|
|
Paul Cassel a écrit :
> nameless wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've a question regarding the legal use of an initial for a name. Can
> > someone with a name change (by court order) to something like
> > "J. Anthony Jones" legally use "John" or another n
|
|
|
A Michigan Attorney wrote:
> ummNstuff14@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > A buddy of mine lost his license due to a mandatory license sanctioning
> > in the state of Michigan for a usage of marijuana charge. Does anyone
> > know, or know where to find out,
|
|
|
Tony wrote:
> (Riverside, CA)
>
> Last night, my 1998 Camaro was picked up by the dealer for non-payment.
> This is an in-house finance deal: the dealer financed the purchase. The
> problem is that the payments were current. I have proof of the last
|
|
|
marcia wrote:
> Mike wrote:
> > In mid of 2002, I became unemployed again, and of course, I called XYZ
> > Visa to activate the insurance. Few months later, I noticed that my XYZ
> > Visa card balance hasn't changed! When I called XYZ Visa to find out
|
|
|
Does anyone how to find someone that specializes in wrongful termination in
NC? NC is a right to work state but I was harassed and targeted. I'm just
having problems locating an attorney. Any suggestions?
|
|
|
John A. Weeks III wrote:
> One employee was caught selling illegal
> drugs during work hours. The employee was fired. The employee
> filed for unemployment. My brother instructed the company to
> contest the claim. The state argued that selling
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi wrote:
> In article <59m2b2ppq8q67vuq18j4hsvjh97qcj0mgm@4ax.com>,
> JSmith <jsmith246@mailinator.com> wrote:
> >
> >apirion@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Have no knowledge of unemployment system. Don't understand how it
(> >> would hurt an
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
>> What happens to *your* insurance rates if you file a dozen claims in a
>> year? :)
>
> What *should* happen? Nothing.
>
> The whole idea of insurance is to charge everybody an amount equal to
> the average expected loss, pl
|
|
|
"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.hnoir@burditt.org> wrote in message
news:bo27b2h880reps7bhs36uahsd52euc69dl@4ax.com...
> >I tried to get scotthedrick.com. For several months, the site did not
> >exist,
>>because the owner was simply holding the name, an
|
|
|
In article <do27b2tb9kbsmlre7343emkrl5eqt2lt72@4ax.com>,
Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
>If I had chosen to register reitman.com and then sell it to Reitman's,
>I probably would be liable under the Cybersquatting Act.
If you reg
|
|
|
Anyone know what the damages are if a financial institution gives your
name and telephone number to another "CUSTOMER" because they believe
you were witness to someone hitting their car?
This is clearly a violation of privacy. The teller looked up m
|
|
|
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
> kress1963nov22@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can it be
>> used like on labeling bluejeans "certified organic bluejeans"?
>> Thanks!
>>
> C
|
|
|
In article <4o27b2tejej96llfub85khd3ndqhe7egr1@4ax.com>,
Tony <tony23IDONTLIKESPAM@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>A trademark applies to the logo or name ONE company uses in the conduct
>of its business, and is unique to that company.
Counterexample: "
|
|
|
In article <3o27b21q4a0ru0aotr0vq35vudbnq2t2pk@4ax.com>,
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>kress1963nov22@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can it be
>> used like on labeling bluejea
|
|
|
Paul Cassel wrote:
> kress1963nov22@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can it be
>>used like on labeling bluejeans "certified organic bluejeans"?
>>Thanks!
>
> Certifiably Organic is a registered tr
|
|
|
Tony <tony23IDONTLIKESPAM@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> kress1963nov22@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Is the term "certified organic" a protected legal trademark? Can
>> it be used like on labeling bluejeans "certified organic
>> bluejeans"? Thanks!
>
> A tradem
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:1o27b2d4md7jsiufvjt80fanribkrf2pk7@4ax.com...
> That is, "fair market value" may not exist for some items.
That is exactly right, because if someone is not willing to exchange value
for va
|
|
|
<Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vn27b21413ovj5582h9fp5oi2f0u4adiuq@4ax.com...
> I will assume Scott waited a year before issuing his rejoinder in order
> to give post-Kelo tempers a year to cool off.
Wish I'd thought of that, but it
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Scott Hedrick <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote
>>>
>>>>"Fair market value" is defined as what a willing and able buyer
>>>>will pay, NOT what the seller is ask
|
|
|
In article <vn27b21413ovj5582h9fp5oi2f0u4adiuq@4ax.com>,
<Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Under SCOTUS' jurisprudence on Just Compensation, the tension above is
>neatly resolved by ignoring idiosyncratic value. Actually, that's not
>entirely true. T
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> bat wrote:
>> If the cop turned out to be right, then anything that prompted him/her to
>> make the stop, automatically becames probable cause, with the probability
>> being 100%.
> Sorry, that's not the
|
|
|
Hello Mike:
You wrote in conference misc.legal.moderated on Tue, 11 Jul 2006
07:29:21 -0400:
MJ> bat wrote:
MJ>> If the cop turned out to be right, then anything that prompted him/her
MJ>> to make the stop, automatically becomes probable cause
|
|
|
In article <n8m2b2t3q981chv38k1amqt9doss083gl7@4ax.com>,
bat <bat@bats.com> wrote:
>If the cop turned out to be right, then anything that prompted him/her to
>make the stop, automatically becames probable cause, with the probability
>being 100%.
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> bat wrote:
> > If the cop turned out to be right, then anything that prompted him/her to
> > make the stop, automatically becames probable cause, with the probability
> > being 100%.
