|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> > ninotna@ailacs.net wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > (particularly in the required light most favorable to the
> > > prosecution), the arresting officer testified
> > <snip>
> > Ummmm, I believ
|
|
|
Bernie Cosell wrote:
> 2. Failure to submit a sentencing factor to the jury is
> not 'structural' error. If a criminal defendant had counsel
> and was tried by an impartial adjudicator, there is a strong
> presumption that most constitutional errors
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> My undeerstanding is that sovereignty over Kashmir is disputed between
> Pakistan and India. However, the law you mention was (presumably)
> enacted by the British colonial administration back when India and
> Pakistan were uni
|
|
|
For the sake of argument; Let's say I have a pending civil suit for
breach of contract for a couple of former tenants.
The suits have been filed. However I nor the investigators have had any
luck finding these people to have them served.
Can I sub
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:45:58 -0400, "George" <atlantisms@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Hi all,
>Does anyone know how to deliver a summons to someone in S. Africa?
>Thank you.
Assuming you are not in South Africa, then the easiest approach is, as
otherw
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Al,
You live in a condo. This condo has a management company, perhaps to care
for the building and grounds. There is a written agreement governing their
activities but you believe they are also bound by a "Strata Act". You wish
to get meeting
|
|
|
Hello krakpot75@yahoo.com:
You wrote in conference misc.legal.moderated on Tue, 27 Jun 2006
13:20:24 -0400:
k> bat wrote:
k>>> Do you think i will win?Any questions?Thnx.
k>>
k>> What were you charged with, eventually? overspeeding 5mph?
|
|
|
"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>But OP was not talking about a trial, he was at a hearing on a motion
>to suppress evidence which his own (defense) atty had filed.
>Regardless of which side they will be taking in the ultimate trial, the
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:45:56 -0400, rdadams@smart.net (Dick Adams)
wrote:
>. . . .
>I do not think Rapanos will be a far reaching decision
>because it is so situation specific.
Not necessarily. What makes Rapanos important is that by requirin
|
|
|
On a recent re-run of The Practice (and, yes, I know "don't get your law
degree from TV shows" :)) they had a client who had killed her boy-friend
and then pled "self-defense" (I think it was a "battered-girlfriend"
situation. I only caught the tail-en
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:> You need probate because
> 1) the law says so,
What happens if I just ignore probate, assuming that no tax is
owed to the state or to the federal government ?
> 2) that way the court can make sure that Bill's deb
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:> >
> > 1) House (homestead) which is held jointly.
>
> Isn't that the same as JTWROS?
Andy replies: No. The deed says Bill and Janet ETUX... In Texas,
being a community property state, anything that is not as
|
|
|
I'm trying to write a legal situation in a novel idea I'm working on.
Let's run a couple of hypothetical situations if you're willing to
indulge me.
My main character has been listed as a personal represenative on a
relative's Will (we'll call him J
|
|
|
rdadams@smart.net (Dick Adams) wrote:
> A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>> jackdecoy@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>> Our employer has recently implemented a program where we are
>>> required to sell another vendor's product as an add on to
|
|
|
"Daniel R. Reitman" <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
> I have been surprised by my complete inability to find pattern
> deposition forms for a beneficiary vs. trustee dispute. Does anyone
> have any suggestions or forms?
Have you tried Matthew Ben
|
|
|
ews@absamail.co.za wrote:
> In article <e1ir921bbv0q2740cvablh0q1dm0j0li5b@4ax.com>, "Mike Jacobs"
> <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Having read the rest of your post, I fail to see how time limits play
> > any role at all in the saga of Bert, hi
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:45:55 -0400, news@absamail.co.za wrote:
>. . . .
>Some months after the neighbour reported Bert's death to me,
>I notified [by email for traceability] the local german embassy
>[who has record of Bert's 30 yr. s. african r
|
|
|
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/16/D8GCLEN02.html
|
|
|
> I suspect that he lacks coverage for this type of incident. Every
> homeowner's insurance policy I've seen contains a coverage exclusion
> for damages arising out of the use or maintenance of a motor vehicle.
No, homeowner's insurance policies h
|
|
|
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jobeth66 wrote:
>> rick m wrote:
>> > We called out insurance company, they said there is nothing they can
>> > do. They wouldn't even give us advice. I called the driver's insurance
>> > company,
|
|
|
DA> A fellow employee, formerly employed by an insurer, stated that the
DA> driver's insurer had tried to cheat us. In the circumstances I think
DA> our insurer would have been justified in filing suit against the driver
DA> to let him know his ins
|
|
|
"A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote in message
<I suspect that he lacks coverage for this type of incident. Every
homeowner's insurance policy I've seen contains a coverage exclusion for
damages arising out of the use or maintenance o
|
|
|
In article <fip2a2pf0atn1npc62f0tdpomevhfdgqvq@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>I suspect that he lacks coverage for this type of incident. Every
>homeowner's insurance policy I've seen contains a coverage exclusion
>for
|
|
|
A Michigan Attorney wrote:
> Jobeth66 wrote:
>
> > This part I don't understand. Why wouldn't YOUR homeowner's insurance
> > company do anything for you? If the damages exceed your deductible,
> > have your insurance company pay to repair the damag
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Hello!
