|
|
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:15:47 -0400, Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
> GeekBoy <nerdynerd@nynua.com> wrote:
>> Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>
>>> Up to your last point was good advice. On the last point,
>>> however, threatening (or even implying) that y
|
|
|
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:15:47 -0400, Barry Gold wrote:
> GeekBoy <nunya@nunya.com> wrote:
>>How is that? You see signs posted in many stores with "WE PROCECUTE BAD
>>CHECK WRITERS"
>
> Believe it or not, that is valid. The distinction is between
|
|
|
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:15:44 -0400, Dwayne Hoover wrote:
> I'm moving out of my apartment at the end of August. I have been
> renting month to month (or so I thought) for the past year and a half.
> I called the real estate managment company the ot
|
|
|
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:16:20 -0400, Stangntpls@aol.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
Since your neighbor hired them and had them on her property at her request,
she is ultimately responsible for the damage.
> My neighbor had a large tree removed from he
|
|
|
Hi,
My neighbor had a large tree removed from her property. The tree was
healthy, but very large, and made her "nervous" because it had large
branches that over hung both our homes. The tree was on the down slope
of a hill in her yard and near the b
|
|
|
Hello. I am NEW to this GOOGLE GROUPS thing... It seems like a good
resource>>>
Here is my question:
I recently got a BRAND new Motorcycle & took it out to go to work one
day>(I couldn't HELP IT!!!)
I got pulled over because the Bike is BRAND new
|
|
|
Two detectives came to the office of a CPA to inquire about
one of the CPA's clients. The story I heard is that after a
brief exchange, the CPA said he wanted his attorney present
and they said they were going to arrest him for obstruction
of justic
|
|
|
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:06:00 -0400, "papadlh" <papadlh@isp.com> wrote:
>The "named" trustees for my fathers generation skipping trust has
>transfered approx. 60 acres of farmland to himself, immediately after
>my fathers death, (30 days) worth about
|
|
|
papadlh <papadlh@isp.com> wrote:
>The "named" trustees for my fathers generation skipping trust has
>transfered approx. 60 acres of farmland to himself, immediately after
>my fathers death, (30 days) worth about $150,000. They claim my father
>wanted
|
|
|
On 1 Aug 2006, "papadlh" <papadlh@isp.com> wrote:
> [My father's generation skipping trust which directs
> that I am to have the income (profit) from trust assets
> requires 3 trustees but only one is acting and he has
> not appointed another for 1
|
|
|
"papadlh" <papadlh@isp.com> wrote:
> The "named" trustees for my fathers generation skipping trust has
> transfered approx. 60 acres of farmland to himself, immediately
> after my fathers death, (30 days) worth about $150,000. They claim
> my father
|
|
|
TimDavis wrote:
> Texas Bankruptcy Question:
>
> If you and your wife own a free and clear rural Texas homestead
> of 25 acres and a house (that a Designation of Homestead has
> been filed), and the county tax records show the 25 acres and
> house
|
|
|
"TimDavis" <timdavis3030@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If you and your wife own a free and clear rural Texas homestead
> of 25 acres and a house (that a Designation of Homestead has
> been filed), and the county tax records show the 25 acres and
> house as yo
|
|
|
"Scott Hedrick" <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> writes:
> <drtebi@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:j1klc2pgb5vt7qep036tt5p398142iln3m@4ax.com...
>> Hello,
>> I am (hopefully soon!) going to rent an apartment in San Francisco.
>> Currently my girlf
|
|
|
On the side of my house I have installed Dusk till Dawn motion sensor
security lights. I installed approximately 2 months ago.
Now my neigbor has complained that the light hits his window and unable
to sleep at night when the sensor is tripped.
I ha
|
|
|
In article <vuqvc2t31ps65pb5tsioulrfjnfag4knud@4ax.com>,
Scott Hedrick <diespammers-dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
>news:f1klc2h8dr41fq5849im4870tjv33rri2t@4ax.com...
