|
|
grayline88s wrote:
> I won a small-claims judgement last year but sued the owner of the
> business for which I was working. I've subpoened banks near where I
> think he lives, but no bank has record of any account of his. Is there
> another legal step
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:07:54 -0400, "Manoj" <manojb@mailcity.com>
wrote:
>Bernie Cosell wrote:
>> 2. Failure to submit a sentencing factor to the jury is
>> not 'structural' error. If a criminal defendant had counsel
>> and was tried by an impartia
|
|
|
"Stan" <texas.stan@yahoo.com> wrote:
> For the sake of argument; Let's say I have a pending civil suit
> for breach of contract for a couple of former tenants.
>
> The suits have been filed. However I nor the investigators have
> had any luck find
|
|
|
Alfred Kaufmann wrote, in part:
> I live in a condominium which is a cooperative governed
> by a Strata Property Act.
Always a good idea to indicate where you are. By that, I mean
something like "British Columbia" and not "in front of the computer,
|
|
|
bat <bat@bats.com> wrote:
> Hello krakpot75@yahoo.com:
> You wrote in conference misc.legal.moderated on Tue, 27 Jun 2006
> 13:20:24 -0400:
> k> bat wrote:
> k>>> Do you think i will win?Any questions?Thnx.
> k>>
> k>> What were you charg
|
|
|
Daniel R. Reitman wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:45:56 -0400, rdadams@smart.net (Dick Adams)
> wrote:
>
> >. . . .
>
> >I do not think Rapanos will be a far reaching decision
> >because it is so situation specific.
>
> Not necessarily. What mak
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:07:48 -0400, prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>On a recent re-run of The Practice (and, yes, I know "don't get your law
>degree from TV shows" :)) . . . .
[Defense counsel finds publicly available evidence that defendant
comm
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> On a recent re-run of The Practice <snip> one of the lawyers was doing some research
<and found harmful info about past acts by his client from publicly
available sources>
>The partners told her that she couldn't tell
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
[Fictional lawyer is defending a client who killed her boyfriend in
self-defense. The lawyer finds the client's picture in an old
newspaper article detailing a similar killing, but under a different
name. The lawyer
|
|
|
"AndyS" <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
> Barry Gold wrote:> You need probate because
>> 1) the law says so,
>
> What happens if I just ignore probate, assuming that no tax is
> owed to the state or to the federal government ?
The problem is t
|
|
|
"AndyS" <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:> >
>> > 1) House (homestead) which is held jointly.
>>
>> Isn't that the same as JTWROS?
>
> Andy replies: No. The deed says Bill and Janet ETUX... In Texas,
> being a co
|
|
|
Thomas wrote:
<novel plot concerns an older, superseded Will, with Jane as PR, that
was admitted to probate before a newer Will, with a different PR, was>
> Am I correct in understanding that
> Jane has broad discretionary powers to look into any
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:07:46 -0400, "Thomas" <tom63006@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>I'm trying to write a legal situation in a novel idea I'm working on.
>Let's run a couple of hypothetical situations if you're willing to
>indulge me.
>[How to handle a w
|
|
|
"Thomas" <tom63006@hotmail.com> wrote:
> My main character has been listed as a personal represenative on a
> relative's Will (we'll call him John). However, another person
> (also a relative, named Jane) has filed an older Will of the
> deceased wh
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:07:44 -0400, "Stuart A. Bronstein"
<spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>"Daniel R. Reitman" <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
>> I have been surprised by my complete inability to find pattern
>> deposition forms for a beneficiary v
|
|
|
===
[Revised 1 August 2005]
MISC.LEGAL.MODERATED POSTING INSTRUCTIONS
1. Posting should be done in the ordinary manner by using news
software. DO NOT MAIL POSTINGS TO THE MODERATOR. If you can't post using news
softw
|
|
|
In article <r8taa25coifev8bb8nirogt291eeehubrs@4ax.com>,
William Brenner <wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
>http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/16/D8GCLEN02.html
The article quotes a city lawyer: "You can sue your spouse
for divorce, but you can
|
|
|
William Brenner wrote:
> http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/16/D8GCLEN02.html
I thought we've discussed this one here before.
If Gokey had backed the city dump truck into an unrelated party's car,
would Gokey or the city have been liable?
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:07:42 -0400, William Brenner
<wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
>http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/16/D8GCLEN02.html
Believe it or not, there actually is precedent in California that one
cannot sue oneself. Lodi v. Lodi
|
|
|
rick m wrote:
> On Monday an employee of a company was driving around on company
> business when he apparently "blacked out". This happened on the street
> that intersects in front of our home. His vehicle went through the
> intersection (1 way stop
|
|
|
In article <c8taa2908lip4glc81re2g61ch6ce4q5l9@4ax.com>,
"unfortunate tenant" <wdella1971@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I cannot afford a lawyer and the
> complaint is active and on file and I refuse to give the landlord a
> forwarding address, any suggesti
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:07:35 -0400, "Manoj" <manojb@mailcity.com>
wrote:
>Bernie Cosell wrote:
>> Scalia, J., filed a concurring opinion.
>His opinion is really over the top. What business does he have
>speculating on the guilt of innocence of (
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>> It is hearsay. It's just subject to an exception. There are
>> several types of exceptions, one of which is that the other side
>> simply doesn't bother to ob
|
|
|
xyzer@hotmail.com wrote:
I rent the apartment on Jan 1st.
> "In the event it is necessary for the tenant to terminate the lease
> before expiration of the Term, the damages caused would be uncertain
> and incalculable at the time of entering into
|
|
|
xyzer@hotmail.com wrote:
> "In the event it is necessary for the tenant to terminate the
> lease before expiration of the Term, the damages caused would be
> uncertain and incalculable at the time of entering into this
> agreement. Therefore, the pa
|
|
|
William Brenner <wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
> Tony wrote:
>> Stan Brown wrote:
>>
>>>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:49:35 -0500 from rick++ <rick303@hotmail.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Every year I get a letter from Experian saying I am entitled to free
>>>>cr
|
|
|
I just posted this in misc.legal and found this group that may have some
input to offer.
I work for an international company based in the USA that has field
operations throughout the US including California. I live in Illinois and my
state as w
|
|
|
"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> John F. Carr wrote:
>> In Minnesota test refusal is conclusive proof of DUI. There are
>> eight alternative ways to commit the crime and one of them is
>> refusing a chemical test.
>
> This is not my
|
|
|
<veg_all@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The recent Surgeon's general report says second hand smoke is more
> dangerous than previously thought. I live in a condo where smoke from
> people in the lower floors travels upwards into my unit.
> Can I approach th
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com>:
>> In the normal case no notice is required
>> by either landlord of tenant at the end of the term of a written
>> lease - the tenancy simply expires.
>
|
|
|
bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
> I agree with your analysis, but do you see the anomaly created here?
> If the landlord gives notice of intent to raise the rent, he has in
> effect offered a new tenancy, which the tenant is free to accept or
> de
|
|
