|
|
In article <rl5dg2l31olcaftv1r0u7s5vt3n6mudk0u@4ax.com>,
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> John F. Carr wrote:
>
> >
> > Would it violate the constitution to declare a person an
> > outlaw after trial and conviction for a capi
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote, in part:
> Many things about law enforcement were different then. In many parts
> of the country, cops were few and far between, as were lawyers and
> judges; most gentlemen carried sidearms openly, and occasionally used
> them on
|
|
|
Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com wrote:
> Allan Adler wrote:
>> If you see a poster in the Post Office saying that a
>> certain person is wanted dead or alive, does that mean
>> that anyone who encounters that person has the legal
>> right to kill him, no quest
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> unknown8866 <unknown8866@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Similarly: if your website declares "fair treatment", aka, publish
>>without censor, to all user postings, and then you delete a uses'
>>posting, aka, "preven
|
|
|
Texas law question, but answers based on other state
law would be helpful.
Background: I know that certain documents are issued
with warnings that they are not to be photocopied;
e.g., Naturalization Certificates (though the local
Social Security o
|
|
|
In article <il5dg2l9ue5jjiht5jun7crcrdoiq373uh@4ax.com>,
"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
> Actually most police officers do know about the nuances - many
> departments bring in specialists to train them. They learn to elicit
|
|
|
In article <j718g2184gnhnlu5f6b1lqehh0jlbb2i0e@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>>> AYBABTU <georgek@humboldt1.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Isn't an agent of the government suppose to read you your
>>>
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <9gd5g25m1su5g31l6c061to4rb7u31lhbv@4ax.com>,
> Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>
>> AYBABTU wrote:
>>> Isn't an agent of the government suppose to read you your "rights" before
>>> asking you incriminatin
|
|
|
Paul Cassel wrote:
> Mike Anderson wrote:
>> Paul Cassel wrote:
>>> AYBABTU wrote:
>>>> Isn't an agent of the government suppose to read you your "rights" before
>>>> asking you incriminating questions on federal land?
Here the OP asked if a feder
|
|
|
I am considering suing a party in Orlando Florida, but have not yet
found a lawyer to take on the case. How difficult would it be to fight
such a case as a litigant in person? I am from the UK and there lots
of people go to court as litigants in person
|
|
|
"John F. Carr" <jfc@mit.edu> wrote in message
news:gl5dg2tirs8v68vo4c5mopdono7esb1n95@4ax.com...
> I have seen lease renewals, one page documents that say we agree
> to extend the previous lease for a year with the same conditions
> except rent is no
|
|
|
OP (Brandy, <decemberelement@gmail.com>) wrote, as paraphrased:
[Replying to Landlord's proferred renewal, I renewed a residential
lease prior to the August 2006 expiration of the prior lease and prior
to the stated August 11, 2006 deadline to renew.
|
|
|
Can anyone help me with this. I do not know if this is too strange of
a situation but I am a single parent of a child who has no biological
father listed on the birth certificate for my child. There is a child
support order in standing with the biolog
|
|
|
Several years ago a man confessed to a murder of which
he had been acquitted. As a result of the publicity,
British law was changed to allow him to be tried again.
This month Billy Dunlop became the first person to be
convicted under a new law allowi
|
|
|
In article <al5dg2dt3jjgn2lqkf864sn1bt3jto8gji@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
>>>Bzzt! Your First Amendment right peaceably (n
|
|
|
Hooliganz wrote:
> If a borrower puts my name on a vehicle title as collateral for a loan,
> am I liable for that vehicle and any damages a driver may cause? If
> so, how can I protect myself?
>
If you are on as a lienholder, you aren't on the hook
|
|
|
Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:16:09 -0400 from Hooliganz <brettharlow123
@gmail.com>:
> If a borrower puts my name on a vehicle title as collateral for a loan,
> am I liable for that vehicle and any damages a driver may cause? If
> so, how can I protect myself
|
|
|
Hooliganz wrote:
> If a borrower puts my name on a vehicle title as collateral for a loan,
> am I liable for that vehicle and any damages a driver may cause? If
> so, how can I protect myself?
I think you mean they had your name put on the loan as
|
|
|
Hooliganz,
> If a borrower puts my name on a vehicle title as collateral for a loan,
> am I liable for that vehicle and any damages a driver may cause? If
> so, how can I protect myself?
If you allow the owner of the car to list you as co-
|
|
|
Hooliganz <brettharlow123@gmail.com> wrote:
>If a borrower puts my name on a vehicle title as collateral for a loan,
>am I liable for that vehicle and any damages a driver may cause? If
>so, how can I protect myself?
Huh? How can you be collateral
|
|
|
Hooliganz wrote:
> If a borrower puts my name on a vehicle title as collateral for a loan,
> am I liable for that vehicle and any damages a driver may cause? If
> so, how can I protect myself?
It depends on whether you are listed as a lienholder
|
|