>
> Sorry, that's not the standard. You s
|
|
|
bat <bat@bats.com> wrote:
> p> The stop isn't legal JUST because the cop's "hunch" turned out to be
> p> right. If the cop didn't have legal cause (i.e. "probable cause") to
> p> make the stop, nothing that resulted from it is legal.
> If the cop
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> Ok, that sounds good. But just out of curiosity, what would keep a lawyer
> from sending an anonymous note or phone call to the DA and saying "hey,
> check out the news article in the Daily Planet on 04/03/02 about L
|
|
|
Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:31:37 -0400, prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>>Ok, that sounds good. But just out of curiosity, what would keep a lawyer
>>from sending an anonymous note or phone call to the
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> "a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client...if:
>> (2) the client has used the lawyer's services to perpetrate
>> a crime or fraud;
>> (3) the client insists upon
|
|
|
sdnospam@mailinator.com wrote:
> I'm a Texas resident who owns a minority of the stock in a
> privately-held Delaware C corp. No stock certificate has been issued.
>
> Is it possible to abandon ownership of all of this stock? I wouldn't be
> compensa
|
|
|
[sdnospam wants to abandon, without compensation, his minority
ownership in a Delaware C corp.]
Have you considered selling the shares back to the company for a
nominal amount? The corporation's board should have the power to
repurchase your shares
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> H9 wrote:
> > The dept secretary at my (non-healthcare-related) company insists on
> > opening sealed envelopes containing medical information of employees
> > intended for Healthcare/Insurance companies.
>
> Just who is it that
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> I really liked the last three paragraphs reading:
>
> "In the circumstances, this result cannot be unfair to Mr. Lodi. Although it
> is true that, as plaintiff and appellant, he loses, it is equally true that,
> as
|
|
|
Please post referrals. Thank you.
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I suspect that he lacks coverage for this type of incident. Every
> >homeowner's insurance policy I've seen contains a coverage exclusion
> >for damages arising out of
|
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:31:21 -0400, Jayne Kulikauskas
<jayne.kulikauskas@gmail.com> wrote:
>...the question has come
>up of legal liability of moderators for material that is posted on the
>newsgroup, for example, hate speech, copyright violation an
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> > > This part I don't understand. Why wouldn't YOUR homeowner's insurance
> > > company do anything for you? If the damages exceed your deductible,
> > > have your insurance company pay to repair the damages, and let them
> >
|
|
|
jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
> Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote:
>>The competition is now closed for the most fractured opinion. God
>>help any lower court which wants to make sense of it.
>
> I'd like to see mandatory page limits. Say, te
|
|
|
Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com wrote:
> [Air conditioning in apartment of Midwest City, Oklahoma OP (Snowfem)
> went out and OP is angry over timeliness of landlord's response. OP is
> leaving due to the incident and fear of a repeat, as OP asserts that
> slee
|
|
|
>[Air conditioning in apartment of Midwest City, Oklahoma OP (Snowfem)
>went out and OP is angry over timeliness of landlord's response. OP is
>leaving due to the incident and fear of a repeat, as OP asserts that
>sleep is more important to OP than it
|
|
|
Hello,
someone got hold of the billing information of my credit card (I'm in IL),
and placed an online order in a Sony Electronics store for a laptop computer
for $1,600+; the laptop had to be shipped to NH.
The store got suspicious on the separ
|
|
|
John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
> Scott Hedrick said the following:
>> Yes, because adverse possession requires the same party to remain
>> in open and notorious possession the whole time; while, if I had
>> a bad title to property, and I sold
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:31:07 -0400 from Jim Blackburn <wqgzasx02
> @sneakemail.com.invalid>:
>> Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve. Eve
>> doesn't like driving to the post o
|
|
|
Jim Blackburn <wqgzasx02@sneakemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Consider this situation:
>
> Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve.
> Eve doesn't like driving to the post office to pick up and sign for
> certified mail, so
|
|
|
>Jim Blackburn <wqgzasx02@sneakemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Consider this situation:
>>
>> Adam and Eve live in Virginia. Adam sends certified mail to Eve.
>> Eve doesn't like driving to the post office to pick up and sign
>> for certified mail
|
|
|
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Q4) Is there a potential anti-eminent domain poision pill here, where
> property owners could sign over leins to a trust or others, against
> their property for orders of magnitude more $'s than the propert
|
|
|
Network Admin wrote:
> Q1) If a city, state, other governmental organization takes a property
> for eminent domain purposes, what happens to any leins on the property,
> ie the mortgage, second, mechanics leins, etc?
The exercise of eminent domain a
|
|
|
In article <om27b2tckg8o7s1sl87aojibut1a71jc56@4ax.com>,
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Q1) If a city, state, other governmental organization takes a property
>for eminent domain purposes, what happens to any leins on the property,
>ie th
|
|
|
Some wild-onager responses to four questions that, as paraphrased, OP
(Network Admin) asked:
> Q1) [When property is taken by eminent domain, what happens to any liens?]
They are extinguished. The condemnation is of the whole schmear (the
"unburden
|
|
|
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Q1) If a city, state, other governmental organization takes a
> property for eminent domain purposes, what happens to any leins on
> the property, ie the mortgage, second, mechanics leins, etc?
They get pa
|
|
|
Ruth <ruburn@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> "Paul Cassel" <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> If you have uninsured
> motorist coverage on your car, file a claim with your insurance company
> Generally speaking, Uninsured Motorists coverage usually applie
|
