|
|
m> Why DO women clients choose female attorneys - over males - when they do
m> seek out an attorney?
Because women think that another woman will better understand them.
m> Why do some women ( and men) prefer an attorney of the opposite sex?
m>
|
|
|
mjelley wrote:
> My friend says there is an underlying sexual (not gender) reason for
> choosing an attorney of opposite sex. Why then would a heterosexual
> female client deliberately seek the advice of a female attorney?
Without getting all Freud
|
|
|
"mjelley" wrote ..
>I work for a Bar Association and a lawyer friend of mine was surprised
> to hear me say that I had deliberately chosen a female attorney over a
> male for my divorce proceedings. He said he'd had a female client
> recently, who
|
|
|
>I work for a Bar Association and a lawyer friend of mine was surprised
>to hear me say that I had deliberately chosen a female attorney over a
>male for my divorce proceedings. He said he'd had a female client
>recently, who decided after spending con
|
|
|
mjelley wrote:
> Why do some women ( and men) prefer an attorney of
> the opposite sex? All of this presumes that the male and female
> attorneys are equally schooled, equally paid and equally successful.
> My friend says there is an underlying sex
|
|
|
In article <59m2b2ppq8q67vuq18j4hsvjh97qcj0mgm@4ax.com>,
JSmith <jsmith246@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
>apirion@gmail.com wrote:
>> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
>> would hurt an employer to have a former employee be
|
|
|
In article <39m2b297neap4j1t3flvit2il2arjeodc9@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:21:22 -0400 from <nobody@spamcop.net>:
>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:21:59 -0400, apirion@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >Have no know
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:21:22 -0400 from <nobody@spamcop.net>:
>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:21:59 -0400, apirion@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
>>> would hurt an employer to ha
|
|
|
"JSmith" <jsmith246@mailinator.com> wrote:
> I have never heard of an employer protesting an unemployment
> claim. Many probably object to the taxation levels, of course,
> like all taxes, but not to specific claims, in my experience.
I have seen
|
|
|
In article <59m2b2ppq8q67vuq18j4hsvjh97qcj0mgm@4ax.com>,
"JSmith" <jsmith246@mailinator.com> wrote:
> I have never heard of an employer protesting an unemployment claim.
> Many probably object to the taxation levels, of course, like all
> taxes, bu
|
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:32:00 -0400, "Scott Hedrick"
<diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
><sebspiers@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:7qpha1ho2ldpfjf1vhjba0u4m8ljspqfrm@4ax.com...
>>I have a quick query really.
>> My name is Mr Spiers, and I
|
|
|
>I tried to get scotthedrick.com. For several months, the site did not exist,
>because the owner was simply holding the name, and ignored my attempts at
>communication. I finally settled on scotthedrick.net, and .org was available
>but I did not get
|
|
|
kress1963nov22@yahoo.com wrote:
> Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can it be
> used like on labeling bluejeans "certified organic bluejeans"?
>
It's not a trademark per se. But unless your bluejeans truly are made
fro
|
|
|
In article <s8m2b216ar07dbr65oketp8pekt8i88olh@4ax.com>,
kress1963nov22@yahoo.com <kress1963nov22@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark?
No. it is not a 'trademark'.
The USDA restricts the use of the term
|
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:31:51 -0400, "kress1963nov22@yahoo.com"
<kress1963nov22@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can it be
>used like on labeling bluejeans "certified organic bluejeans"?
>Thanks!
"Or
|
|
|
kress1963nov22@yahoo.com wrote:
> Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can it be
> used like on labeling bluejeans "certified organic bluejeans"?
> Thanks!
A trademark applies to the logo or name ONE company uses in the cond
|
|
|
kress1963nov22@yahoo.com wrote:
> Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can it be
> used like on labeling bluejeans "certified organic bluejeans"?
> Thanks!
>
Certifiably Organic is a registered trademark of Organic Crop
I
|
|
|
In article <o8m2b2hda6jpb99rb2tnb3rk4p2dj1v1dk@4ax.com>,
Scott Hedrick <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
>news:70mdd11alfi87d3tn32a231f5rb4ai73bj@4ax.com...