>> Suppose she agrees to move for $
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <c5bpc2tl9ojjbbf2vp59r5h1aajnh33vc7@4ax.com>,
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>> In misc.legal.moderated GeekBoy <heh@ha.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:59 -0400, Barry Gold wrote:
>
>>> From what I
|
|
|
bat wrote:
> p> you're completely away from your original statement of "if it worked,
> p> it's 100% ok" (or words to that effect) and now agreeing that ONLY that
> p> that has been shown to have a good track record in the past and can be
> p> cle
|
|
|
My wife is trustee of deceased father's trust. House and land were
"quit claimed" into the trust. Trust does not list beneficiary for the
property but his intent clearly was that she would inherit. She is the
only living child. In a post last year,
|
|
|
"bat" <bat@bats.com> writes:
> If she was observing the man, and made the conclusion that he was
> under influence, and her conclusion turned out to be correct, then I
> don't think anyone could reasonably deny that her cause was probable.
Fortunate
|
|
|
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:05:30 -0400, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
[Hypothetical: Joe stabs victim, who coincidentally dies of natural
causes before the blow.]
>So it turns out that Joe _isn't_ really guilty of murder. Attempted
>murder, perh
|
|
|
Some years ago at a company meeting I was told that in Maryland
it is not legal for a prescription drug benefit plan to require that
prescriptions be filled or refilled by mail.
Where would I look to verify or disprove that?
--
FF
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
> If there isn't enough evidence to show that X pulled the trigger, but
> in reality X did pull the trigger, then there is the crime, and X is
> guilty, even though X was not _convicted_.
The problem in this
|
|
|
Its difficult for me to get to lawyers' offices and I have some
specific questions about family law (particularly divorce) and related
family business and property issues.
It would be most helpful if I could find online advice both because of
my dif
|
|
|
On 1 Aug 2006, "Elmer" <purplecowwe@yahoo.com> said and speculated in
substance:
> [ An on-line search by an amateur detective of residential
> property ownership/transfers indicates that in 2005 an
> LLC became the record owner of the real propert
|
|
|
A U.S. citizen by parentage, born abroad, is missing his passport, last
seen at his parents' home here. In order to get a new passport, he now
needs to prove citizenship. Shouldn't his birth have been registered
with the State Department, and shouldn
|
|
|
"Elmer" <purplecowwe@yahoo.com> writes:
> I'm a legal layperson trying to help a family member do some amateur
> detective work online regarding an ex's business activities. The ex no
> longer lives in our state (relocated to Ohio).
>
> This perso
|
|
|
John F. Carr wrote:
> In article <l0klc2pacoad697jjvurm1olshes4u285g@4ax.com>,
> Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote:
>> That's fine if it is murder, but for statutory rape, it is a different
>> case, IMHO. As I have mentioned, the age of consent is no
|
|
|
David Chesler wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Manoj <manojb@mailcity.com> wrote:
>>> That's fine if it is murder, but for statutory rape, it is a different
>>> case, IMHO. As I have mentioned, the age of consent is not very
>>> consisten
|
|
|
GeekBoy wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:06:47 -0400, Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>
> > GeekBoy <nunya@nun.net> wrote:
> >> tomusenet@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> I had a domestic violence case against me where I lived in
> >>> California County A,
|
|
|
GeekBoy <nerdynerd@nerds.com> wrote:
> Not really. A person has a right to be sued in the local were they
> are at.
Not always. But even in a case where venue is only proper in the
county where he lives, ignoring a judgment from another county
|
|
|
Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:04:53 -0400 from antinora
<jantinor@optonline.net>:
> 1. A patient told me that as long as I have not made a payment that,
> should I default, I would have a repo on my credit but not be
> accountable for the equipment. That the
|
|
|
antinora <jantinor@optonline.net> wrote:
>I've lease a piece of medical equipment, with personal guarantee on 90
>deferred 1st payment, which is not working out like I expected.
