|
|
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:58:14 -0400, venkatmangudi@gmail.com wrote:
> Recently I sold some items and the buyer paid by check. When I cashed
> the check, it was returned because he had issued a stop payment. It was
> almost a month since he had issued
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:08 -0400, "johnmolinda@yahoo.com"
<johnmolinda@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I have an interesting question I've been pondering. My cousin recently
>got charged with tresspassing. He just paid a fine of $300 and it got
>dismissed. The
|
|
|
johnmolinda@yahoo.com wrote:
> signs that say "no tresspassing - state property" around the perimeter.
>
> Anway...if the state is governed by the people, and I am a citizen of
> that state, am I therefore not part of the state gov't or state itself
|
|
|
In article <3clzjf91ennm.x6eq3zpv0aur.dlg@40tude.net>,
GeekBoy <nunya@nunya.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:08 -0400, johnmolinda@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> I have an interesting question I've been pondering. My cousin recently
>> got charged with
|
|
|
GeekBoy <heh@haha.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:08 -0400, johnmolinda@yahoo.com wrote:
>> I have an interesting question I've been pondering. My cousin recently
>> got charged with tresspassing. He just paid a fine of $300 and it got
>> di
|
|
|
In article <p1klc25jglpfiiseec6rsv7t672c1r7ld8@4ax.com>,
johnmolinda@yahoo.com <johnmolinda@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I have an interesting question I've been pondering. My cousin recently
>got charged with tresspassing. He just paid a fine of $300 and it got
|
|
|
John,
You ask about trespassing on government property. You argue that you are
a member of the State, that therefore this is your property, and thus this
is not trespassing,
The government is a legal entity. It has the right to own property
|
|
|
In article <3clzjf91ennm.x6eq3zpv0aur.dlg@40tude.net>,
GeekBoy <heh@haha.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:08 -0400, johnmolinda@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > I have an interesting question I've been pondering. My cousin recently
> > got charged w
|
|
|
Hi there,
New to the whole Google Group thing, not posted since back in the heady
ole days of Usenet!... Hope everyone is well, having a blast, and
looking forward to partaking more :-)
I'm looking for advice, experience, info etc. regarding a sit
|
|
|
johnmolinda@yahoo.com <johnmolinda@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have an interesting question I've been pondering. My cousin recently
> got charged with tresspassing. He just paid a fine of $300 and it got
> dismissed. The question is he was tresspassing on
|
|
|
drtebi@gmail.com wrote:
> I am (hopefully soon!) going to rent an apartment in San
> Francisco. Currently my girlfriend is visiting, and she would live
> with me as a guest in the new apartment for about 8 more weeks.
>
> Since she will not sign t
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:04 -0400, "Nietzsche" <sc00b123@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>I understand that federal courts can apply state law where they have
>diveristy jurisdiction. But can state courts apply federal law?
Absolutely, when federal law applies
|
|
|
Nietzsche wrote:
> I understand that federal courts can apply state law where they have
> diveristy jurisdiction. But can state courts apply federal law?
Yes, in some ways. Certain federal statutes providing a private cause
of action specifically
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, "Nietzsche" <sc00b123@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I understand that federal courts can . . .
. . . with respect to state law issues/claims not affected by federal
ones: must (i.e., not merely "can") . . .
> . . . apply state law
|
|
|
[Nietzsche asked whether state courts can apply federal law.]
By default, state courts have concurrent subject matter jurisdiction
over claims or charges based in federal law. Any given federal law may,
however, include a provision vesting exclusive
|
|
|
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:04 -0400 from Nietzsche <sc00b123@yahoo.com>:
> I understand that federal courts can apply state law where they have
> diveristy jurisdiction. But can state courts apply federal law?
Not "can", "must". Federal law supersedes St
|
|
|
"Nietzsche" <sc00b123@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I understand that federal courts can apply state law where they have
> diveristy jurisdiction. But can state courts apply federal law?
Sure. They do it all the time.
Stu
|
|
|
on 7/28/2006 8:07 PM Tim G said the following:
> I work for a large retail store in NJ.
<SNIP>
>
> My questions are:
>
> Is there any law or regulation (State or Federal) requiring a retail
> store to give any meal or break periods for workers
|
|
|
In article <e1klc2hso6tt1qdn4lgepssav7h35ppi5g@4ax.com>,
Tim G <timg2006@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I work for a large retail store in NJ. We do not have a union. The
>employees are being told by out Human Resources Manager the following:
>- The law req
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:03 -0400, Tim G <timg2006@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>I work for a large retail store in NJ. We do not have a union. The
>employees are being told by out Human Resources Manager the following:
>- The law requires anyone 18 or o
|
|
|
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:03 -0400 from Tim G <timg2006@hotmail.com>:
> I work for a large retail store in NJ. We do not have a union. The
> employees are being told by out Human Resources Manager the following:
> - The law requires anyone 18 or older
|
|
|
In article <k0tdc2l2n2rrmviit03if9j59iadki5ci2@4ax.com>,
<nongrata@yahoo.com> wrote:
>All:
>
>A small challenge for y'all. I got ticketed by a red-light camera in
>Berkeley and it's a $331 cheeseburger. (I was late by 0.2 seconds at
>10-15 mph, not
|
|
|
Note: follow-ups are set to misc.legal.moderated.
GB: They follow the process where the stills/video is reviewed by PD
before the ticket is issued, just like they do in LA per Barry's
description.
