|
|
===========================================================
Oral argument previews:
Prepared by the liibulletin editorial board:
< http://www.law.cornell.edu/bulletin/board_current.htm >
=======================================================
|
|
|
Apologies if the attributions are munged, Google is not handling
replies to this newsgroup as it does others.
Barry Gold wrote:
>In article <1nl6h2tkpnq43g6f70trf1f50lji1i7...@4ax.com>,
<fredfigh...@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>Assume someone is to be de
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:29:50 -0400, violetvache@yahoo.com wrote:
>Many years ago I did legal secretary work and often would draw up
>letters in which my employer informed clients that because of
>non-payment they should no longer consider him their a
|
|
|
violetvache@yahoo.com wrote:
> Many years ago I did legal secretary work and often would draw up
> letters in which my employer informed clients that because of
> non-payment they should no longer consider him their attorney.
>
> I would like to k
|
|
|
In article <pml6h25841qtgsnvclgua9s2ripbkg20qh@4ax.com>,
AsymF <fearful.asymmetry@gmail.com> wrote:
>Are there any legal restrictions related to an S-corp in NC doing
>active stock trading and investing with the funds it has on hand?
>
*NOT* an N.C
|
|
|
"Should I do anything to prevent his libelous statements from causing
me harm in the future?"
The statements are not libelous because he sent them directly to you in
a letter. He has not (that you seem to be aware of, anyway) published
them.
Othe
|
|
|
In article <55meh2tpaea9mppfvk29rasgh8ud8vqk3p@4ax.com>,
johnmolinda@yahoo.com <johnmolinda@yahoo.com> wrote:
>As I understand it State Police are creations of their state's
>Legislature and are only policemen within their state. Once a
>policeman le
|
|
|
In article <55meh2tpaea9mppfvk29rasgh8ud8vqk3p@4ax.com>,
johnmolinda@yahoo.com <johnmolinda@yahoo.com> wrote:
>As I understand it State Police are creations of their state's
>Legislature and are only policemen within their state. Once a
>policeman le
|
|
|
In article <tn3ih21sacksupnktscdpeptf4irsi7m2j@4ax.com>,
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>I've occasionally wondered about this. Every 5 years or so I have
>reason to drive from Los Angeles to Phoenix. The I-10 goes past a
>town (Blythe) with a
|
|
|
Apologies if the attributions are munged, Google is not handling
replies to this newsgroup as it does others.
Stan Brown wrote:
Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:20:15 -0400 from johnmoli...@yahoo.com
<johnmoli...@yahoo.com>:
....
>> What would happen if you
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:29:42 -0400, sparks691@centurytel.net wrote:
>I am nearing the end of a drawn out settlement over an auto accident.
>The other party was 100% at fault and now, thanks to our lawyer, his
>insurance carrier has thrown in the towe
|
|
|
Hi everyone:
You may or may not know about the class action lawsuit that was
filed in California against Netflix.com for "throttling" their
customers. Throttling is a practice whereby netflix delibrately slow
down the mailing of the movies to
|
|
|
>Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>>Finally, why would you give (part of) the property to your s-i-l? If
>>you gave it to your daughter you would at least avoid having your
>>s-i-l sell it after a divorce. [But her share of the property would
>>cou
|
|
|
dtushingham@gmail.com wrote:
[OP thinks he's getting phone calls from a person pretending to be a
policeman]
>
> My question is this, can I do anything about this guy pretending to be
> a
> police officer ?
>
By anything, yes. You can jump up
|
|
|
dtushingham@gmail.com wrote:
> I had kept a Hertz car longer than the contract.
>
> I did not receive any calls from Hertz asking me to return the car.
> I received multiple calls from a "Detective Clark" asking me to call
> him, he told me he was
|
|
|
Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:29:39 -0400 from <dtushingham@gmail.com>:
You kept a rental car long enough past the rental period that Hertz
actually sent you a letter asking for it back. You got a message from
a "Detective Clark".
> My question is this,
|
|
|
dtushingham@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had kept a Hertz car longer than the contract.
