|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following five decisions have just
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following five decisions have just
|
|
|
auh1000 wrote:
> In Pakistan we follow the Transfer of Property Act 1882. Does Azad
> Kashmir use this same act or does it have an equivalent.i will
> appreciate an early response. Thank You
Perhaps you can get an answer in the Usenet group soc.cu
|
|
|
I live in a condominium which is a cooperative governed by a Strata
Property Act. The act is written in fairly plain English so it is
easy to understand. For example it tells me that owners are entitled
to get certain information from the management
|
|
|
ephedralover@hotmail.com wrote:
> A friend of mine is moving out of a house they have rented from a
> managment company for 6 years. They gave him a list of items that need
> to be done before he can get his deposit back. They want the walls
> paint
|
|
|
bat wrote:
> k> Do you think i will win?Any questions?Thnx.
>
> What were you charged with, eventually? overspeeding 5mph?
Was not charged with speeding,,,,just dui
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> ninotna@ailacs.net wrote:
> <snip>
> > answer given in light of what else you say above. That is
> > (particularly in the required light most favorable to the
> > prosecution), the arresting officer te
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> ninotna@ailacs.net wrote:
> <snip>
> > answer given in light of what else you say above. That is
> > (particularly in the required light most favorable to the
> > prosecution), the arresting officer te
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> ninotna@ailacs.net wrote:
> <snip>
> > (particularly in the required light most favorable to the
> > prosecution), the arresting officer testified
> <snip>
> Ummmm, I believe when there's any possible abigui
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following five decisions have just
|
|
|
AndyS <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
>This question involves probate for Texas which is a community property
>state.
> Bill and Janet have a net worth of about 3 million. ALL of their
>assets are
>held either JTwROS or POD to each other. The IRAs
|
|
|
"AndyS" <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
> This question involves probate for Texas which is a community
> property state.
>
> Bill and Janet have a net worth of about 3 million. ALL of
> their assets are held either JTwROS or POD to each other. Th
|
|
|
A Michigan Attorney wrote:
> jackdecoy@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Our employer has recently implemented a program where we are required
> > to sell another vendor's product as an add on to the product we sell.
> > Our employer is NOT paying us any comm
|
|
|
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> jackdecoy@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Our employer has recently implemented a program where we are required
>> to sell another vendor's product as an add on to the product we sell.
>> Our employer is NOT p
|
|
|
Dear Colleagues:
I have been surprised by my complete inability to find pattern
deposition forms for a beneficiary vs. trustee dispute. Does anyone
have any suggestions or forms?
Thank you,
Daniel Reitman
|
|
|
OP wrote:
>> Q- how do/would the out of time rules apply eg. in civil litigation
>> when the nation is invaded unexpectedly and the judicial sytem
>> consequently becomes largely incapacitated ?
>"McGyver" wrote:
> When the crisis is over, the leg
|
|
|
n article <e1ir921bbv0q2740cvablh0q1dm0j0li5b@4ax.com>, "Mike Jacobs"
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> news@absamail.co.za wrote:
>
> > In order to facilitate the resolution of disputes between private parties
> > societies/nations have evolved ti
|
|
|
Jobeth66 wrote:
> rick m wrote:
> > We called out insurance company, they said there is nothing they can
> > do. They wouldn't even give us advice. I called the driver's insurance
> > company, who has everything they need but are "still trying to ge
|
|
|
bat wrote:
>
> More practical advise is - check the reputation of their insurance co.,
> usually the state has the information. That will give an idea if the wait
> worth it. i.e. is it usual practical delay, or deliberate screwing you.
