|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>>If you do something that you know will have an effect in the
>>United States, and it turns out to injure someone, US courts have
>>the power to adjudica
|
|
|
<lrbtav@gmail.com> wrote:
>I was hit with a public intox a while back and have a court date coming
>up. I will be read the charges against me and then decide if I'm
>going to plead guilty or not guilty. I'm considering pleading not
>guilty and getting
|
|
|
lrbtav@gmail.com wrote:
> I was hit with a public intox a while back and have a court date
> coming up. I will be read the charges against me and then decide
> if I'm going to plead guilty or not guilty. I'm considering
> pleading not guilty and get
|
|
|
lrbtav@gmail.com wrote:
> I was hit with a public intox a while back and have a court date coming
> up. I will be read the charges against me and then decide if I'm
> going to plead guilty or not guilty. I'm considering pleading not
> guilty and get
|
|
|
On Oct 7, 7:20 am, "AndyS" <andysha...@juno.com> wrote:
> But what about soliciting sex from an adult that is PRETENDING
> to be a minor, as is done in the police stings, often shown on TV.
>
> Since the actor never actually has any conve
|
|
|
[OP, KurtS.331@gmail.com, wants to know whether the police have to
compensate OP for damaging OP's lawn while effecting an arrest of OP's
neighbor.]
Let's assume for a moment that either OP can prove or that the relevant
police would admit to OP's f
|
|
|
Ruth wrote:
> You are entitled to the Actual Cash Value of the car. Since it only
> three months old, you will proboably end up with enough to buy another 2006
> Honda. However, if you financed it, you may be out the interest paid on the
> ol
|
|
|
Ruth wrote:
> You are entitled to the Actual Cash Value of the car. Since it only
> three months old, you will proboably end up with enough to buy another 2006
> Honda. However, if you financed it, you may be out the interest paid on the
> ol
|
|
|
LDC wrote:
>
> This must vary from state to state. My experience in California is that
> the insurance company will provide enough money to purchase a vehicle
> comparable to the one you lost. This means they would give you the
> prevailing reta
|
|
|
>>Second, inform your insurance company. Explain what happened and give them
>>a
>>copy of the accident report. If you have comprehensive coverage, the
>>"fair"
>>price is the local wholesale price of your car.
>
> No, the "fair" price is the loca
|
|
|
In article <rmasi2dnifin1je3fp45vbgldgvuhh0n2u@4ax.com>,
Dave <dave@dave.dave> wrote:
>
> In the early 1990's in Grover City, CA on 4th street a San Luis Obispo
>Narcotics task force executed a valid warrant in the middle of the night, but
>the wron
|
|
|
John D. Goulden wrote:
>
>
> It was suggested that I contact the hosting web site and partner and say
> something like: "hey, your business partner reneged on an offer that was
> posted on your web site / associated with signing up with your compan
|
|
|
David Ames wrote:
> jeanne_mcclintock@hotmail.com wrote:
> > What a horror story: (link to this story of the same title as the
> > Subject line of this email, at sfgate dot com.)
> >
> > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/30/B
|
|
|
In article <ub97i210ch0kt4t1d5ac7tfgpik1ove7h1@4ax.com>,
<wcsnyder@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I understand that, generally, any photos submitted as evidence must be
>authenticated by a witness, who basically says: "I saw this and that's
>what it
|
|
|
Allan,
In a discussion with others you were informed that some States, Tennessee
was specifically mentioned, require a belief in a god ( or perhaps God) as a
prerequisite to hold public office. You ask why this has not been challenged
and stru
|
|
|
Allan Adler <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> writes:
> I was also informed that 8 states have provisions in their constitutions
> which explicitly prohibit atheists from holding any public office. The
> respondent also quoted the section of the Tennessee c
|
|
|
Allan Adler <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote:
[OP asks about state constitutions with provisions that ban atheists
from holding public office. He notes the conflict with the ban on a
religious test for public office in the US Constitution -- Article
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:
>
> In some states, you can "appeal" a small claim court judgment to
> whatever court normally hears civil suits of that type. This results
> in a trial de novo. In California only the defendant can do this, and
> the trial wi
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:16:46 -0400 from Stuart A. Bronstein
> <spamtrap@lexregia.com>:
>
> > In California all small claims appeals are de novo trials.
>
> Is that legally an appeal or a new trial? I know the practical effect
> is
|
|
|
"Stan Brown" <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:emasi2hm6tth0u3pmis21bcm1kcp30kpkh@4ax.com...
> Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:16:46 -0400 from Stuart A. Bronstein
> <spamtrap@lexregia.com>:
>> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
|
|
|
In article <l3opi21nck3v5h4314408eaa91audpnfso@4ax.com>,
alphazip@yahoo.com <alphazip@yahoo.com> wrote:
>JSmith wrote:
>> You might note that, at least in Canada, the government will sometimes
>> (often? - I don't know) pay the legal expenses of the o
|
|
|
John wrote:
> I have heard in the past that Banks or Credit Unions cannot require you
> to use their own check vendor unless they provide the checks to you at
> no cost. I'd like to find support in the law for this, either statue
> or regulation,
|
|
|
I don't know if this is the right group for this, so I apologize if I
am posting to the wrong place.
I am a computer programmer working as a consultant on a 6 month
contract to hire. The temp company I'm working for gives no benefits
of any sort, j
|
|
