|
|
In article <1nl6h2tkpnq43g6f70trf1f50lji1i7udi@4ax.com>,
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>Assume someone is to be deproted from the United States,
>but no other nation has requested extradition of that person.
>
>Is that person always free to leave
|
|
|
In article <uml6h29a6hv9c2lqo9c2mtuimj2h1ip6mo@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
>> many years ago, I read
>> that deliberately destroying paper money was a crime,
>> but it was not a crime to melt
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
>> many years ago, I read
>> that deliberately destroying paper money was a crime,
>> but it was not a crime to melt coins down for the metals.
>> Ostensibly his had something to do with the leg
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
> > many years ago, I read
> > that deliberately destroying paper money was a crime,
> > but it was not a crime to melt coins down for the metals.
> > Ostensibly his had something to do with th
|
|
|
Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:58:39 -0400 from <fredfighter@spamcop.net>:
> many years ago, I read
> that deliberately destroying paper money was a crime,
I can't believe that's true. *Defacing*, maybe; *destroying*, no.
If you want to burn your money, t
|
|
|
Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
> How about lawyers? Have they shot any lawyers yet? <look of
> intense anticipation and hope><g>
When I've heard of lawyers being shot, they're almost always divorce
lawyers.
Stu
|
|
|
kshrestha@juno.com wrote:
> Here's the situation (Sorry its long):
> We live in a house in Seattle that is technically ours (we've been
> paying the mortgage, taxes, insurance), but was purchased in my
> mother-in-laws name 3 years ago due to financ
|
|
|
<kshrestha@juno.com> wrote:
>Here's the situation (Sorry its long):
>We live in a house in Seattle that is technically ours (we've been
>paying the mortgage, taxes, insurance), but was purchased in my
>mother-in-laws name 3 years ago due to financial
|
|
|
kshrestha@juno.com wrote:
> We live in a house in Seattle that is technically ours (we've been
> paying the mortgage, taxes, insurance), but was purchased in my
> mother-in-laws name 3 years ago due to financial reasons. She is the
> only person in th
|
|
|
kshrestha@juno.com wrote:
> Now, we are looking to transfer the title of the house to our name
> and assume the mortgage.
>
> The best option we heard (from her mortgage Co and a local title
> Co) is through a quitclaim deed whereby we add our nam
|
|
|
Cpl Leach wrote:
> I purchased a couch in Feb on a layaway program ...
>
[Vendor claimed the couch was discontinued, now that he
wants a refund they claim they have it but he has already
decided to buy another]
>
> I stated that the paperwork
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <k3b2h2po3t4hck0baupn2mubuc6fs1gnt3@4ax.com>,
> <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>>> "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>> Good point - gotta love parliamentary sovereignty. Might the
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <k3b2h2po3t4hck0baupn2mubuc6fs1gnt3@4ax.com>,
> <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
> >> > "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> > Good point - gotta love parliamentary sovereignty. M
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>> > "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> writes:
>>> >
>>> >> > Good point - gotta love parliamentary sovereignty. Might the
>>> >> > backdoor in the US be the du
|
|
|
I live with my mom. Lately she has been talking about kicking me out.
Her house is legally in my name for reasons too long to explain, but it
was her inherited money that bought it. (It was never in her name to
begin with, it was originally owned by th
|
|
|
In article <lml6h2pu5coqeu8b2t6q987j2n7r4o0lon@4ax.com>,
Riki <ebucher96@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Also, the newest development is that I called the local radio lawyer
>talk show. It's a once a week legal advice show. I explained the
>problem and asked whi
|
|
