|
|
Barry Gold wrote:
> And, in general, there is no way to force the executive to enforce the
> law. If the AG decides not to prosecute, nobody else can force him to
> do so. If the FCC (for example) decides not to issue licenses that
> the new law g
|
|
|
In Pakistan we follow the Transfer of Property Act 1882. Does Azad
Kashmir use this same act or does it have an equivalent.i will
appreciate an early response. Thank You
|
|
|
the expired CA driver's license.
I went to court and the Judge declared it "correctable".
Now, if only the cops spent more time on "real" crimes.
Maybe this bogus stuff helps them justify a bigger budget. The lousy $10
they got from me sure didn't co
|
|
|
bat wrote:
> I purchase some appliance, and it does not have
> any trace of the maker's name or contact information. Obviously, it's made
> by Chinese company without any representation in the U.S.
I'm assuming it does have a label saying "Made in
|
|
|
Luv,
>A friend of mine is moving out of a house they have rented from a
> managment company for 6 years. They gave him a list of items that need
> to be done before he can get his deposit back. They want the walls
> painted and carpets professionall
|
|
|
bat wrote:
>I'd think every item sold in the U.S. must have some
> sort of contact information on it; does anybody now if such regulation
> exist?
>
I'm unaware of such a regulation and looking around me see several
objects w/o such a label. N
|
|
|
<ephedralover@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fh2g92l3rrcan74l40k8bbsmlfh2pb7g8o@4ax.com...
>A friend of mine is moving out of a house they have rented from a
> managment company for 6 years. They gave him a list of items that need
> to be done be
|
|
|
on 6/20/2006 7:49 AM ephedralover@hotmail.com said the following:
> [tenant rents for 6 years, moves out and landlord wants tenant to clean carpet and paint
>
In every state that I know anything about, a tenant is not responsible
for "ordinary w
|
|
|
In article <fh2g92l3rrcan74l40k8bbsmlfh2pb7g8o@4ax.com>,
<ephedralover@hotmail.com> wrote:
>A friend of mine is moving out of a house they have rented from a
>managment company for 6 years. They gave him a list of items that need
>to be done before h
|
|
|
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:49:40 -0400 from <ephedralover@hotmail.com>:
> A friend of mine is moving out of a house they have rented from a
> managment company for 6 years. They gave him a list of items that need
> to be done before he can get his deposit ba
|
|
|
ephedralover@hotmail.com wrote:
> A friend of mine is moving out of a house they have rented from a
> managment company for 6 years. They gave him a list of items that need
> to be done before he can get his deposit back. They want the walls
> painted
|
|
|
John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
> The problem is in the effect of a disclaimer. The disclaimed
> shares are treated as though OP pre-deceased his mother. Unless
> I'm sorely mistaken, that would mean that he is not the owner of
> the disclaime
|
|
|
> Thus, the cases should be remanded
> for further proceedings. Pp. 1-30.
> Scalia, J., announced the judgment of the Court, and delivered
> an opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas and Alito,
> JJ., joined. Roberts, C. J., filed a concurring o
|
|
|
John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
>> The OP (AKA me) fully intends to distribute the bank accounts
>> equally. A lifetime of good family relationships is worth far
>> more than a mere $80,000. I feel sorry for anyone who doesn't
>> fell the same
|
|
|
DonC <coondwc@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>I wonder if the issue requiring a "qualified disclaimer" is that since the
>full $80,000 passed to me upon her death, I may be considered the recipient
>of the full $80,000 as a gift and must formally declin
|
|
|
In article <13gd92doi2j680qq7fcrt4sstlhjjnhn05@4ax.com>,
Mike <mas_it_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
>A legal expert reply to this story would be greatly appreciated:
I'm not one, but I get to reply anyway.
>As a former XYZ Visa card holder,
You hate
|
|
|
Mike wrote:
> In mid of 2002, I became unemployed again, and of course, I called XYZ
> Visa to activate the insurance. Few months later, I noticed that my XYZ
> Visa card balance hasn't changed! When I called XYZ Visa to find out,
> I was told that
|
|
|
Manoj wrote:
> > Held: The judgment is affirmed.
> >
> > Affirmed.
>
> Start of reverse gear on the exclusionary rule?
