|
|
Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com wrote:
> Stuart, high marks for boiling down Asahi but I think you've
> compressed something relevant in Spamhaus in making the squib.
I was talking only about general principals. I really know little or
nothing about the S
|
|
|
In <eruvi2l52ouciquhdf886h21jfnm7e24hc@4ax.com>, on 10/13/2006
at 04:49 PM, "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> said:
>If you know that if you do A then B will happen, and you then do A,
>you legally intend B to happen.
Okay, so you f
|
|
|
herb_k@mail.com wrote:
> I'm about to join in a business venture with someone who has
> already established a Subchapter S Corporation in DE, where they
> reside. I live in PA.
>
> It seems reasonable for me to become part of the corporation, so
|
|
|
curlylaca@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> [exGF files restraining order to stop herself from seeing.calling
> exBF]
>
> My question is this:
> Are restraining orders public record? Or do they become public
> record only if the restrained party is in violat
|
|
|
yijiehu@gmail.com wrote:
> On the 6th (Friday), ...
was informed that I had failed to sign my rent
> check for October. I mailed out a new check on the 8th (Sunday) for
> the amount of my rent plus a late fee. On the 13th,
> ...my right to posse
|
|
|
In article <lrd9j2dqvsgg8qijkqrcdvo5350ni2soth@4ax.com>,
<yijiehu@gmail.com> wrote:
>On the 6th (Friday), I received a letter from the leasing office of my
>apartment building and was informed that I had failed to sign my rent
>check for October. I
|
|
|
<yijiehu@gmail.com> wrote:
>On the 6th (Friday), I received a letter from the leasing office of my
>apartment building and was informed that I had failed to sign my rent
>check for October. I mailed out a new check on the 8th (Sunday) for
>the amount
|
|
|
[OP wants to make spam and other "trespass to electronic chattel"
(my choice of words) a capital offense in AZ, via areferendum.]
The raison d'etre for the (they) CAN-SPAM (you) Act of 2003
(15 U.S.C. 7701, et seq., Public Law No. 108-187, was to
|
|
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:03:21 -0400 from Network Admin <c0
@earthlink.net>:
> With some of the unique propositions on the ballot this November, the
> lunchroom bull session came up with a question about executing spammers.
> If you could get the # o
|
|
|
>With some of the unique propositions on the ballot this November, the
>lunchroom bull session came up with a question about executing spammers.
> If you could get the # of signatures (hey, who wouldn't want to
>reduce / eliminate spam from their
|
|
|
In article <jrd9j2tl87vdg4mfb3kon1q7fe1i4se575@4ax.com>,
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
>With some of the unique propositions on the ballot this November, the
>lunchroom bull session came up with a question about executing spammers.
> I
|
|
|
Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
>With some of the unique propositions on the ballot this November, the
>lunchroom bull session came up with a question about executing spammers.
> If you could get the # of signatures (hey, who wouldn't wan
|
|
|
David Chesler wrote:
> John F. Carr wrote:
>> Last month the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that it's just
>> as illegal to want sex with an imaginary minor as a real one:
>>
>> http://www.socialaw.com/slip.htm?cid=16471&sid=119
>>
>> The defend
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <55qhi29c7u2u1p3mj7mrjlj4f829g47rrv@4ax.com>,
> Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>
>> But the intention of having sex with a minor and the thought that you
>> were dealing with a minor were there.
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <64opi29bduc89ps67rhqpj424f33tsaq4q@4ax.com>,
> <ddrury6@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> If that isn't a "thought crime", how about this one? It's from:
>>
>> http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/FSCview.asp?coid=303
>>
|
|
|
ddrury6@yahoo.com wrote:
> Seth Breidbart wrote:
>> In article <ukeki2p14j7etbo0vsbelsr62ju3sbs9s0@4ax.com>,
>> AndyS <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So, if a guy sees a pretty girl in the parking lot and thinks that
>>> it would be a real kic
|
|
|
AndyS wrote:
> Mike Anderson wrote:
>> But the intention of having sex with a minor and the thought that you
>> were dealing with a minor were there. Much like if you walked up to a
>> bum laying in an alley and shot him, not knowing he died 2 minutes
|
|
|
KurtS.331@gmail.com wrote:
> Earlier this afternoon a bust occurned next door to us. ... Later
> after all was said and done and the cops/detectives left, we noticed
> HUGE track marks in our front yard. ...
> What I want to know is...is there a
|
|
|
I used a parking garage in SF, CA. I don't live in SF and am entirely
unaware of rules in parking garages.
Anyways, the attendent handed me a ticket and an hour later I came back
to claim my car. Mysteriously, I lost the ticket! Now, he tells me
the
|
|
|
If one was to sign a waiver for negligence, would that person lose the
right to sue for gross negligence? Is there a legal distinction between
these two terms? This is in California.
