|
|
I work for a Bar Association and a lawyer friend of mine was surprised
to hear me say that I had deliberately chosen a female attorney over a
male for my divorce proceedings. He said he'd had a female client
recently, who decided after spending consult
|
|
|
apirion@gmail.com wrote:
> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
> would hurt an employer to have a former employee be approved for UI
> benefits -- how does it hurt them? As I understand it, they will do
> almost anythi
|
|
|
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:21:22 -0400 from <nobody@spamcop.net>:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:21:59 -0400, apirion@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
> >would hurt an employer to have a former employee be
|
|
|
<sebspiers@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7qpha1ho2ldpfjf1vhjba0u4m8ljspqfrm@4ax.com...
>I have a quick query really.
>
> My name is Mr Spiers, and I want to aquire Spiers.com for my family for
> obvious reasons (homepages, email addresses, etc)
|
|
|
nameless wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a question regarding the legal use of an initial for a name. Can
> someone with a name change (by court order) to something like
> "J. Anthony Jones" legally use "John" or another name legally as a
> substitution f
|
|
|
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:21:20 -0400 from nameless <nameless@simple.net>:
> I've a question regarding the legal use of an initial for a name. Can
> someone with a name change (by court order) to something like
> "J. Anthony Jones" legally use "John" or an
|
|
|
Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can it be
used like on labeling bluejeans "certified organic bluejeans"?
Thanks!
|
|
|
Ken Lay avoids conviction the only way he can; takes case to St. Peter.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1210472,00.html
I was wondering about the effect of Lay's demise on ongoing litigation.
With the criminal case extinguished, do the
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:70mdd11alfi87d3tn32a231f5rb4ai73bj@4ax.com...
> In article <g888d1thii56rpsn3kgj9ubbe99vq89ib9@4ax.com>,
> Scott Hedrick <dinehnm@yahoo.net> wrote:
>
>>"Fair market value" is defined as what
|
|
|
p> The stop isn't legal JUST because the cop's "hunch" turned out to be
p> right. If the cop didn't have legal cause (i.e. "probable cause") to
p> make the stop, nothing that resulted from it is legal.
If the cop turned out to be right, then anythi
|
|
|
nobody@spamcop.net wrote:
>
>
> I suggest videotaping the encounters. Stay in the car but record what
> occurs. Or ask a trusted couple of friends to acompany you in a
> second car and have them stop a short ways back, far enough to not
> look
|
|
|
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> [Fictional lawyer is defending a client who killed her boyfriend in
> self-defense. The lawyer finds the client's picture in an old
> newspaper article detailing
|
|
|
AndyS <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
>
>Barry Gold wrote:> You need probate because
>> 1) the law says so,
>
>What happens if I just ignore probate, assuming that no tax is
>owed to the state or to the federal government ?
You still need probat
|
|
|
Hello all, well my mom just died and my dad is bed ridden with
alzimers.
How do I claim the life insurance money for my moms funeral expenses
if my dad is the benificiary of the insurance policy.
I don't think there is a Power of Attorney in effect.
|
|
|
My mother signed General (durable) and Medical Powers of Attorney back
in 1993, when she was just beginning to have memory problems. As her
daughter, I was named primary agent with my brother as successor agent.
She has now become incapacitated, dia
|
|
|
The dept secretary at my (non-healthcare-related) company insists on
opening sealed envelopes containing medical information of employees
intended for Healthcare/Insurance companies.
The Healthcare company requires the information to be submitted by th
|
|
|
John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu> wrote:
> In article <cubfa25cjk789fdh23b3su9e5grumf45n5@4ax.com>,
> Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
>>Believe it or not, there actually is precedent in California that one
>>cannot sue oneself. Lodi v. Lod
|
|
|
I am a proponent for a moderated newsgroup and the question has come
up of legal liability of moderators for material that is posted on the
newsgroup, for example, hate speech, copyright violation and libel.
