Legal Spring Logo

"Reviewing every type of legal service"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: U.S. Federal Court Orders Spamhaus.org To Pay $11.7 Million In Damages For Illegal Blacklisting
In article <575kj2p83tsvgv7mcrlse9b555u7mne1cs@4ax.com>, Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >"Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" wrote: >> "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> said: >> >>>You didn't, in other words, commit a tort


Re: U.S. Federal Court Orders Spamhaus.org To Pay $11.7 Million In Damages For Illegal Blacklisting
Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com wrote: >> Spamhaus [...] showed up, filed to have the suit removed from >> Illinois state court to federal court and then apparently folded >> up and went home when the court didn't treat the case as >> being completely stupid. P


Re: U.S. Federal Court Orders Spamhaus.org To Pay $11.7 Million In Damages For Illegal Blacklisting
jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote: > Ignoring whatever else Spamhaus may have done, is it allowed > to remove a case to federal court and then move to dismiss > for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or improper venue? > Or does the notice of removal


Third Party Liablility
My car was damaged during a fight between a bunch hMy car was damaged during a fight between a bunch of kids. They were asked to leaving the area 3 different times, but they continued to fight. The boy who was thrown into my car says he is not liable b


Re: repairing corporate status
Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:32:13 -0400 from <herb_k@mail.com>: > A person began a new single-person Sub S corporation several months > ago, and ... paid for some things (such as internet website services) with > a personal credit card, rather than with a cor


Recording a Conversation
In the state of Illinois, is it true that I cannot record a conversation I have with a professor with a voice recorder without the consent of the professor?


Re: Proposition to Execute Spammers, Bot Builders and Script Kiddies
Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:40:06 -0400 from Dick Adams <rdadams@smart.net>: > The seceond problem you will encounter is the ACLU aka "The Legal > Defense Fund of the Klu Klux Klan, the American Nazi Party, and > all other miscreants." The ACLU will argue fr


Re: Proposition to Execute Spammers, Bot Builders and Script Kiddies
BG> The most surprising people may be spending money to defeat your BG> initiative, including banks, TV stations, newspapers, car BG> manufacturers, and even software companies like Micro$oft. Even if BG> they don't send spam now, they may think of


Re: Proposition to Execute Spammers, Bot Builders and Script Kiddies
rdadams@smart.net (Dick Adams) wrote: > Network Admin <c0@earthlink.net> wrote: >> With some of the unique propositions on the ballot this November, >> the lunchroom bull session came up with a question about >> executing spammers. > > As a Found


Re: Negligence vs Gross Negligence
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:39:58 -0400, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote: >You are right. The courts have held that you can contract away >liability for ordinary negligence (carelessness in plain English), but >not gross negligence. >. . . . Repor


Re: LLC benefits (going from Sole Proprietor)
matt@mailinator.com wrote: > i need to incorporate my sole proprietorship. i was on a > "incorporate in delaware" site today, and i read their FAQs about > LLC vs. S-Corp. it seemed pretty informative, and made me think > perhaps LLC was right for m


Re: LLC benefits (going from Sole Proprietor)
matt@mailinator.com wrote: > hello, > > i need to incorporate my sole proprietorship. i was on a "incorporate > in delaware" site today, and i read their FAQs about LLC vs. S-Corp. it > seemed pretty informative, and made me think perhaps LLC was r


Re: LLC benefits (going from Sole Proprietor)
matt@mailinator.com wrote: > > i need to incorporate my sole proprietorship. Why? Have you discussed this with your accountant? > question -- is the LLC in delaware going to have the same > benefits as the LLC in my (random) state? No. Moreo


Re: levy on a national bank
Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:39:45 -0400 from D.F. Manno <dfmanno@mail.com>: > In article <erd9j21vd3g6p948159j3rgtq67s8jfmju@4ax.com>, > "Nancy" <rancy@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > I have a judgment in a Florida county court against a national > > bank


Re: levy on a national bank
In article <j65kj215r1btnjsn6dqnlamomn0avc3h5f@4ax.com>, D.F. Manno <dommanno@yahoo.com> wrote: >In article <erd9j21vd3g6p948159j3rgtq67s8jfmju@4ax.com>, > "Nancy" <rancy@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> I have a judgment in a Florida county court aga