Thanks
|
|
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:03:18 -0400 from <one_chanceever@yahoo.com>:
[credit-card dispute for $8000 over an Alaska trip]
> So.....since the guide lives in California but I live in London, can I
> sue him in Small Claims
> court here in the UK and enforce
|
|
|
one_chanceever@yahoo.com wrote:
> I was in Alaska on a fishing trip this Summer, and had a disasterous
> experience with a fishing "guide", who ended up banging almost $8,000
> onto my credit card after I got home to England. I have tried to have
> it
|
|
|
one_chanceever@yahoo.com wrote:
> I was in Alaska on a fishing trip this Summer, and had a
> disasterous experience with a fishing "guide", who ended up
> banging almost $8,000 onto my credit card after I got home to
> England. I have tried to have
|
|
|
Terry.McKenna@gmail.com wrote:
> I recently gave a negative reference for a former employee. I have
> moved on from the company a year ago and so has the employee.
>
> I was contacted by a recruiter asking for reference. I called the
> recruiter ba
|
|
|
>I recently gave a negative reference for a former employee. I have
> moved on from the company a year ago and so has the employee.
>
> I was contacted by a recruiter asking for reference. I called the
> recruiter back and left a message; I was hone
|
|
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:03:18 -0400 from <Terry.McKenna@gmail.com>:
> I recently gave a negative reference for a former employee. I have
> moved on from the company a year ago and so has the employee.
>
> I was contacted by a recruiter asking for refere
|
|
|
Terry.McKenna@gmail.com wrote:
> Can I or should I sue the company?
>
> Thanks,
Andy writes:
Well, exactly what did the company do that they didn't have a
right to do.... A fellow that gets a bad reference sort of has
a right to know who
|
|
|
Terry.McKenna@gmail.com wrote:
> I recently gave a negative reference for a former employee. I have
> moved on from the company a year ago and so has the employee.
>
> I was contacted by a recruiter asking for reference. I called the
> recruiter ba
|
|
|
Terry.McKenna@gmail.com wrote:
[gave negative reference to recruiter]
>
> The recruiter played the message back to the former employee and the
> former employee called me and threatens bodily harm to me.
>
> Can I or should I sue the company?
>
|
|
|
In article <brd9j25qg7grccseh4o61bo9u017g6oqt4@4ax.com>,
<Terry.McKenna@gmail.com> wrote:
>I recently gave a negative reference for a former employee. I have
>moved on from the company a year ago and so has the employee.
>
>I was contacted by a recr
|
|
|
Terry.McKenna@gmail.com wrote:
> I recently gave a negative reference for a former employee. I have
> moved on from the company a year ago and so has the employee.
>
> I was contacted by a recruiter asking for reference. I called the
> recruiter ba
|
|
|
I am curious - if a corporation has debts due to running cost etc and
at some point has to file bankruptsy, due the debts die with the corp
or do they get passed onto the directors? I always thought LLP meant
they died with the corp, but now I am not
|
|
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:03:17 -0400 from <fredfighter@spamcop.net>:
>
> Seth Breidbart wrote:
> > In article <8quvi2devppfi2ut09k80tvap2urisldq5@4ax.com>,
> > <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
> >
> > >The last time I tried that, about 30 years ago, t
|
|
|
In article <9rd9j2tpicbsbnpjd9io4ji2j0rvpq5a3o@4ax.com>,
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>Seth Breidbart wrote:
>> In article <8quvi2devppfi2ut09k80tvap2urisldq5@4ax.com>,
>> <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>
>> >The last time I tried that, abo
|
|
|
In article <9rd9j2tpicbsbnpjd9io4ji2j0rvpq5a3o@4ax.com>,
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>Seth Breidbart wrote:
>> In article <8quvi2devppfi2ut09k80tvap2urisldq5@4ax.com>,
>> <fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>
>> >The last time I tried that,
|
|
|
In article <6rd9j2daiveulf5f9djb6kr5bmgif90ogu@4ax.com>,
Jim Prescott <jgp@seas.rochester.edu> wrote:
> A Google of
> "state constitution" atheist
> turns up
> http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/StateConstitutions.htm
> with links into the vario
|
|
|
bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
>
>A provision against atheists holding public office is on its face null
>and void because of Article VI. Very likely nobody has ever tried to
>enforce it; if they did, you may be sure that it _has_ been struck
>do
|
|
|
In article <6rd9j2daiveulf5f9djb6kr5bmgif90ogu@4ax.com>,
Jim Prescott <jgp@seas.rochester.edu> wrote:
>In article <lg94j2dudefm7954qlfsa5bro1fm91m947@4ax.com> you write:
>>Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@animato.arlington.ma.us> writes:
>>Rich Carreiro also qu
|
|