>
>
A
|
|
|
In article <91ir92pc6ktcvn368lqtg5rh4p67igipv3@4ax.com>,
Frank <frank@frank.aspam> wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:45:53 -0400, "rick m" <castufari@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>We called out insurance company, they said there is nothing they can
>>do. The
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following five decisions have just
|
|
|
I won a small-claims judgement last year but sued the owner of the
business for which I was working. I've subpoened banks near where I
think he lives, but no bank has record of any account of his. Is there
another legal step I can take to get the money
|
|
|
Three months ago my 75-year-old mother slipped and fell on an upturned
carpet in the entrance of a facility of a very major organization. She
sustained a bad head injury and has had severe migraines and often
feels faint from the injury. She's been put
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> Now my question is: why was (most of) the above not all considered
> "heresay"? I know there's some exceptions to the heresay rules
> (excited utterance, etc.) but how does all this qualify?
It is hearsay. It's j
|
|
|
tomusenet@gmail.com wrote:
> I have some hypothetical questions regarding electronic privacy:
>
> [hypotheticals snipped]
>
> She is threatening me with legal action for invading her privacy and
> demands that I delete any data about her.
>
> We
|
|
|
Father is 74 and in good health. Single since mother passed away 7
years ago.
He'd like to "sign his house over" (not exactly a precise legal term
there) to my sister and me. Main impetus in his doing so would be for
nursing home/medicaid consi
|
|
|
My landlord initiated an eviction suit against me in JP Court (Austin, TX)
over my refusal
to pay unreasonable late fees. JP ruled in his favor (not much of a trial).
I've filed an Appeal.
I'm offering my landlord to settle the case before I submi
|
|
|
jimbradley@gmail.com wrote:
> I just got a letter from the Mass. court notifying me of a default
> judgment for failure to answer interrogatories... I just received a
> letter from the layers with the interrogatories and a letter saying I
> never a
|
|
|
jimbradley@gmail.com wrote:
> I just got a letter from the Mass. court notifying me of a default
> judgment for failure to answer interrogatories
That's what usually happens as a sanction if you completely ignore
written interrogatories from your op
|
|
|
<jimbradley@gmail.com> wrote:
>I just got a letter from the Mass. court notifying me of a default
>judgment for failure to answer interrogatories... I just received a
>letter from the layers with the interrogatories and a letter saying I
>never answe
|
|
|
Barb wrote:
> My husband had credit cards, his accounts only, with a balance owing
> when he died. I was an authorized user on those accounts. They were
> not joint accounts. Most of our money was spent on doctors and
> hospitals, therefore I hav
|
|
|
[Husband of OP (Barb) passed away owing outstanding balances or credit
cards. OP was an authorized user of the cards. OP has few liquid assets
and an excess of current expenses over income, which may be rectified
when she begins to receive a survivor's
|
|
|
In article <n0ir92h0ob1nf1msrb2fjhuq81l06rh90o@4ax.com>,
"Barb" <Bas623@verizon.net> wrote:
> My husband had credit cards, his accounts only, with a balance owing
> when he died. I was an authorized user on those accounts. They were
> not joint a
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
> My favorite case on this kind of issue is the Trivial Pursuit case
> from here in the 9th Circuit, though at least some other circuits
> have also come to the same conclusion.
> In that case, Wo
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> But in the case, OP was vising his friend who was _not_ on parole; his
> friend's roommate was, unbeknownst to OP.
Agreed -- OP did not consent to be searched. But the point of the
consent is it gives the cops a legitimat
|
|
|
In article <g0ir92p60hkqkr8aqoc12m8t0andu181o4@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>John F. Carr wrote:
>
>> I don't know about parole searches, but in DUI cases in some
>> states "I want a lawyer" is treated the same as "I am guilty.
|
|
|
The recent Surgeon's general report says second hand smoke is more
dangerous than previously thought. I live in a condo where smoke from
people in the lower floors travels upwards into my unit. Can I
approach the condo association to vote on banning sm
|
|
|
bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
> 1. Assume the 60 days rule is still in effect. OP has been
> renting for less than a year, but at the end of his lease will
> have been there for a full year. Landlord gives notice of
> increased rent 30 days be
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following five decisions have just
|
|