|
|
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:06:53 -0400, Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
> Morely Dotes <morelydotes@spamblocked.com> wrote:
>> (John F. Carr) wrote
>>
>>>>> " United States jurisdiction extends to acts occurring outside its
>>>>> territory if those acts ar
|
|
|
Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote in
news:a5qhi2t8gns18kvevkibiir3e0ljal2fj7@4ax.com:
> Morely Dotes wrote:
>> "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in
>> news:ait9i292u0s428a8l9mde7aql6laehjbe0@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Here's
|
|
|
X-No-Archive: YES
Stuart A. Bronstein [spamtrap@lexregia.com] has entered into testimony
8leki2p7e1kamgam6uffogrmr1rutl7o9g@4ax.com
> Morely Dotes <morelydotes@spamblocked.com> wrote:
>> (John F. Carr) wrote
>>
>>>>> " United States jurisdiction e
|
|
|
jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
>A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Bernie Cosell wrote:
>>
>>> Has the judicial community really pushed things to the point where "may
>>> have been" is a sufficient standard of proof to uphold a fo
|
|
|
AndyS wrote:
> Andy writes:
>
> The recent postings about pedophilia and sexual predators have
> prompted a question in my mind....
>
> The law clearly states that soliciting sex from a minor is illegal
> and has dire consequences.
>
>
|
|
|
In article <ukeki2p14j7etbo0vsbelsr62ju3sbs9s0@4ax.com>,
AndyS <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
> So, if a guy sees a pretty girl in the parking lot and thinks that
>it would be a real kick to rape her, but decides not to because he
>changes his mind,
|
|
|
In article <tkeki21eumehdqh7pms43tckb78s3vakvj@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:04:07 -0400 from John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu>:
>> Last month the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that it's just
>> as illegal
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
>
> What has happened to the law? It has moved from punishing harm to
> persons to punishing attempted harm to person to punishing mere
> thoughts, with no possibility of harm to persons.
>
It has vanished under a cloud of so
|
|
|
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>Mike Anderson wrote:
>>
>> But the intention of having sex with a minor and the thought that you
>> were dealing with a minor were there. Much like if you walked up to a
>> bum laying in an al
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> What about the Fifth Amendment against taking private property for
> public use without just compensation?
Trumped by the defendant's (and society's) right to a fair trial, equal
protection, etc.
|
|
|
I was recently involved in a car accident (3 mos old 2006 Accord) on
the freeway (65 mph speed limit):
- a guy in a pick-up truck on the lane to my right cut me off
- I was going to change to the lane on my left, but saw another vehicle
in my blind sp
|
|
|
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:06:07 -0400, MI5.Victim@privacy.net wrote:
>On 17/Nov/2001 the British security service MI5 tried to kill me in
>Florida, the culmination of a 16 year campaign of harassment, as shown
>on webpage;
>http://www.mi5.com/evidence/
|
|
|
In article <hkeki2te17ul4ncnd64mdahagp2gkh739o@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:03:44 -0400 from Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com>:
> > 1. The lender wants Mommy and Daddy to sign an ironclad agreement that
|
|
|
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:05:35 -0400, "Daniel R. Reitman"
<dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:03:37 -0400, "Stuart A. Bronstein"
><spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>I remember seeing a story about one California couple that were ru
|
|
|
>bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
>> Remember that marriage is a _state_ matter. In most states, the
>> act that constitutes a legal "marriage" is signing the marriage
>> certificate, together with possession of a valid marriage license.
>> The form
|
|
|
Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:05:28 -0400 from Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2
@comremovecast.net>:
> Stan Brown wrote:
> > Sat, 07 Oct 2006 07:20:38 -0400 from C. Mundi <cmundi@gmail.com>:
> >> I am not a lawyer, obviously.
> >
> > You want to know whether you'
|
|
|
C. Mundi <cmundi@gmail.com> wrote:
[OP asks whether you are required to report it if you are solicited to
commit a crime. Does the rule change if you have reason to believe
the person will then go on to solicit others to perform the same
act.]
It
|
|
|
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 08:05:20 -0400, "Mike Jacobs"
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>alphazip@yahoo.com wrote:
>> I have a question that relates to the judicial system in Canada, but is
>> probably the same in the U.S.
>
>Since what you're asking is a
|
|
|
I had a lawyer draw up a Medicaid payback trust for my disabled
daughter to take care of a substantial amount of funds in her name and
make her eligible for SSI and Medicaid.
I applied for SSI and told them about the trust and they said they
didn't
|
|
|
It's very hard to follow the points you're trying to make, but I'll attempt
to do so.
"Lawman of God" <lawprofessor23@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lb97i21jtm0alrlrqfemsk045m1eockk41@4ax.com...
> Well upon the DVD is it an original DVD and Do y
|
|
