|
|
My sister was recently involved in a minor accident. According to her
(trying to be objective here), she was driving down South Huntington Av
in Jamaica Plain in front of the VA hospital, when a car failed to
yield at Heath Street, pulled into her lane
|
|
|
John F. Carr wrote:
> In article <q80qh2h6hj8cfmgsp61pq7mp83uecnvqni@4ax.com>,
> JSmith <jsmith246@mailinator.com> wrote:
> >
> >FWIW, a colleague with Chinese citizenship (landed immigrant in Canada)
> >was stopped in Chicago while en route from B
|
|
|
Jeff Wisnia wrote:
> Seth Breidbart wrote:
>
> > In article <o3b2h2102ro2br2t30km3tqi97042if5ia@4ax.com>,
> > <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Is 'making change' the same as buying smaller
> >>denominations of currency?
> >
> >
>
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>>If a UK company performs an act that causes injury in the US, the
>>US courts have jurisdiction over it.
>
> Even if the act was performed entirely in
|
|
|
Morely Dotes <morelydotes@spamblocked.com> wrote:
> "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>> If a UK company performs an act that causes injury in the US, the
>> US courts have jurisdiction over it.
>
> Really? So if Orange causes
|
|
|
X-No-Archive: YES
Stuart A. Bronstein [spamtrap@lexregia.com] has entered into testimony
e3k4i2dauk4a5605omqvjqichef53lpktj@4ax.com
> "Chadwick Stone©" <chad_stone@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps first you should explain how a U.S. court has jurisdi
|
|
|
n 3 Oct 2006, "Chris Glur" news@absamail.co.za wrote:
> Please contribute an opinion on the points of this ruling
> which confuse me [in which a So. African court reported at
> http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/steenkamp.htm
> ruled that s
|
|
|
In article <1c97i2lcb409q7ki5kd562id2v3df48j6r@4ax.com>,
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>TheMightyAtlas <themightyatlast@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Since the poster has made all the arrangements, and the postponement of
>>the wedding "event" would be ex
|
|
|
I live in Connecticut, and want to have my 16 year old son drug-tested.
The doctor said I can't do that without my son's permission. Is this
true? I thought I got to be in charge until he turned 18.
He recently got his driver's license and has p
|
|
|
I haven't been paying much attention to that darling of the war on drugs, civil
forfeiture, recently. But... the "It's True" newsletter reported a disturbing
story the other day:
In 2003, Californian Emiliano Gomez Gonzolez was pulled over in Nebras
|
|
|
In article <23k4i2hqubn6pt1k6udfe4dc59s8dsbs2o@4ax.com>,
Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>Now, taking your 'hypothetical' as a base -- if you enter into a contract
>with that 16-year-old to shovel off your driveway after every snow
|
|
|
In article <ub97i210ch0kt4t1d5ac7tfgpik1ove7h1@4ax.com>,
wcsnyder@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I understand that, generally, any photos submitted as evidence must be
> authenticated by a witness, who basically says: "I saw this and that's
> wha
|
|
|
In article <ub97i210ch0kt4t1d5ac7tfgpik1ove7h1@4ax.com>,
<wcsnyder@gmail.com> wrote:
>I understand that, generally, any photos submitted as evidence must be
>authenticated by a witness, who basically says: "I saw this and that's
>what it looked lik
|
|
|
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:14:32 -0400, "AndyS" <andysharpe@juno.com>
wrote:
>Andy asks:
> It has been reported that Foley made "questionable" comments in an
>Email to a 16 year old boy who was a page. The age of consent in DC is 16.
> So, did
|
|
|
AndyS wrote:
> It has been reported that Foley made "questionable" comments in an
> Email
> to a 16 year old boy who was a page. The age of consent in DC is 16.
Besides forgetting to say that it was just, ewwww, tacky of Foley to
come on to tee
|
|
|
AndyS wrote:
> So, exactly what crime did he commit ?
He violated the rules of the Library of Congress by bending over the
pages.
--
- David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu>
Recycling -- it's good for the environment
|
|
|
AndyS wrote:
> It has been reported that Foley made "questionable" comments in an
> Email
> to a 16 year old boy who was a page. The age of consent in DC is 16.
***
> So, exactly what crime did he commit ?
Conduct does not have to be crimina
|
|
|
In article <lb97i21jtm0alrlrqfemsk045m1eockk41@4ax.com>,
Lawman of God <lawprofessor23@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Well upon the DVD is it an original DVD
No, it's the 87,453rd stamped out in this run.
> and Do you hold the receipt for the Purchase also?
|
|