David: The town does have the signs posted at majo
|
|
|
In article <7g09lqp21m1u.lyx2ddvk7ji8.dlg@40tude.net>,
GeekBoy <nunya@nunya.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:07:01 -0400, A Troll wrote:
>
>>>
>>>For future reference there is a spray or plate cover that will over expose
>>>the image when it tak
|
|
|
In misc.legal.moderated GeekBoy <heh@ha.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:59 -0400, Barry Gold wrote:
>>>On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:50:10 -0400, nongrata@yahoo.com wrote:
>> [OP got a red-light camera ticket, $335. Wondered about
>> technicalitie
|
|
|
In article <11klc2h7gs658v3hjb0ass8sa0matl2qq9@4ax.com>,
Christopher C. Stacy <cstacy@news.dtpq.com> wrote:
>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
>> It hasn't been _proven_ to be a crime, and there might be no
>> _knowledge_ (by anybody, including
|
|
|
nongrata@yahoo.com wrote:
> All:
>
> A small challenge for y'all. I got ticketed by a red-light camera in
> Berkeley and it's a $331 cheeseburger. (I was late by 0.2 seconds at
> 10-15 mph, not quite a reckless violation these systems are supposed
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:55 -0400, pegboy37@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi Folks, I have a quick question that I can't quite figure out. A
>friend of mine had a girlfriend living with him for about 2.5 years,
>in which she accumulated MUCH junk in his home. H
|
|
|
pegboy37@gmail.com wrote:
> friend of mine had a girlfriend living with him for about 2.5 years,
> in which she accumulated MUCH junk in his home. He owns the home, and
> everything is in his name, utilities included.
Irrelevant. Whats hers is her
|
|
|
pegboy37@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Folks, I have a quick question that I can't quite figure out. A
> friend of mine had a girlfriend living with him for about 2.5 years,
> in which she accumulated MUCH junk in his home. He owns the home, and
> everything
|
|
|
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:55 -0400 from <pegboy37@gmail.com>:
> Hi Folks, I have a quick question that I can't quite figure out. A
> friend of mine had a girlfriend living with him for about 2.5 years,
> in which she accumulated MUCH junk in his home. He
|
|
|
>> There IS justification for them doing what they've done - the rate of in
>> house wounds increased upon you assuming patient duties.
>
>I think everyone is missing a key point here... A TREATMENT nurse
>TREATS wounds. It is everyone's job to preve
|
|
|
In article <t0klc2l5oehpv991aq5b144evgu0altrdg@4ax.com>,
<radlee@progressivetel.com> wrote:
>I think everyone is missing a key point here... A TREATMENT nurse
>TREATS wounds. It is everyone's job to prevent these wounds. This
>equates to dismissi
|
|
|
Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> The idea of "ignorance is no
>> excuse" basically seems to deal with common law and "it doesn't matter if
>> you didn't know that 'don't do X' was codified but you should have
|
|
|
In article <l0klc2pacoad697jjvurm1olshes4u285g@4ax.com>,
Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote:
>That's fine if it is murder, but for statutory rape, it is a different
>case, IMHO. As I have mentioned, the age of consent is not very
>consistent, so it is
|
|
|
on 7/28/2006 8:06 PM barry@psyber.com said the following:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wanting to look up and obtain a copy of a criminal legal case in
> my county (Placer County, Calif) and obtain the judge's ruling on that
> case.
You should just be able to g
|
|
|
<barry@psyber.com> wrote:
> I'm wanting to look up and obtain a copy of a criminal legal case
> in my county (Placer County, Calif) and obtain the judge's ruling
> on that case.
>
> How would I go about searching for the case. It is my
> underst
|
|
|
mark wrote:
> am getting too close to the SOL expiration and so far all the lawyers
> that I've called are not interested in representing me.
Um, actually that should tell you something about the lack of potential
success they see in your case. Yo
|
|
|
"A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> tomusenet@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I had a domestic violence case against me where I lived in
>> California County A, all alleged incidents occurred in County A.
>> Petitioner filed the case in Coun
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <vsbqb25h3lorht6lnrab7g493c229bdh53@4ax.com>,
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>>> See? "willing seller" is part of the definition.
|
|
|
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:45 -0400 from <phlman@hotmail.com>:
> my divorce became final in Jan 2005,
>
> i have retained the home as per the contract
> she got cash settle and 2 larger items
>
> which are still here.. in my home.
> is there any sta
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:45 -0400, phlman@hotmail.com wrote:
>my divorce became final in Jan 2005,
>i have retained the home as per the contract
>she got cash settle and 2 larger items
>which are still here.. in my home.
>is there any statue o
|
|
|
In article <isbqb2drfq1hfh96lql4q2cibq5ueghsur@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>>
|
|
|
In article <80klc2hhhcnif8f1fd7but86v1925d0nka@4ax.com>,
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>In article <c7k9c2lifdq9frholtpouq2sf19g090suo@4ax.com>,
>Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Seth Breidbart wrote:
>>
>>> If they sold it (say
|
|
|
Recently I sold some items and the buyer paid by check. When I cashed
the check, it was returned because he had issued a stop payment. It was
almost a month since he had issued the check before I received the
check back with Stop Payment printed on it.
|
|
|
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:42 -0400 from Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
> >If you've got a reasonable legal claim for ownership aside from,
> >"possession is nine tenths of the law," you might just have so
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi wrote:
>> Example: I have $20 in the bank and I try to do an ATM withdrawal or a debit
>> or visa-check-card credit purchase for $50. Some banks will simply deny that
>> charge (as they should, IMO.)
>
> yup. That's when an on-line bal
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:39 -0400, prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>> rentgenas11@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> am I law student (PhD) from Latvia. The object of my doctoral
>>> studies and practice is civ
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>> rentgenas11@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>> am I law student (PhD) from Latvia. The object of my doctoral
>>> studies and practice is civil law, especially contract law a
|
|
