|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <o3b2h2102ro2br2t30km3tqi97042if5ia@4ax.com>,
> <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Is 'making change' the same as buying smaller
>>denominations of currency?
>
>
> Not anyplace with sales tax.
>
>
|
|
|
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:09:50 -0400, "Chadwick Stone©"
<chad_stone@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>Perhaps first you should explain how a U.S. court has jurisdiction over
>a U.K. based company and the legal mechanism the plaintiff will employ
>to collect judgment
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
[within multiple levels of interior quote]
>>> > > > - Spamhaus shall post, within five business days of the date of this
>>> > > > order, on its website
>>> > > > at both the main home page and at the ROKSO
|
|
|
In article <e3k4i2dauk4a5605omqvjqichef53lpktj@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>If a UK company performs an act that causes injury in the US, the US
>courts have jurisdiction over it.
Even if the act was performed ent
|
|
|
"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in
news:e3k4i2dauk4a5605omqvjqichef53lpktj@4ax.com:
> "Chadwick Stone©" <chad_stone@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps first you should explain how a U.S. court has jurisdiction
>> over a U.K. based
|
|
|
In <e3k4i2dauk4a5605omqvjqichef53lpktj@4ax.com>, on 10/03/2006
at 07:59 AM, "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> said:
>If a UK company performs an act that causes injury in the US, the US
>courts have jurisdiction over it.
The London
|
|
|
*brief* quote/summary of previous article: OP poses question in
subject line
Depending on whether or not the act was premeditated, and
on the severity of the act, the proper term would be battery,
manslaughter, or murder.
Personally, I would
|
|
|
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:20:39 -0400, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>Is 'hot pursuit doctrine' a product of reciprocity agreements between
>adjoining states, or is it derived from common law or some
>Constitutional provision?
Fresh pursuit is deriv
|
|
|
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:40:06 -0400, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
>. . . .
>My understanding was that "hot pursuit" worked within a state for
>misdemeanors, but only for felonies across state lines. Once you're
>in another state, he's not a p
|
|
|
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>[chasing a speeder across a state line]
>> Yes, but suppose as soon as he turns on his lights you slow down to a
>> legal speed. He chases you across the border, and...
>>
>> My understanding was that "hot pursuit
|
|
|
In article <c3k4i2hkgnt23ke8222bdfp5jmf5l1vu57@4ax.com>,
petshopqueen007@yahoo.com wrote:
> anyways, if lets say they DID go ahead and sued her, and set it up with
> the courts already, can she still avoid going to court by contacting
> the company
|
|
|
In article <a3k4i2p0cq0c7rn3imm18v1i1uh4bubpdq@4ax.com>,
seatere@gmail.com <seatere@gmail.com> wrote:
>I was wondering what the accepted legal reasons are (other than the
>obvious, such as marriage or divorce) for name and surname change. For
>example
|
|
|
In article <a3k4i2p0cq0c7rn3imm18v1i1uh4bubpdq@4ax.com>,
seatere@gmail.com <seatere@gmail.com> wrote:
>I was wondering what the accepted legal reasons are (other than the
>obvious, such as marriage or divorce) for name and surname change.
You want t
|
|
|
seatere@gmail.com wrote:
> I was wondering what the accepted legal reasons are (other than the
> obvious, such as marriage or divorce) for name and surname change. For
> example if you are doing it because you are scared your abusive ex is
> going to
|
|
|
news@absamail.co.za wrote:
> Please strictly define: 'delictual liability'.
See Negligence, "delictual" is (mostly) merely a euphemism
If you need better than that.....
Amazon can provide you with both soft and hard cover books on the topic
o
|
|
|
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:20:27 -0400, Paul Cassel
<pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>By anything, yes. You can jump up and down. You can shout or turn about.
>If you mean to stop him, yes to that too. Report him to the police
>authorities in
|
|
|
TheMightyAtlas <themightyatlast@gmail.com> wrote:
>On another newsgroup (misc.taxes.moderated) there is a discussion going
>where several regulars are (at least half joking) advising that a
>particular poster pospone his marriage from Dec 29 to Jan 2,
|
|
|
In article <33k4i2thvknktdagrilchal1vhash6uh25@4ax.com>,
"TheMightyAtlas" <themightyatlast@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since the poster has made all the arrangements, and the postponement of
> the wedding "event" would be expensive and extremely unromantic
|
|
|
Hello,
I understand that, generally, any photos submitted as evidence must be
authenticated by a witness, who basically says: "I saw this and that's
what it looked like." But there are many situations where a photo is
taken and there is no witness.
|
|
|
Hi
I am in bankruptcy, and have an ARAP lien before the bankruptcy.
My assets are clearly protected under California's exemptions except
for a patent which is in use. The ARAP lien is on personal property
for one year.
My attorney says the lien c
|
|
|
> andreal@usa.com wrote:
>> Hi, I'm moving out of my apartment I have lived in for 4 years. They
>> did a walk through (it's a small studio) and are charging me almost
>> $450 out of my deposit for painting, carpet cleaning and general
>> cleaning (no
|
|
|
I have a question about whether a product I'm offering for sale
involves a copyright violation.
The item is a set of digital 3D models textured with facsimiles of
wrapping paper offered for sale by various gift wrap vendors (e.g.,
Paper Direct). Ple
|
|
|
Andy asks:
It has been reported that Foley made "questionable" comments in an
Email
to a 16 year old boy who was a page. The age of consent in DC is 16.
So, did Foley satisfy the legal requirements of "pedophilia", "
statutory rape",
or "s
|
|
|
Well upon the DVD is it an original DVD and Do you hold the receipt for
the Purchase also?
Upon Title 17 of the United States Code sections 501 & 506, Explains
you must have Holder in Due Course Laws active. Or You can be subject
to Title 18 Crimes a
|
|
