon.net> wrote:
>I have a question regarding universities. It seems, to me, if a university
>sees and hears of a student's emotional and/or psychological distress it is
>
|
|