>
> I can't see anybody getting any civil damages out of violations,
> despite Scalia's talk about the deterrent effect of civil
|
|
|
In article <ng2g92th6poaalii23ospb8b4von8lnho3@4ax.com>,
Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote:
>I can't see anybody getting any civil damages out of violations,
>despite Scalia's talk about the deterrent effect of civil remedies.
>After all, what is the
|
|
|
In article <ng2g92th6poaalii23ospb8b4von8lnho3@4ax.com>,
Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote:
>Start of reverse gear on the exclusionary rule?
>
>I can't see anybody getting any civil damages out of violations,
>despite Scalia's talk about the deterr
|
|
|
> Roberts,
> C. J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part
> and dissenting in part, in which Scalia and Thomas, JJ.,
> joined.
I wonder what more the disenters would need before they grant a new
trial. If the standard is what they
|
|
|
I have some hypothetical questions regarding electronic privacy:
1) My girlfriend's harddrive failed. She took it out of her computer
and gave it to me and asked me to recover any data on it. I recovered
the data and looked through the contents and
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>In article <41k592h64mu0k7lsqk3ld6dk8p8qjmtmci@4ax.com>,
>Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>>In article <gqd092l0a9j76mrig1lum61gocbqv9ojmf@4ax.com>,
>>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
|
|
|
Stuart Bronstein wrote:
> While a bone reconstruction expert might be called an artist for
> being able to put a skeleton together properly, the finished work is
> not likely a creative expression but a structure created to simulate
> reality. If i
|
|
|
In article <eg2g92djqrrpmcklf2nv2opsde5mhngkrm@4ax.com>,
Dick Adams <rdadams@smart.net> wrote:
>Problem #1: As a part of a parole, the parolee agrees to searches
>at the whim of his/her parole officer. This means a search of the
>parolee, his premi
|
|
|
Dick Adams wrote:
> <JPSHayes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does anybody know if the police can take my blood against my will?
>
> Problem #1: As a part of a parole, the parolee agrees to searches
> at the whim of his/her parole officer. This means a search
|
|
|
Dick Adams wrote, in part:
> Problem #1: As a part of a parole, the parolee agrees to
> searches at the whim of his/her parole officer. This means
> a search of the parolee, his premises, people living in the
> premises, and people who are simply the
|
|
|
[OP ("sav"), a resident of Pittsburgh, PA, signed a residential lease
renewal extending his term through the end of July 2007. Renewal was
offered by Landlord and Landlord's form was used. Landlord has
subsequently informed OP that: (1) Landlord inte
|
|
|
on 6/20/2006 7:48 AM Seth Breidbart said the following:
[Discussion of whether a lease is binding on new owner]
>
> There's often a clause near the beginning that states that the
> contract is binding on both parties, their heirs, assigns, etc. If
|
|
|
Hello,
My annual lease expires on June 30th, and my landlord has told me that
she plans to raise the rent from $1200 to $1450. Since this is an
increase of over 20% and I live in California, does she have to give me
60 days' notice, or does that onl
|
|
|
In article <2g2g92dvndll8fpslsj7mq45fn8bv36pns@4ax.com>,
Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Reminds me of a case that occurred several years ago. A guy smashed
>his car into a parked car. The parked car was at a meter that had
>expi
|
|
|
Timothy wrote, in part:
> [Y]ou saw all the other cars swerving. In retrospect, the
> best thing to do would have been to slow down and stay
> out of the way of the swerving cars.
Hunh? OP wrote, in part:
"My fiancee, the driver, immeadiately dec
|
|
|
John F. Carr wrote:
> In article <32gd92tfvco6b3hljgjicjn0v3ucn9qr0r@4ax.com>,
> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
<snip>
> >summary: You were doing 60 mph, topped a rise, saw a stopped car in
> >the road, but could not stop in time and
|
|
|
I wrote:
>Yep. If you hit a stationary object, it's almost always at least
>partly (mostly) your fault. In California hitting a stationary
>object is an automatic fail on your behind the wheel test.
>
>However, California uses "comparative negligen
|
|
|
T. Blando wrote:
> I told this story conservatively, and all has been documented. Any
> recommendations?
>
I am still not sure what the University did to you that would justify
having them pay you damages. If the problem is that you flunked ou
|
|
|
jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>summary: You were doing 60 mph, topped a rise, saw a stopped car
>>in the road, but could not stop in time and smashed into it. Your
>>car was totaled.
>
> That
|
|