>> In article <g888d1thii56rpsn3kgj
|
|
|
Shortly after Kelo was handed down, Scott Hedrick wrote, in part:
>>> "Fair market value" is defined as what a willing and able
>>> buyer will pay, NOT what the seller is asking.
"Seth Breidbart" wrote, in part:
>> I own several unique books (e.g. t
|
|
|
bat wrote:
> If the cop turned out to be right, then anything that prompted him/her to
> make the stop, automatically becames probable cause, with the probability
> being 100%.
Sorry, that's not the standard. You seem to be assuming that law is
b
|
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:31:37 -0400, prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>Ok, that sounds good. But just out of curiosity, what would keep a lawyer
>from sending an anonymous note or phone call to the DA and saying "hey,
>check out the news article in the
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> "a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client...if:
> (2) the client has used the lawyer's services to perpetrate
> a crime or fraud;
> (3) the client insists upon pursuing an objective that the
> lawyer consider
|
|
|
[Steve's mother passed away. Steve's father is the beneficiary of a
life insurance policy on which Steve's mother is the named insured.
Steve's father is incapacitated to some extent by Alzheimer's disease.
Steve is unsure whether a power of attorney
|
|
|
I'm a Texas resident who owns a minority of the stock in a
privately-held Delaware C corp. No stock certificate has been issued.
Is it possible to abandon ownership of all of this stock? I wouldn't be
compensated in any way, and am not related to any
|
|
|
"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in message
news:29taa2t9rh12rjgfgcgn5oemq46mq2g50h@4ax.com...
> Yes, they have value. But they are not valid payment for services of
> an employee.
If the coupons are not used, then they have n
|
|
|
"Beth S" <eshuff21@verizon.net> wrote:
> The banks are refusing to accept the POA since it's so old. I'm
> trying to get her into assisted living but can't use her funds to
> pay for it.
I don't know which state you're in, but in California I'd
|
|
|
Beth S wrote:
[senile mom gave a POA long ago]
>
> The banks are refusing to accept the POA since it's so old. I'm trying
> to get her into assisted living but can't use her funds to pay for it.
>
>
> Can we get another POA without primary id
|
|
|
Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:31:26 -0400 from H9 <hcq90210@yahoo.com>:
> The dept secretary at my (non-healthcare-related) company insists on
> opening sealed envelopes containing medical information of employees
> intended for Healthcare/Insurance companies.
|
|
|
H9 <hcq90210@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The dept secretary at my (non-healthcare-related) company
> insists on opening sealed envelopes containing medical
> information of employees intended for Healthcare/Insurance
> companies.
>
> The Healthcare compan
|
|
|
H9 wrote:
> The dept secretary at my (non-healthcare-related) company insists on
> opening sealed envelopes containing medical information of employees
> intended for Healthcare/Insurance companies.
Just who is it that is giving these sealed envelop
|
|
|
In article <79bna2lhkf58gn3ufbblp1isv3esvah6jt@4ax.com>,
Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote:
>> Kennedy, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered
>> the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts II-A and
>> III, in which Stevens, Souter,
|
|
|
[Air conditioning in apartment of Midwest City, Oklahoma OP (Snowfem)
went out and OP is angry over timeliness of landlord's response. OP is
leaving due to the incident and fear of a repeat, as OP asserts that
sleep is more important to OP than it is t
|
|
|
"Barry Gold" <bgold@nyx.net> wrote in message
news:s4r2225mcd3h18skfer0eqi5cv7mv9lgt8@4ax.com...
> >"BoyntonStu" <stu@aaronj.com> wrote in message
> [snip]
>>> Has there ever been a prosecution fot not swearing the Juror Oath?
