misc.legal.moderated

GT wrote: > I have been getting threatening letters of an unpaid RR subscription > supposedly going to be a sent to collection agency. I NEVER ordered > anything. But I am worried about their messing up my credit record. So > far I have not responded

tomusenet@gmail.com wrote: > I have some hypothetical questions regarding electronic privacy: > > 1) My girlfriend's harddrive failed. She took it out of her computer > and gave it to me and asked me to recover any data on it. I recovered > the dat

"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote in message news:vccj925n971t2h14lqimvbp0107f6aed09@4ax.com... > > T. Blando wrote: > >> I told this story conservatively, and all has been documented. Any >> recommendations? >> > > I am still no

--------------------------------------------------------------- AN E-BULLETIN LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL lii.law.cornell.edu --------------------------------------------------------------- The following four decisions have just

In article <jckl92he652tb0g8rca8d2o3c5r8v12mr5@4ax.com>, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote: > Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:54:31 -0400 from <bernie@fantasyfarm.com>: > > Only the Executive Branch > > has the tools of "compulsion" and so if the

<bernie@fantasyfarm.com> wrote: >Barry Gold wrote: >> And, in general, there is no way to force the executive to enforce the >> law. If the AG decides not to prosecute, nobody else can force him to >> do so. If the FCC (for example) decides not to i

In article <hckl92hee0t22ktv486gd0nout5inu3p2p@4ax.com>, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote: >Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:54:30 -0400 from Crusader george ><georgek@humboldt1.com>: >> the expired CA driver's license. >> I went to court and the

auh1000 wrote: > In Pakistan we follow the Transfer of Property Act 1882. Does Azad > Kashmir use this same act or does it have an equivalent.i will > appreciate an early response. Thank You Wow, we're really getting a lot of the international law q

on 6/22/2006 10:45 AM George said the following: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know how to deliver a summons to someone in S. Africa? > Well, I assume from your question there are two countries involved. South Africa, where the defendant lives, and

George wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know how to deliver a summons to someone in S. Africa? Assuming your suit was not filed in S.A. but in some other country, you probably have to follow the requirements of the Hague Convention, a treaty gover

"George" <atlantisms@yahoo.com> wrote: > Does anyone know how to deliver a summons to someone in S. Africa? In part it depends on where you are. If you are in South Africa it would be based on local law, and you should check with a local lawyer.

AndyS wrote: > It may be that the tenant was allowed to paint the walls during his > tenancy and painted colors which will need to be changed in order to make the > premises rentable again. If that is the case, the landlord is > justified in requir

on 6/22/2006 10:45 AM AndyS said the following: > ephedralover@hotmail.com wrote: >> A friend of mine is moving out of a house they have rented from a >> managment company for 6 years. They gave him a list of items that need >> to be done before he ca

ninotna@ailacs.net wrote: <snip> > answer given in light of what else you say above. That is > (particularly in the required light most favorable to the > prosecution), the arresting officer testified to having <snip> Ummmm, I believe

jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote: > Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote: >> >>I like that standard better than the other two. Scalia's standard >>of having a permanent surface water connection would leave out >>seasonal rivers, etc. as pointed out. A

This question involves probate for Texas which is a community property state. Bill and Janet have a net worth of about 3 million. ALL of their assets are held either JTwROS or POD to each other. The IRAs list each other as beneficiary. The o

<jackdecoy@yahoo.com> wrote: >Our employer has recently implemented a program where we are required >to sell another vendor's product as an add on to the product we sell. >Our employer is NOT paying us any commision for the sale of this >vendor's prod

jackdecoy@yahoo.com wrote: > Our employer has recently implemented a program where we are required > to sell another vendor's product as an add on to the product we sell. > Our employer is NOT paying us any commision for the sale of this > vendor's

ews@absamail.co.za wrote: > In order to facilitate the resolution of disputes between private parties > societies/nations have evolved time limits for the various procedures to > be completed for civil litigation. Having read the rest of your post

rm> I called the driver's insurance company, who has everything they need rm> but are "still trying to get their adjusters over". It's been over 2 rm> days and they haven't called yet. It's their problem. You have damages, you can fix them as you s

rick m wrote: > We called out insurance company, they said there is nothing they can > do. They wouldn't even give us advice. I called the driver's insurance > company, who has everything they need but are "still trying to get > their adjusters over