Are there any resources that I could read ab
|
|
|
On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:20:48 -0400, "Manoj" <manojb@mailcity.com>
wrote:
>> Kennedy, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered
>> the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts II-A and
>> III, in which Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Bre
|
|
|
I have lived in an apartment in Midwest City Ok. for 5 years now and my
lease is due to expire on October 31st of this year. Ten days ago my
central air quit working and the maintenance came to look at it the day
after I called and basically told me it
|
|
|
"Daniel R. Reitman" <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote in message
news:fepd82h1jpfl09nf6uleh3plq7tk36fhd7@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:41:53 -0400, "Scott Hedrick"
> <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Florida has a law that more or less
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> That's basically what I was thinking myself; that it didn't fall
> under any exception but just that the opposing lawyer didn't
> object (which also makes me wonder WHY the opposing lawyers keep
> letting things lik
|
|
|
Consider this situation:
Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve. Eve
doesn't like driving to the post office to pick up and sign for
certified mail, so she tells Adam that she'll be charging him $35.00
from now on to pi
|
|
|
<drj10101@gmail.com> wrote:
>A car hit my parked car in a private lot in Minneapolis, MN. Damage is
>$2500. I do not have collision insurance on this vehicle.
>
>The driver left a note, then left the scene. The driver does not own
>the car. Betwe
|
|
|
drj10101@gmail.com wrote:
> A car hit my parked car in a private lot in Minneapolis, MN. Damage is
> $2500. I do not have collision insurance on this vehicle.
>
> The driver left a note, then left the scene. The driver does not own
> the car. Be
|
|
|
<drj10101@gmail.com> wrote:
<My question is whether the driver has any responsibility here. If I'm
unable to get any payment from the
owner, can I try filing a claim against the driver? Or should I file the
initial claim against both>
If the
|
|
|
[Per drj10101, drj10101's parked car was hit in Minneapolis. Driver
and owner of the car that struck drj10101's car are different persons.
drj10101 has been unable to get satisfaction from the owner and is
suing in small claims (in Minnesota, "concili
|
|
|
drj10101@gmail.com wrote:
> A car hit my parked car in a private lot in Minneapolis, MN. Damage is
> $2500. I do not have collision insurance on this vehicle.
That doesn't matter to your right to claim legal compensation for
damages from the perso
|
|
|
Does New Jersey law allow for recall elections?
I am asking this question because the shutting down of New Jersey's
Horse Racing industry and its Casino industry make no sense to me
other than as a fiscally irresponsible political ploy.
Dick
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>First, the number of fact "facts" is so small with respect to the
>entire body of work used that the amount of damages would be
>negligible.
>
>Additionally, there is the issue that the author rep
|
|
|
In article <97taa255m9ro37vjbp4l6hfsaptd2ql4en@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Additionally, there is the issue that the author represented them as
>facts. He shouldn't be able to call them facts, and then say
>"GOTC
|
|
|
In article <b7taa295k0q1mukvpor72vgoj38b8brd14@4ax.com>,
<Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Seth Breidbart wrote, in part:
>> And the [9th Circuit] was wrong [in Worth v. Selchow & Righter],
>> because while true facts cannot be copyrighted, the stuff h
|
|
|
In article <s8bna2hdpemrom4t0tgeu04kus8prkofu3@4ax.com>,
Tony <tony23IDONTLIKESPAM@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> At the moment, he still has the vehicle. What options and/or recourse do
> I have? Even if I accept the car back, is there anything I can do
|
|
|
Tony wrote:
> (Riverside, CA)
>
> Last night, my 1998 Camaro was picked up by the dealer for non-payment.
> This is an in-house finance deal: the dealer financed the purchase. The
> problem is that the payments were current. I have proof of the la
|
|
|
Tony <tony23IDONTLIKESPAM@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> (Riverside, CA)
>
> Last night, my 1998 Camaro was picked up by the dealer for
> non-payment. This is an in-house finance deal: the dealer financed
> the purchase. The problem is that the payments
|
|
|
nobody@spamcop.net wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:08:54 -0400, "steveo" <gnsemail@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >Hello--I hope you can help me understand what the liability might be
> >for this incident which happened to my fiancee and I on Memorial Day
> >
|
|
|
kalyankp78@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I was renting a apartment in chicago with a roomie. (no lease, month to
> month, all verbal with both my roomie and landlord). I left that place
> last week with proper notification to the landlord and everything is
|
|
|
kalyankp78@gmail.com wrote:
> I was renting a apartment in chicago with a roomie. (no lease,
> month to month, all verbal with both my roomie and landlord). I
> left that place last week with proper notification to the landlord
> and everything is f
|
|
|
What is a better description for the mechanism described below ?
As a lay person, unintentionally forced to investigate law, I've often
noticed the mechanism of "one case reinforcing/confirming a
second case, which in turn reinforces the first case".
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:kdpd821nvokva39729qlqchgfl6ct4eelp@4ax.com...
> In article <e76782d6t3ohuj7ea5410qbhcpep24gfit@4ax.com>,
> Scott Hedrick <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>He *did* say that we (citi
|
|
