|
|
In article <kgd5g2p38svco8lj1o3h71iunve4lt98jo@4ax.com>,
Allan Adler <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>If you see a poster in the Post Office saying that a certain person
>is wanted dead or alive, does that mean that anyone who encounters
>that p
|
|
|
Allan Adler wrote:
> If you see a poster in the Post Office saying that a certain person
> is wanted dead or alive, does that mean that anyone who encounters
> that person has the legal right to kill him, no questions asked?
Is that what the posters
|
|
|
"Allan Adler" <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote in message
news:kgd5g2p38svco8lj1o3h71iunve4lt98jo@4ax.com...
>
> If you see a poster in the Post Office saying that a certain person
> is wanted dead or alive, does that mean that anyone who encounters
|
|
|
In article <kgd5g2p38svco8lj1o3h71iunve4lt98jo@4ax.com>,
Allan Adler <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> If you see a poster in the Post Office saying that a certain person
> is wanted dead or alive, does that mean that anyone who encounters
> that
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <bcu2g2lg0li9bmfm92ijll34aft85uqe45@4ax.com>,
> Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Here, a "slope easement" probably means that the county highway
> >engineer determined it is necessary, for safety and stru
|
|
|
myky123 wrote:
> Hi! I'm hoping someone here can help me make sense of these
> forms I just received.
I'm not an OH or KY lawyer and these comments are based on general
principles that may not apply in your particular case.
> My father passed awa
|
|
|
<duh@practical.org> wrote in message
news:lon5g258gs3h434e1d73tasq5b4fljdiid@4ax.com...
> "amyky123" <amyky123NOSPAM@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
>>I received . . . . a "Waiver of notice of probate of will" [and]
>> . . . a "Waiver of notice of applicatio
|
|
|
"amyky123" <amyky123NOSPAM@insightbb.com> wrote:
> My father passed away in April of this year. He had a will,
>which basically left everything to his wife (my stepmother)
>except for a piece of jewelry that is listed as no market value,
>but it
|
|
|
I bought 4 homes for investment in Cleveland, Ohio. Ameriquest was the
lender. I was told these were "turn key" units with all work done.
It's also listed that way on the web site and in email from the seller
(a rehabber supposedly)
Well not only wa
|
|
|
In article <9gd5g25m1su5g31l6c061to4rb7u31lhbv@4ax.com>,
Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>AYBABTU wrote:
>> Isn't an agent of the government suppose to read you your "rights" before
>> asking you incriminating questions on federal lan
|
|
|
Mike Anderson wrote:
> Paul Cassel wrote:
>> AYBABTU wrote:
>>> Isn't an agent of the government suppose to read you your "rights" before
>>> asking you incriminating questions on federal land?
>>>
>> Nope. This is a myth spread by those folks over
|
|
|
Mike Anderson wrote:
> AYBABTU wrote:
> > Isn't an agent of the government suppose to read you your "rights" before
> > asking you incriminating questions on federal land?
>
> Not unless you've been placed under arrest. Now can they use any answers
|
|
|
In article <9gd5g25m1su5g31l6c061to4rb7u31lhbv@4ax.com>,
Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
> AYBABTU wrote:
> > Isn't an agent of the government suppose to read you your "rights" before
> > asking you incriminating questions on federa
|
|
|
Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
> Paul Cassel wrote:
>>>
>> Nope. This is a myth spread by those folks over in TV-land. You
>> have the right not to self incriminate, but you must assert that
>> right.
>
> Bzzzt, wrong answer. The
|
|
|
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>> AYBABTU <georgek@humboldt1.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Isn't an agent of the government suppose to read you your
>> > "rights" before asking you incriminating questions on federal
>> > land?
>
> Technicality alert, but there's
|
|
|
Hi,
Our family signed a 12 month lease which expired August 2006. I got an
offer in June 2006 to renew and had to do so before August 11, 2006 and
so I renewed on June 30, 2006.
Six weeks or so later when I complained about our water bill and the
|
|
|
rick++ wrote:
> > If you want the maker of a bad check to redeem it, you ought to leave
> > the account number intact in order to assert that it is in fact his
> > check.
>
> Last four digits will do this as well.
> And protect you from a suit if
|
|
|
Sat, 09 Sep 2006 08:43:23 -0400 from Stuart A. Bronstein
<spamtrap@lexregia.com>:
> Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps some violation of the fair debt collection act that
> > basically says you can't divulge to a 3rd-part
|
|
|
John A. Weeks III wrote:
> if you and your boss agree
> that you are to be paid in cash. Both of you agree, and both of
> you benefit, but it is still illegal to do so.
Citation? I never heard that. Cash is legal tender for all debts.
Maybe
|
|
|
Sat, 09 Sep 2006 08:43:16 -0400 from Seth Breidbart
<sethb@panix.com>:
> In article <dbu2g21n05d77t30dr80oerd8bjm5bb7gp@4ax.com>,
> John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com> wrote:
> >It is a violation of your constitutional right of free assembly.
>
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> Were there any injuries, to you or your mother, even relatively minor
> aches and pains?
Well, "relatively minor aches and pains" sounds about right. Plus,
there is much more to that which is hard to prove. You know, all of
su
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:
>
> But there is no citizen's arrest for "infractions" (like traffic
> violations). Only a peace officer can issue the citation, and in most
> states only if he witnesses it. Sometimes if the evidence is good
> enough, the repor
|
|
|
Stan wrote:
> >
> > I had an accident recently. The other driver ran the red light. The
> > police report states that it was the other driver's fault but he was
> > NOT cited.
> >
> > My statement on the report clearly says that "I had the green l
|
|