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:45:53 -0400, "rick m" <castufari@gmail.com> wrote: >We called out insurance company, they said there is nothing they can >do. They wouldn't even give us advice. I called the driver's insurance >company, who has everything they

rick m wrote: > On Monday an employee of a company was driving <snip> > through the > intersection (1 way stop), up over the curb then hit our front door, > caving it in. No one was hurt, though the mrs and daughter were sort of > freaked out. <sni

Seth Breidbart wrote: > >I can't see anybody getting any civil damages out of violations, > >despite Scalia's talk about the deterrent effect of civil remedies. > >After all, what is the injury? Shame of policemen seeing you in your > >undies? >

Stuart A. Bronstein wrote: > The courts have always had a love-hate relationship with the > exclusionary rule. It is not, by itself, constitutionally mandated. > But it has been seen to be the only remedy that would actually cause > the police not

Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote: >> Roberts, >> C. J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part >> and dissenting in part, in which Scalia and Thomas, JJ., >> joined. > I wonder what more the disenters would need before they grant a

tomusenet@gmail.com wrote:> She is threatening me with legal action for invading her privacy and > demands that I delete any data about her. > > Were any of my actions illegal? Andy writes: Look, Alice, this ain't rocket surgery. Here is

In article <ndcj92t0hlib0ha9969qcog6s0c14t0qi2@4ax.com>, <tomusenet@gmail.com> wrote: >2) My girlfriend freely gave me her e-mail passwords to regularly look >stuff up in her e-mail. After I found out about the cheating incident, >I looked through

In article <dc5u72tfa3mo62an640s02lcsotmblsi6m@4ax.com>, okonoval@verizon.net says... > > >Hi, > >My wife just got a ticket for "failure to inspect" the car (sticker was 3 >months overdue) >(in Princeton, NJ) with penalty $123 (hope no points, bu

-------------------------------------------------------------- AN E-BULLETIN LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL lii.law.cornell.edu --------------------------------------------------------------- The following four decisions have just

I just got a letter from the Mass. court notifying me of a default judgment for failure to answer interrogatories... I just received a letter from the layers with the interrogatories and a letter saying I never answered them with a copy that had been

My husband had credit cards, his accounts only, with a balance owing when he died. I was an authorized user on those accounts. They were not joint accounts. Most of our money was spent on doctors and hospitals, therefore I have very little money. I

In article <nbkl921utnvseknu44rvmnant4t5c8qr9e@4ax.com>, Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >In that case, Worth v. Selchow & Righter 827 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. >1987), the author of several books of trivia sued S&R because many, >if n

In article <lbkl92d4n485vfll4nsompbipt4cv87gm1@4ax.com>, Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >> Dick Adams <rdadams@smart.net> wrote: >> >>>Problem #1: As a part of a parole, the parolee agrees

In article <kbkl92hpu8tkg7gknck6v6i8kan992nb0l@4ax.com>, John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu> wrote: >I don't know about parole searches, but in DUI cases in some >states "I want a lawyer" is treated the same as "I am guilty." >The courts have decided that im

John F. Carr wrote: > I don't know about parole searches, but in DUI cases in some > states "I want a lawyer" is treated the same as "I am guilty." > The courts have decided that immediate testing is more important > than constitutional rights. Of

In article <9dcj92pue7cbfvcchooimm0sin2dcnvdcm@4ax.com>, <thomas.j.johnson@gmail.com> wrote: >Hello, > >My annual lease expires on June 30th, and my landlord has told me that >she plans to raise the rent from $1200 to $1450. Since this is an >incre

In article <7dcj92pa1trpv71joa781ivft0fc9bukj8@4ax.com>, I wrote: >Once upon a time one could plead as a defense in a civil action >that the other car's registration had expired and therefore the >driver was trespassing on the public road. I don't kno

Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote: > >> I'll add that CA used to use "last clear choice". In that case, >> OP would be completely out of luck, because his choice (to drive >> at a higher or lower sp

sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu> wrote: >> >>Once upon a time one could plead as a defense in a civil action >>that the other car's registration had expired and therefore the >>driver was trespassing on the public