I'm searching for information regarding lawsuits won using digitally
signed images as an evidence.
Especially, digitally signed documents processed with Kofax VRS.
Please point me!
Thanks in advance,
Michael
|
|
|
Hello , my husband and I have been renting a house in the Troy NY area,
we signed a lease , we our currently 6 months into our lease, the rent
is $950 per month we gave a security deposit($950) and a non-refundable
deposit for our dogs, we both have go
|
|
|
Bernie Cosell wrote:
> Scalia, J., filed a concurring opinion.
His opinion is really over the top. What business does he have
speculating on the guilt of innocence of (real) people who are not
parties to the case? It might be OK to do that in an
|
|
|
grayline88s wrote:
> I won a small-claims judgement last year but sued the owner of the
> business for which I was working. I've subpoened banks near where I
> think he lives, but no bank has record of any account of his. Is there
> another legal step
|
|
|
In article <8ip2a21eb4te3m38mo31tuh58p7dhh2hi7@4ax.com>,
grayline88s <garyplotkin88@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I won a small-claims judgement last year but sued the owner of the
>business for which I was working. I've subpoened banks near where I
>think he li
|
|
|
In article <8ip2a21eb4te3m38mo31tuh58p7dhh2hi7@4ax.com>,
"grayline88s" <garyplotkin88@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I won a small-claims judgement last year but sued the owner of the
> business for which I was working. I've subpoened banks near where I
> thi
|
|
|
"grayline88s" <garyplotkin88@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I won a small-claims judgement last year but sued the owner of the
> business for which I was working. I've subpoened banks near where
> I think he lives, but no bank has record of any account of his.
|
|
|
Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:19:34 -0400 from <slimick@gmail.com>:
> It is my belief that this statement made by the employee of this
> organization is critical to my mother's case. Am I correct here? I
> think that she needs to have this employee subpoenaed t
|
|
|
In article <7ip2a2dqtd13bmq92d1j55idlctv1fi48q@4ax.com>,
<slimick@gmail.com> wrote:
[OP's mother was injured in a slip&fall. She has an attorney. One
employee of the facility where she fell said, "You are the second
person today who fell on that ca
|
|
|
limick@gmail.com wrote:
> Three months ago my 75-year-old mother slipped and fell on an upturned
> carpet in the entrance of a facility of a very major organization.
<snip re: how badly Mom got hurt>
> after my mother fell, a clerk from who is employe
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Now my question is: why was (most of) the above not all considered
>> "heresay"? I know there's some exceptions to the heresay rules
>> (excited utterance, etc.)
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following two decisions have just a
|
|
|
<prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote in message
news:dip152t4kspa3tgji6aca159kfs4gqg44r@4ax.com...
> Not a lawyer but I believe it's basically a case of the judge simply
> having
> the other party actually write up the final order (i.e. do all the typ
|
|
|
Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:19:22 -0400 from zxcv <zxcv@faked.domain>:
> The house is his primary residence, built new in 1989 outside Buffalo,
> NY. I'm guessing it might have been $75,000 then and is maybe worth
> $90,000 today - not a lot of appreciation
|
|
|
zxcv wrote:
> Father is 74 and in good health. Single since mother passed away 7
> years ago.
>
> He'd like to "sign his house over" (not exactly a precise legal term
> there) to my sister and me. Main impetus in his doing so would be for
> nursin
|
|
|
zxcv <zxcv@faked.domain> wrote:
> Father is 74 and in good health. Single since mother passed away
> 7 years ago.
>
> He'd like to "sign his house over" (not exactly a precise legal
> term there) to my sister and me. Main impetus in his doing so
|
|
|
"In the event it is necessary for the tenant to terminate the lease
before expiration of the Term, the damages caused would be uncertain
and incalculable at the time of entering into this agreement.
Therefore, the parties agree that Tenant shall pay th
|
|
|
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:27:37 -0400, jimbradley@gmail.com wrote:
>I just got a letter from the Mass. court notifying me of a default
>judgment for failure to answer interrogatories... I just received a
>letter from the layers with the interrogatories
|
|
|
John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com> wrote:
> In article <n0ir92h0ob1nf1msrb2fjhuq81l06rh90o@4ax.com>,
> "Barb" <Bas623@verizon.net> wrote:
<snip>
>> My total
>> income loss since his death each month is approximately $3,000 and my
>> retire
|
|
|
Tony wrote:
> Stan Brown wrote:
>
>>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:49:35 -0500 from rick++ <rick303@hotmail.com>:
>>
>>
>>>Every year I get a letter from Experian saying I am entitled to free
>>>credit report because of the number of credit inquiries has
>>
|
|
|
Brogan wrote:
> I received a letter from a mortgage company (unsolicited) stating that
> I met their criteria based on information obtained from a credit
> bureau.
>
> I didn't give them permission and I was wondering if that is legal? I
> live in
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote, in part:
> And the [9th Circuit] was wrong [in Worth v. Selchow & Righter],
> because while true facts cannot be copyrighted, the stuff he made
> up required creativity and should have been protected.
To clarify, do you think F
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>> The court's conclusion was that no matter how much time and
>> effort went into collecting all that trivia, things that are
>> factual cannot be protected. Crea
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii.law.cornell.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------
The following two decisions have just a
|