|
|
In article <h5qhi29uqd6s3kqd3lmflv7tdthp2fpgpr@4ax.com>,
Biker Geek <bikergeek@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>I've often wondered this myself about auto theft. If someone
>from, say, Concord parks in the Alewife T garage and his/her car
>gets stolen, does
|
|
|
fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
> rec.woodworking removed from distribution as this discussion is
> off-topic
> there.
>
> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> > fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
> > > Note crossposting.
> > ...
>
> Brief summary: The issue in d
|
|
|
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
[..huge snip..]
> Finally, I read the Fourth Protocol as a morally responsible
> and law-abiding person reads all humanitarian law, reading
> it as a set of standards and guidelines for the treatment of
> human be
|
|
|
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:04:43 -0400, Morely Dotes
<morelydotes@spamblocked.com> wrote:
>Not at all. In order to establish jurisdiction, the plaintiff must *first*
>establish intent. Absent intentional harm, there is no jurisdiction.
Correction. A
|
|
|
Morely Dotes <morelydotes@spamblocked.com> wrote:
> (John F. Carr) wrote
>
>>>> " United States jurisdiction extends to acts occurring outside
>>>> its territory if those acts are intended to produce detrimental
>>>> effects in the United States."
|
|
|
In article <0qici2lca837vb8gtv9vtvob3b9e8adinu@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>Bernie Cosell wrote:
>
>> Has the judicial community really pushed things to the point where "may
>> have been" is a sufficient standard of pr
|
|
|
In article <55qhi29c7u2u1p3mj7mrjlj4f829g47rrv@4ax.com>,
Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>But the intention of having sex with a minor and the thought that you
>were dealing with a minor were there. Much like if you walked up to a
|
|
|
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:04:07 -0400, jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
>Last month the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that it's just
>as illegal to want sex with an imaginary minor as a real one:
>http://www.socialaw.com/slip.htm?cid=16471&sid=11
|
|
|
Mike Anderson wrote:
>
> But the intention of having sex with a minor and the thought that you
> were dealing with a minor were there. Much like if you walked up to a
> bum laying in an alley and shot him, not knowing he died 2 minutes
> before
|
|
|
John F. Carr wrote:
> Last month the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that it's just
> as illegal to want sex with an imaginary minor as a real one:
>
> http://www.socialaw.com/slip.htm?cid=16471&sid=119
>
> The defendant was charged with attempt
|
|
|
Mike Anderson wrote:
> But the intention of having sex with a minor and the thought that you
> were dealing with a minor were there. Much like if you walked up to a
> bum laying in an alley and shot him, not knowing he died 2 minutes
> before of a h
|
|
|
Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:04:07 -0400 from John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu>:
> Last month the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that it's just
> as illegal to want sex with an imaginary minor as a real one:
>
> http://www.socialaw.com/slip.htm?cid=16471&sid=119
|
|
|
In article <05qhi2h2v2t8tf47uocpcaegn6074eag8n@4ax.com>,
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
>The homeowner / suspect is awaken, assumes it's another thief trying to
>steal from him for the N-th time, pulls out his weapon and kills both
>team
|
|
|
In article <05qhi2h2v2t8tf47uocpcaegn6074eag8n@4ax.com>,
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
>The AZ Governor recently signed a law allowing an affirmative defense
>for homeowners who shoot intruders. There was significant discussion,
>and a fa
|
|
|
On 17/Nov/2001 the British security service MI5 tried to kill me in
Florida, the culmination of a 16 year campaign of harassment, as shown
on webpage;
http://www.mi5.com/evidence/#deathsquad
A group of seven men stood outside my apartment shouting l
|
|
|
In article <u4qhi21bcjhrob38eoel3im1j8ghhe1p3a@4ax.com>,
Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Now obviously this dysfunctional family has bigger problems than this
>down-payment not-a-loan,
Starting with an incompetent contract drafter: their _wil
|
|
|
On 8 Oct 2006, "Stan" <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>An adult child needs a loan from the Bank of Mom and Dad for a down
>payment on a house; however, in evaluating the borrower's financial
>condition, including where the down payment is coming from
|
|
|
In article <u4qhi21bcjhrob38eoel3im1j8ghhe1p3a@4ax.com>,
"Stan" <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is loosely based on a situation I encountered.
>
> An adult child needs a loan from the Bank of Mom and Dad for a down
> payment on a house; how
|
|
|
Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:03:44 -0400 from Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com>:
> 1. The lender wants Mommy and Daddy to sign an ironclad agreement that
> the money is an unconditional gift, which includes every bit of
> legalese that makes it legally clear that t
|
|
|
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:03:37 -0400, "Stuart A. Bronstein"
<spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>I remember seeing a story about one California couple that were running
>late to catch a plane, so they asked the judge (they went to the
>courthouse for a q
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Sat, 07 Oct 2006 07:20:38 -0400 from C. Mundi <cmundi@gmail.com>:
>> I am not a lawyer, obviously.
>
> You want to know whether you're obligated to report it to the
> authorities if someone tried to get you to commit a crime. Th
|
|
|
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:02:54 -0400, "alphazip@yahoo.com"
<alphazip@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I have a question that relates to the judicial system in Canada, but is
>probably the same in the U.S. Here's the situation. A person sues a
>government departmen
|
|
|
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:02:46 -0400, William Brenner
<wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
>A recent news item stated that a man is attempting to cease paying court
>approved alimony to his ex wife. It seems that the ex wife has since
>had sex change
|
|
|
William Brenner <wbrenner@nospamplease.net> wrote:
> A recent news item stated that a man is attempting to cease paying
> court approved alimony to his ex wife. It seems that the ex wife
> has since had sex change surgery, and now presents as a man.
|
|
|
William Brenner wrote:
> A recent news item stated that a man is attempting to cease paying court
> approved alimony to his ex wife. It seems that the ex wife has since
> had sex change surgery, and now presents as a man.
>
> The ex husband claim
|
|
|
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> "AndyS" <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote
>> While such actions should not be tolerated by our
>> representatives, it's important not to get into the habit of
>> punishing someone for something they might do in th
|
|
|
Mark A wrote:
> This is not correct. There are laws against conspiracy to commit certain
> crimes in the future. See discussion in the other thread you started.
Andy writes:
You are correct, of course. However, I was not considering that
plot
|
|