>>>
>>> (I do no
|
|
|
on 7/9/2006 12:31 PM Scott Hedrick said the following:
> "Daniel R. Reitman" <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote in message
> news:fepd82h1jpfl09nf6uleh3plq7tk36fhd7@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:41:53 -0400, "Scott Hedrick"
>> <diespammers-dinehnm
|
|
|
on 6/30/2006 12:07 PM Barry Gold said the following:
> In article <8ip2a21eb4te3m38mo31tuh58p7dhh2hi7@4ax.com>,
> grayline88s <garyplotkin88@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> [OP asks how to collect Judgment]
> First of all, you can ask the court for a hearing w
|
|
|
Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:31:07 -0400 from Jim Blackburn <wqgzasx02
@sneakemail.com.invalid>:
> Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve. Eve
> doesn't like driving to the post office to pick up and sign for
> certified mail, so s
|
|
|
In article <18m2b258q4anhvtft56moknmivhk5918vv@4ax.com>,
Jim Blackburn <wqgzasx02@sneakemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Consider this situation:
>
>Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve. Eve
>doesn't like driving to the post o
|
|
|
"Jim Blackburn" <wqgzasx02@sneakemail.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:18m2b258q4anhvtft56moknmivhk5918vv@4ax.com...
> Consider this situation:
>
> Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve. Eve
> doesn't like driving to t
|
|
|
In article <18m2b258q4anhvtft56moknmivhk5918vv@4ax.com>,
Jim Blackburn <wqgzasx02@sneakemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>Consider this situation:
>
>Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve. Eve
>doesn't like driving to the post o
|
|
|
Jim Blackburn wrote:
>Adam sends certified mail to Eve. Eve
> doesn't like driving to the post office to pick up and sign for
> certified mail, so she tells Adam that she'll be charging him $35.00
> from now on to pick up and sign for his certified
|
|
|
Jim Blackburn <wqgzasx02@sneakemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Consider this situation:
>
> Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve.
> Eve doesn't like driving to the post office to pick up and sign
> for certified mail, so sh
|
|
|
In article <18m2b258q4anhvtft56moknmivhk5918vv@4ax.com>,
Jim Blackburn <wqgzasx02@sneakemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve. Eve
> doesn't like driving to the post office to pick up and sign
|
|
|
Q1) If a city, state, other governmental organization takes a property
for eminent domain purposes, what happens to any leins on the property,
ie the mortgage, second, mechanics leins, etc?
Q2) What happens to prepayment penalities, etc, do cities
|
|
|
"Paul Cassel" <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> If you have uninsured
motorist coverage on your car, file a claim with your insurance company
Generally speaking, Uninsured Motorists coverage usually applies to Bodily
Injury. Some states allow you
|
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:30:53 -0400, "Mike Jacobs"
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>drj10101@gmail.com wrote:
>> A car hit my parked car in a private lot in Minneapolis, MN. Damage is
>> $2500. I do not have collision insurance on this vehicle.
>T
|
|
|
Ruth wrote:
> If the driver owns an insured vehicle, you may have some recourse against
> the driver as well.
I doubt very much that there is any state in the USA where the actual
driver's tort liability to the person whose property he damaged depen
|
|
|
Ruth wrote:
> If the driver owns an insured vehicle, you may have some recourse against
> the driver as well.
I doubt very much that there is any state in the USA where the actual
driver's tort liability to the person whose property he damaged depen
|
|
|
Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:30:51 -0400 from Dick Adams <rdadams@smart.net>:
> Does New Jersey law allow for recall elections?
>
> I am asking this question because the shutting down of New Jersey's
> Horse Racing industry and its Casino industry make no sen
|
|
|
Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:30:51 -0400 from Dick Adams <rdadams@smart.net>:
> Does New Jersey law allow for recall elections?
>
> I am asking this question because the shutting down of New Jersey's
> Horse Racing industry and its Casino industry make no sen
|
|
|
[Dick Adams asked whether New Jersey law allows for recall elections.]
Yep. Required by Article I, Section 2(b) of the New Jersey
constitution. Petition of 25% of the registered voters suffices.
Recall is permissible for any cause or no cause.
R
|
