|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:53:40 -0400 from Mike Jacobs
> <mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
> > if the ex-employee were to sue his ex-employer for discrimination
> > or wrongful termination, ... the worker would be the
> > one with the burden of p
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
>> One other thing: the result that obtained at an unemployment
>> insurance eligibility hearing on these facts as you stated is
>> far from likely to occur if th
|
|
|
What is the meaning of the Canadian abbreviation "Me" preceding a
lawyer's name? I posted this question in soc.culture.canada but got no
response as they are all excited about international events.
David Ames
|
|
|
Dear Friends...
Kindly let me know the details of the following...
I took an internet connection from a ISP and was happy with their
service.
In the month of FEB I decided to stop their service and hence I called
up the support and asked them t
|
|
|
[Jim sold a motorcycle to David and properly executed the assignment
and warranty of title to David. Subsequently, David decided that he did
not want the motorcycle. Prior to applying for a transfer of title to
the motorcycle, David sold the bike to O
|
|
|
Crispy,
You purchased a motorcycle. The seller had not bothered to obtain title
to this vehicle. You have been patiently waiting for a month for him to
delver clear title. You ask for advice.
You need to send this guy a fairly friendly lette
|
|
|
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:42:48 -0400 from <not007@gmail.com>:
(Your car was hit in New Jersey parking lot. The other driver
admitted fault, and the insurance company agrees. They offered you
$1100 against two estimates of $1500 and $1400 you got.)
>
|
|
|
<not007@gmail.com> wrote:
>Receiving their lower number and not fixing the car doesn't make me
>whole when the repair costs $1500. How do I quantify the cost to make
>me whole when I don't get the car fixed?
You've made a good start by getting two
|
|
|
not007@gmail.com wrote:
> 2 questions:
>
> I'm starting to think the damage really isn't that bad...
Was that a question?
> 1) >>>> IN NJ<<<<<<, Can I legally just keep the money? The car is
> mine / paid off in full.
I don't know NJ law.
|
|
|
In article <115mb2d4t05sduqp08ohhd6n8l6l93s06e@4ax.com>,
<not007@gmail.com> wrote:
>Receiving their lower number and not fixing the car doesn't make me
>whole when the repair costs $1500. How do I quantify the cost to make
>me whole when I don't g
|
|
|
I'm looking for any tips you might have regarding collection on small
claims judgements. I know this question has been asked/answered before
.... but like many other questions surrounding small business debt
collection I'm not sure the answers I've rea
|
|
|
[posted and mailed]
"Daniel R. Reitman" <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
> I have one of those "It's obvious by I can't find the authority"
> arguments. Basically. the idea is that fiduciary duty prohibits a
> trustee from creating or failing to p
|
|
|
bat wrote:
> Hello Seth:
> You wrote in conference misc.legal.moderated on Thu, 13 Jul 2006
> 08:53:27 -0400:
>
> SB> In article <n8m2b2t3q981chv38k1amqt9doss083gl7@4ax.com>,
> SB> bat <bat@bats.com> wrote:
>
> SB>> If the cop turned out to
|
|
|
In article <k05mb2pt9a6uks7ffv2a44c64qgh6ccgu7@4ax.com>,
<blackrotspon@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Employees at a hospital I work at will be given a choice of continuing
>with our current retirement program (defined benefit plan) or moving
>to the new plan (
|
|
|
blackrotspon@yahoo.com wrote:
> Employees at a hospital I work at will be given a choice of continuing
> with our current retirement program (defined benefit plan) or moving
> to the new plan (defined contribution plan).
>
> We have been sent a fo
|
|
|
<blackrotspon@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:k05mb2pt9a6uks7ffv2a44c64qgh6ccgu7@4ax.com...
> Employees at a hospital I work at will be given a choice of continuing
> with our current retirement program (defined benefit plan) or moving
> to the new
|
|
|
In article <k05mb2pt9a6uks7ffv2a44c64qgh6ccgu7@4ax.com>,
<blackrotspon@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"xxx reserves the right to change or terminate benefits at any time and
>for any reason."