>
> I did not receive any calls from Hertz asking me to return the car.
>
> They delivered a registered letter to my apartment in Manhattan, I was
> not in
|
|
|
In article <gn3ih2l6tn8mhdgmlufgbsopdted9qrvpc@4ax.com>,
dtushingham@gmail.com wrote:
> I had kept a Hertz car longer than the contract.
Did you do that with permission, ie, you called Hertz and
negotiated an extension? If not, then you committe
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I am a renter and rent under a self-extending yearly lease.
I've been renting with this landlord for over 6 years. The apartment is in
the Back Bay in Boston, MA.
I have not caused any problems and every single rent-payment during
|
|
|
Hi all
Even having to ask about this makes my skin crawl. The "hypothetical"
scenario is:
Wife, in her 80's, is physically frail years after a stroke, and from
the treatments required to prevent further strokes. Recently diagnosed
in the early st
|
|
|
I would like to know how the law applies to this situation, you incur a
debt (say, a utility bill) in one state, but move to another state,
leaving the bill unpaid. Can the utility company seek a judgement
against the debtor which is enforceable in the
|
|
|
dreamlooper wrote:
> my wife (we are living seperately and have been for years)is filing
> bankruptcy...one credit card (discover) has both our names but we both
> remember that i was on the card as an authorized user and not as a
> joint card holder.
|
|
|
dreamlooper <dreamlooper@gmail.com> wrote:
>my wife (we are living seperately and have been for years)is filing
>bankruptcy...one credit card (discover) has both our names but we both
>remember that i was on the card as an authorized user and not as a
|
|
|
>one credit card (discover) has both our names but we both
>remember that i was on the card as an authorized user and not as a
>joint card holder
if it's a large enough sum of money, you can try hiring a lawyer and
see if he or she can get Discover
|
|
|
In article <g4meh21rdduqpqjs9prbstims76a8hh6oi@4ax.com>,
<socalmk@gmail.com> wrote:
>I have a website and I am currently asking people to submit short films
>for a contest that I am holding. I am giving away cash and similar
>prizes (gift certificat
|
|
|
I posted this on a similar group but have not gotten a response.
Not sure if anyone can answer this but I want to start an online
restaurant guide for local restaurants in my area. I will have basic
listings at no cost and enhanced listings that will h
|
|
|
I have questions concerning ECOA Regulation B and the Fair Credit
Billing Act. I received an adverse action notice from a credit card
company and the notice listed four reasons. I made follow-up inquiries
with the firm and was advised that none of the
|
|
|
<serendipity1276@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rm3ih29itf9fc6gi2h4id8dmvdf95p71p6@4ax.com...
>I bought a few DVD's of movies from the store. I created a room on
> Paltalk, and instead of broadcasting my webcam live, I'm able to
> broadcast wha
|
|
|
Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:29:28 -0400 from serendipity1276@yahoo.com
<serendipity1276@yahoo.com>:
> I bought a few DVD's of movies from the store. I created a room on
> Paltalk, and instead of broadcasting my webcam live, I'm able to
> broadcast what I s
|
|
|
In article <rm3ih29itf9fc6gi2h4id8dmvdf95p71p6@4ax.com>,
serendipity1276@yahoo.com <serendipity1276@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I bought a few DVD's of movies from the store. I created a room on
>Paltalk, and instead of broadcasting my webcam live, I'm able t
|
|
|
> I bought a few DVD's of movies from the store. I created a room on
> Paltalk, and instead of broadcasting my webcam live, I'm able to
> broadcast what I see on my DVD. So others in that room will be able to
> watch the same DVD that I'm watching o
|
|
|
In article <pm3ih2933am60a8piln89urfhef8k4oi1q@4ax.com>,
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>If your neighbor *does* have a written contract with the former owner
>that allows him to use the stairs,
and that contract was not recorded on the deed, d
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:29:27 -0400, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
>If your neighbor *does* have a written contract with the former owner
>that allows him to use the stairs, his use must still be "reasonable".
>Foot traffic on a stone stairway is
|
|