>
>1. A patient told me that as long as I have not made a payment that,
|
|
|
In article <1uqvc2h4fhphkmnkhvfh0t1nl93ron5ir6@4ax.com>,
<bob.mcguire@gmail.com> wrote:
>I recently sold a domain name that I no longer use to another party. A
>few weeks after the domain was transferred to the new owner, I received
>notice that it
|
|
|
In article <1uqvc2h4fhphkmnkhvfh0t1nl93ron5ir6@4ax.com>,
<bob.mcguire@gmail.com> wrote:
>I recently sold a domain name that I no longer use to another party. A
>few weeks after the domain was transferred to the new owner, I received
>notice that it
|
|
|
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:04:50 -0400, bob.mcguire@gmail.com wrote:
>I recently sold a domain name... paid for with a PayPal account not
>belonging to the person that purchased it. After an investigation by
>PayPal the money was removed from my account
|
|
|
This is the definition that my friend and I agreed to use for our
argument:
***
pardon 1) v. to use the executive power of a Governor or President to
forgive a person convicted of a crime, thus removing any remaining
penalties or punishments, and pre
|
|
|
Immediately following a crime, the police can detain suspects
for questioning, and make arrests, with probable cause.
My question concerns other circumstances. What are
the powers and limitations on this 'detain' thing?
Suppose, for example, ther
|
|
|
If a parent's misconduct (against staff etc.) results in the withdrawal
of daycare services for their child, do they or their child have an
action against the daycare? That is, if it was stipulated in the
contract that unacceptable behaviour on the par
|
|
|
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:04:42 -0400, "Boothbay" <harri85274@aol.com>
wrote:
>After 18 years of owning my home, I recieved a letter today asking if I
>need to have a certified copy of my deed. The date they quoted was
>about a year after I purchased m
|
|
|
on 8/1/2006 5:04 PM Boothbay said the following:
> After 18 years of owning my home, I recieved a letter today asking if I
> need to have a certified copy of my deed.
State law and local practices vary, you didn't tell us where you live .
.. . Ok
|
|
|
Boothbay <harri85274@aol.com> wrote:
>After 18 years of owning my home, I recieved a letter today asking if I
>need to have a certified copy of my deed. The date they quoted was
>about a year after I purchased my home. I do have a 'Satisfaction of
>Mo
|
|
|
On 1 Aug 2006, "Boothbay" <harri85274@aol.com> wrote:
> After 18 years of owning my home, I recieved a
> letter . . . asking if I need to have a certified copy
> of my deed . . . . [and saying] it would do all the work
> to get the deed for $89.50.
|
|
|
"Boothbay" <harri85274@aol.com> wrote:
> After 18 years of owning my home, I recieved a letter today asking
> if I need to have a certified copy of my deed. The date they
> quoted was about a year after I purchased my home. I do have a
> 'Satisfacti
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <c4bpc29l2mfnlnjkn6svphirsos1ri64rh@4ax.com>,
> Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
> Co-owner says no, it goes to court for partition, each gets $47K.
>
> >$50k is the _fair_ price, for a no-broker
|
|
|
In article <stqvc2t7ipqahup0k76eg9oe3smuteti30@4ax.com>,
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>In article <c4bpc29l2mfnlnjkn6svphirsos1ri64rh@4ax.com>,
>Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>>In article <80klc2hhhcnif8f1fd7but86v1925d
|
|
|
bfryh over@email.com wrote:
> "The pool and all structures housing appurtenances thereto shall be not
> less than five (5) feet from the nearest property line except, however,
> that such pool or structure shall not be located between the front
> p
|
|
|
b,
You wish to build a pool and are attempting through the builder to get
the necessary construction permit. Your initial permit request was denied
because parts of the pool, plumbing, pump, filter, do not meet the setbacks
required by code. Y
|
|
|
Have churches in America been exempt from paying property taxes since
the country was founded or did that become the law in a certain year
after its founding?
Thanks to anyone who assists.
|
|
|
on 8/1/2006 5:04 PM Stuart A. Bronstein said the following:
> GeekBoy <merrychristmas@santa.net> wrote:
>
>> Contact the District Attorney Office where he lives. What he has
>> done could be considered "theft by check."
>>
>> However you may still
|