>
>To me, this means that if my employer decides in the future to s
|
|
|
> > or that he's saying "I didn't do it" (which would be lying to the court.)
>
> He's not saying that.
Though I believe courts have ruled that if a defendant takes the stand and says
"I didn't do it" and is subsequently convicted, he can be tried
|
|
|
"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> writes:
> I think I see where the confusion may lie. "Guilt" in our society
> means two related but distinct things: Type (1) "guilt" is the bad
> feeling one gets inside when one does something one knows is bad,
|
|
|
>prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Now if a "not guilty" can be taken as being either one
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>It can't.
I think this is the central part of the matter, and prabbit's problem
may rise from misunderstanding t
|
|
|
In article <i05mb2lhvou38g940nqph7lrr48oi30icp@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>I think I see where the confusion may lie. "Guilt" in our society
>means two related but distinct things: Type (1) "guilt" is the bad
>feeling one g
|
|
|
Jonathan Sachs <xxxxxxx@sbcglobal.not> wrote:
> esqmsm@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>...why not transfer it to one of the other shareholders for a
>>minimal amount of contribution? Why do you want to "abandon" it? A
>>corporation is legally a "person," at
|
|
|
In article <g05mb2d3ruj4ojqts6euqtsoua7ej0p8ac@4ax.com>,
Jonathan Sachs <xxxxxxx@sbcglobal.not> wrote:
>The corporation was a small corporation with closely held stock, and
>it was impossible to transfer the shares without a vote of approval by
>th
|
|
|
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:42:11 -0400 from Mike Jacobs
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
(Advice to seek legal counsel and a class action suit if direct talks
with the employer and health-insurance company fail.)
> you may wind up getting well compensated for your
|
|
|
[JavaTek is looking for a free copy of "Columbia/HCA Corporation and
the Medicare Fraud Scandal" by Lawrence, Anne T.]
Professor Lawrence's vita doesn't include a link, which it usually
would if the document were generally available at no cost. You m
|
|
|
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:41:57 -0400, Jayne Kulikauskas
<jayne.kulikauskas@gmail.com> wrote:
>...I am still unclear about how laws apply in an
>international forum. If, for example, a Canadian moderator allowed a
>post by a US poster that was legal i
|
|
|
Is personal IRS debt discharged in a bankruptcy (chapter 7) filing? How
about for a corporation or LLC? Will the IRS pursue the individual
shareholders or partners for past due taxes?
|
|
|
In article <105mb25tmri94h8om7ilan43ne40ufkn5p@4ax.com>,
john@johnweeks.com says...
> In article <h8gcb2t27n4d9vlprjc3n9nj4o530mhu1n@4ax.com>,
> "bat" <bat@bats.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm curious, is it indeed so as he claims, and placing an internet o
|
|
|
M Berger wrote:
> > But the thief has to be prosecuted, so I filed a police report with the
> > local PD. The Sony store even gave the IP address the order was placed from;
> > it belongs in Comcast in Michigan.
> >
> > Today, an officer called as
|
|
|
bat wrote:
>
> But the thief has to be prosecuted, so I filed a police report with the
> local PD. The Sony store even gave the IP address the order was placed from;
> it belongs in Comcast in Michigan.
>
> Today, an officer called as a follow-u
|
|
|
M> If the Sony store and credit card company have declined to
M> follow up, why do you feel compelled?
Because it's my taxes that pay for the law enforcement that I expect to
prevent crimes. The next effort may succeed, and I will spend lots of time
|
|
|
A case that tested the above maxim was recently litigated in the Court
of Appeal of the Pitcairn Islands.
The Pitcairn Island is an Overseas Territory of the UK, situated in the
Pacific Ocean halfway between New Zealand and South America. It has a
po
|
|
|
Dan wrote:
> We are selling our house in NY State and the contracts have been
> approved. Our agent works for us but also the buyer as a dual agent.
