misc.legal.moderated

<threespeed18@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hit9i21ferk9nstahpu8ugj5nut9c9jvmk@4ax.com... <now my parents are freaking out thinking that their insurance rates are going to go up. If I recall correctly, if she is found at fauly, it will be my s

In article <hit9i21ferk9nstahpu8ugj5nut9c9jvmk@4ax.com>, <threespeed18@hotmail.com> wrote: > My sister was recently involved in a minor accident. According to her > (trying to be objective here), she was driving down South Huntington Av > in Jamaica

Note crossposting. Mr Daneliuk seems to have me confused with another author. Regardless: OP stated that 'terrorists' are not protected by the Geneva Conventions. I pointed out that _prisoners_ of a nation other than their own, are always prote

"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in news:ait9i292u0s428a8l9mde7aql6laehjbe0@4ax.com: > Do you mean that UK courts wouldn't hear a case in which someone in the > US, for example, sent poisonous candy to someone in the UK, resultin

"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in news:ait9i292u0s428a8l9mde7aql6laehjbe0@4ax.com: > Here's a quote from a US case: > > " United States jurisdiction extends to acts occurring outside its > territory if those acts are intende

Le 05 Oct 2006, "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> a écrit : > Do you mean that UK courts wouldn't hear a case in which someone in the > US, for example, sent poisonous candy to someone in the UK, resulting > in injury or death? Thi

Stuart A. Bronstein wrote: > Yes, if the tortuous effect was in the US. I'd have thought an Attorney at Law would by now have known how to spell tortious... Bruce

In article <ec97i21p4e9kee6srgma723op112hn4va2@4ax.com>, Daniel R. Reitman <dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote: >On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:40:06 -0400, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote: > >>. . . . > >>My understanding was that "hot pursuit" worked within a

Bernie Cosell wrote: > Has the judicial community really pushed things to the point where "may > have been" is a sufficient standard of proof to uphold a forfeiture? [I > assume that since this was a circuit decision, Mr Gonzolez's money is gonzo >

Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:59:57 -0400 from <petshopqueen007@yahoo.com>: [unpaid credit-card bills] > anyways, if lets say they DID go ahead and sued her, and set it up with > the courts already, can she still avoid going to court by contacting > the compan

Earlier this afternoon a bust occurned next door to us. During this time we were in and out of the house doing rurnning around. Later after all was said and done and the cops/detectives left, we noticed HUGE track marks in our front yard. We called

Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:59:55 -0400 from seatere@gmail.com <seatere@gmail.com>: > I was wondering what the accepted legal reasons are (other than the > obvious, such as marriage or divorce) for name and surname change. "I just felt like it." That's

newworldactor@yahoo.com wrote: > Hello, > > My friend runs a construction company that is getting attacked by > anonymous (all that is known is thier first name and city) poster(s) on > the net (he is clean with the BBB). Stuff on this "blog" styl

Barry Gold wrote: > TheMightyAtlas <themightyatlast@gmail.com> wrote: > >On another newsgroup (misc.taxes.moderated) there is a discussion going > >where several regulars are (at least half joking) advising that a > >particular poster pospone his ma

Ann_Hedonia <Ann_Hedonia@hotmail.com> wrote: >I live in Connecticut, and want to have my 16 year old son drug-tested. > The doctor said I can't do that without my son's permission. Is this >true? I thought I got to be in charge until he turned 18. >

Ann_Hedonia wrote: > I live in Connecticut, and want to have my 16 year old son drug-tested. > The doctor said I can't do that without my son's permission. ... > [OP took his drivers license away but cannot drop him from the insurance policy.]

Ann_Hedonia wrote: > I live in Connecticut, and want to have my 16 year old son drug-tested. > The doctor said I can't do that without my son's permission. Is this > true? I thought I got to be in charge until he turned 18. > .. The insurance c

Hi, my question is almost too difficiult to articulate.. to articulate. Several years ago, encountered a latin phrase, which says in effect if a contract requires one to do A, and doing A inherently excludes doing B, then the contract is understood a

sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: > >>Unfortunately for you, a 'failure to perform' by a minor is -not- >>an actionable breach, and thus, if you withhold payment under the >>given circumstan

I live in the Dallas area and during a move last month, the moving company tried to rip me off by changing their not to exceed bid to a fixed bid when it came to payment time. Their original bid was labeled as "not to exceed", which they verbally

On Oct 4, 8:14 am, wcsny...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I understand that, generally, any photos submitted as evidence must be > authenticated by a witness, who basically says: "I saw this and that's > what it looked like." But there are many sit

marcia <design1@insight.rr.com> wrote: >I have a question about whether a product I'm offering for sale >involves a copyright violation. > >The item is a set of digital 3D models textured with facsimiles of >wrapping paper offered for sale by various

AndyS wrote: > Andy asks: > > It has been reported that Foley made "questionable" comments in an > Email > to a 16 year old boy who was a page. The age of consent in DC is 16. > > So, did Foley satisfy the legal requirements of "pedophilia"

On Oct 4, 8:14 am, "AndyS" <andysha...@juno.com> wrote: > It has been reported that Foley made "questionable" comments in an > Email > to a 16 year old boy who was a page. The age of consent in DC is 16. > > So, did Foley satisfy the legal re

AndyS <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote: > It has been reported that Foley made "questionable" comments in an >Email >to a 16 year old boy who was a page. The age of consent in DC is 16. > > So, did Foley satisfy the legal requirements of "pedophilia",

Lawman of God <lawprofessor23@yahoo.com> wrote: >Well upon the DVD is it an original DVD and Do you hold the receipt for >the Purchase also? Partly irrelevant. Possession of the original DVD is adequate proof that you are entitled to that copy, for

I have a general question. Perhaps you can help me decide if hiring a lawyer is necessary. I worked full time as a commissioned loan officer at a mortgage broker in WI. In June of 2006 I gave a written request to the president of the company askin