|
|
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:21:59 -0400, apirion@gmail.com wrote:
>Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
>would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
>benefits -- how does it hurt them? As I understand
|
|
|
Hi,
I've a question regarding the legal use of an initial for a name. Can
someone with a name change (by court order) to something like
"J. Anthony Jones" legally use "John" or another name legally as a
substitution for the initial "J."? It would
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>bat <bat@bats.com> wrote:
>> Hello krakpot75@yahoo.com:
>> You wrote in conference misc.legal.moderated on Tue, 27 Jun 2006
>> 13:20:24 -0400:
>
>
>> k> bat wrote:
>> k>>> Do you think i will win?Any question
|
|
|
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:42:30 -0400, "GT" <GeorgeThomasULL@gmail.com>
wrote:
>I have been getting threatening letters of an unpaid RR subscription
>supposedly going to be a sent to collection agency. I NEVER ordered
>anything. But I am worried about
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:18:47 -0400, "Timothy"
<Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
>
>ComCast Personal News Groups wrote:
>>My question is, would I be held chargeable if an altercation
>> were to take place? If he swung first at either my wife
|
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:35:24 -0400, obfusciatrist@gmail.com wrote:
>I've been roped into helping my father-in-law with his estate planning
>(which, suddenly, has become very important to him). Unfortunately he
>doesn't want to get lawyers involved an
|
|
|
news@absamail.co.za wrote:
In article <e1ir921bbv0q2740cvablh0q1dm0j0li5b@4ax.com>, "Mike Jacobs"
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Having read the rest of your post, I fail to see how time limits play
> > > any role at all in the saga of Bert,
|
|
|
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:28:20 -0400, Rachel
<Rachel_8587@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
>If someone can point me towards some way to help my sister, I would be
>extremely grateful. In a nutshell, at 18 my sister married an abusive
>man, stuck it out 25
|
|
|
In article <cubfa25cjk789fdh23b3su9e5grumf45n5@4ax.com>,
Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
>Believe it or not, there actually is precedent in California that one
>cannot sue oneself. Lodi v. Lodi, 219 Cal. Rptr. 116 (Cal. App.
>1985).
|
|
|
jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
> William Brenner <wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
>>http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/16/D8GCLEN02.html
>
> The article quotes a city lawyer: "You can sue your spouse
> for divorce, but you can't sue your
|
|
|
On 2 Jul 2006, jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
> * * *
> http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/16/D8GCLEN02.html
> . . . quotes a city lawyer: "You can sue your spouse for divorce,
> but you can't sue your spouse for negligence, They're a ma
|
|
|
In article <bubfa2lnmnp895lg1kgtplm5bb9h1b4djo@4ax.com>,
rick m <castufari@gmail.com> wrote:
>I called Nationwide both locally and nationally, they said that we have
>to take it up with his insurance company. If we want Nationwide to go
>to bat for
|
|
|
> Kennedy, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered
> the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts II-A and
> III, in which Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ.,
> joined, an opinion with respect to Parts I and IV, in which
> Robe
|
|
|
unfortunate tenant wrote:
> Hello , my husband and I have been renting a house in the Troy NY area,
> we signed a lease , we our currently 6 months into our lease, the rent
> is $950 per month we gave a security deposit($950) and a non-refundable
>
|
|
|
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:35:20 -0400, Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net>
wrote:
>Can a government agency be charged with a crime, or sued civilly for
>conspiracy, or whatever, for not enforcing the law? Just curious after
>Bush said "Catch and releas
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It is hearsay. It's just subject to an exception. There are
>>> several types of exceptions, one of wh
|
|
|
A car hit my parked car in a private lot in Minneapolis, MN. Damage is
$2500. I do not have collision insurance on this vehicle.
The driver left a note, then left the scene. The driver does not own
the car. Between the note and a couple of visits
|
|
|
ews@absamail.co.za wrote:
>>* A somewhat mentally incompetent testator's will needed
>>rectification.
nospam wrote:
> whether a testator is "incompetent" in the
> testamentary capacity sense of that term ..
> are not "facts" (or "details") but,
|
|
|
"Dave" <dave@nospam.com> wrote:
> I work for an international company based in the USA that has
> field operations throughout the US including California. I live in
> Illinois and my state as well as others including California have
> specific labo
|
|
|
(Riverside, CA)
Last night, my 1998 Camaro was picked up by the dealer for non-payment.
This is an in-house finance deal: the dealer financed the purchase. The
problem is that the payments were current. I have proof of the last 6
payments having
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:08:56 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
wrote:
>In article <eqd092193gj34g9d5k39r43v9cvd2d5k03@4ax.com>,
> <JPSHayes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>They conducted the search of the house and then asked me if I had been
>>taking
|
|
|
In article <ttbfa2h8j7lgusgprkb9opbdk99npd4i7b@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>The MN statute may give the same penalty for failure to take the test as
>for DUI itself.
If the penalty is limited to license suspension
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:08:54 -0400, "steveo" <gnsemail@cox.net> wrote:
>Hello--I hope you can help me understand what the liability might be
>for this incident which happened to my fiancee and I on Memorial Day
>weekend.
>
>We were driving on the l
|
|
|
Hi,
I was renting a apartment in chicago with a roomie. (no lease, month to
month, all verbal with both my roomie and landlord). I left that place
last week with proper notification to the landlord and everything is
fine - Except my roomate gave me a
|
|
|
On Tue, 30 May 2006 07:54:36 -0400, "vic gate" <gate000@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Hello I send some important papers by POSTMART (certified mail) and
>they got lost. I have claimed but the only response the post have given
>me is that this papers aren't i
|
|