> She miss informed the buyer of the correct taxes verbally and told them
> the taxes were $8700 on
|
|
|
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:41:36 -0400, "Dan" <hdezak@msn.com> wrote:
>We are selling our house in NY State and the contracts have been
>approved. Our agent works for us but also the buyer as a dual agent.
>She miss informed the buyer of the correct tax
|
|
|
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:41:36 -0400 from Dan <hdezak@msn.com>:
> We are selling our house in NY State and the contracts have been
> approved. Our agent works for us but also the buyer as a dual agent.
> She miss informed the buyer of the correct taxes ver
|
|
|
> We are selling our house in NY State and the contracts have been
> approved. Our agent works for us but also the buyer as a dual agent.
> She miss informed the buyer of the correct taxes verbally and told them
> the taxes were $8700 on an assessed v
|
|
|
"Dan" <hdezak@msn.com> wrote:
> We are selling our house in NY State and the contracts have been
> approved. Our agent works for us but also the buyer as a dual
> agent. She miss informed the buyer of the correct taxes verbally
> and told them the
|
|
|
In article <ov4mb2t7cprkdbc66o87idogdk2f0omimb@4ax.com>,
"Dan" <hdezak@msn.com> wrote:
> We are selling our house in NY State and the contracts have been
> approved. Our agent works for us but also the buyer as a dual agent.
> She miss informed th
|
|
|
[Asserting the incontrovertible point that there is no "willing seller"
in a taking by way of eminent domain, Seth Breidbart wondered:]
> What if the [condemned] item is unique?
>
> What's the Fair Market Value of the Mona Lisa? Suppose the
> highes
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>26 C.F.R. §1.148-5(d)(6), says, among other things,
>>
>>"Definition of fair market value — (i) In general. The fair market
>>value of an investment is t
|
|
|
[Doug tells us about his plans to improve a parcel in Colorado,
currently thwarted by somebody from the adjoining parcel having put a
driveway across Doug's unimproved parcel thirty (30) years ago and
using it continuously since then.]
Sounds like t
|
|
|
Doug <anothername@access4less.net> wrote:
>State is Colorado. Building lot is 100' x 40'. It meets the county regs
>to be buildable. A small house can be put on it. The setbacks are 5'
>each side, so a 30' wide house could be built on it. More like 26
|
|
|
Doug,
You own a small parcel of land in Colorado. This lot has not been built
upon. A neighbor has a driveway cutting through this property. This driveway
has existed for 30 yrs. You ask for advice.
If your neighbor has been using this prope
|
|
|
In article <hv4mb25s2u08k3gaod2qv4ihloajlbqvcp@4ax.com>,
Doug <anothername@access4less.net> wrote:
>Problem is, the neighbor in the back has his driveway going in right
>down the middle of this lot. It has been that way for more than 30
>years. He
|
|
|
bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
> In Calif. attorneys are not allowed except when the defendant is
> a) a lawyer, or
> b) a corporation, all of whose officers are lawyers (in which
> case one of the officers will appear).
Lawyers ar
|
|
|
<nospam@isp.com> wrote in message
news:9v4mb25ve08tbllb29qf1bu3ioagte04ho@4ax.com...
> On 13 Jul 2006, "Gary Goodman" <garyXg7X@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > * * * What Corzine did is a variation on cutting
> > off one's nose to spite the face beca
|
|
|
In article <r4gcb2hjalb0kjt2j8bvh5cjd0c5v9buhn@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>Still, it makes no sense to me. You'd think they could work out some
>compromise for state employees whose services actually permit a major
>local in
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>
>>> If a book is "channelled" and claims the author is someone who
>>> died 300 years ago, does that put it out
|
|
|
snm wrote:
> A friend & I own a house, he has decided instead of selling he wants to
> buyout my equity, we are 50/50 owners. He is trying to say I should pay
> half a realtor fee as if we were selling outright. This is not an
> actual cost. Does this
|
|
|
[snm and friend ("Friend") own house 50/50. Friend wants to buy out snm
"instead of selling" but deduct half the foregone realtor's commission.
Snm wonders whether this is reasonable.]
Reasonable? Sure!
Sounds like snm and Friend were planning to
|