Re: levy on a national bank
"D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> wrote: > "Nancy" <rancy@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> I have a judgment in a Florida county court against a national >> bank. I am not an attorney. Can I have the sherrif levy on the cash >> that is at the bank to


Landlord selling our building. New owner wants to move us out.
Hello, Myself and my wife and our 2 children have lived in our Los Angeles apartment for @ 5years. Our apartment is one of three (2x 2bedrooms and 1 x 1 bedroom) I and my family live in one of the 2 bedroom apartments. 1 person lives in the other


Re: Jurisdiction question
Stan Brown wrote: > Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:46:33 -0400 from Stuart A. Bronstein > <spamtrap@lexregia.com>: >> Did you sign anything? Your credit card company (at least a US >> company) is not allowed to charge you for anything you didn't >> specific


Re: How/should I sue
Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:31:36 -0400 from David Ames <worldrecord@juno.com>: > Terry.McKenna@gmail.com wrote: > > I recently gave a negative reference for a former employee. I have > > moved on from the company a year ago and so has the employee. > > >


Re: Homeowner's Insurance
"gary" <gcotterl@co.riverside.ca.us> wrote: <Since the vehicle was in the garage that was broken-into, why wouldn't the costs of having the vehicle's door locks changed, the new keys made and for re-programming the remote-transmitter be covered by my


Re: fundraising for terrorists
Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:31:21 -0400 from Allan Adler <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu>: > I'd like to know what authority the US government had, under US law, before > 9/11/2001 to prevent groups in the US from collecting money to send to > terrorists in other


Re: Electronic withdrawal
In article <e65kj29dos4vpu364a0g6np4bhritv3bn8@4ax.com>, kanner@deadspam.com (Herbert Kanner) writes: | On two occasions, a creditor (once, a credit card bank, once the AAA for | a membership renewal) has made a direct electronic withdrawal from my


Re: Electronic withdrawal
In article <e65kj29dos4vpu364a0g6np4bhritv3bn8@4ax.com>, Herbert Kanner <kanner@deadspam.com> wrote: > On two occasions, a creditor (once, a credit card bank, once the AAA for > a membership renewal) has made a direct electronic withdrawal from my


Re: Electronic withdrawal
Herbert Kanner <kanner@deadspam.com> wrote: > On two occasions, a creditor (once, a credit card bank, once the > AAA for a membership renewal) has made a direct electronic > withdrawal from my checking account rather than depositing the > check I se


Re: Election Law Questions
Moshe Lev Zvei wrote: > A California candidate has had his office searched after > allegedly sending the following message . . . to immigrants > (perhaps) registered with the opposite political party. > . . . I am at a loss to under


Re: Election Law Questions
"Moshe Lev Zvei" <moshelevzvei@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:765kj21eejo87po90v1lf8f7ec0q8tui3b@4ax.com... >A California candidate has had his office searched > after allegedly sending the following message in > Spanish (below in English per a n


Re: Election Law Questions
Moshe Lev Zvei wrote: > "You are advised that if your residence in this > country is illegal or you are an immigrant, voting in > a federal election is a crime that could result in > jail time." > > I am at a loss to understand what crime was co


Re: Election Law Questions
Moshe Lev Zvei <moshelevzvei@yahoo.com> wrote: > A California candidate has had his office searched > after allegedly sending the following message in > Spanish (below in English per a news article) to > immigrants (perhaps) registered with the oppo


Re: atheists forbidden from holding office
Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:39:33 -0400 from Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>: > In this case, if you sue to overturn the anti-atheist clause in the > State Constitution, you would be "outing" yourself as an atheist, and > have zero chance of getting elected. Same


Re: atheists forbidden from holding office
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:39:33 -0400, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote: >. . . . >In this case, if you sue to overturn the anti-atheist clause in the >State Constitution, you would be "outing" yourself as an atheist, and >have zero chance of getting


Re: atheists forbidden from holding office
Allan Adler wrote: > JMW <epsilon_911@yahoo.com> writes: > >> And in that sense, such a state constitutional provision acts as an >> /in terrorem/ clause. > > Could you please explain what an "in terrorem clause" is? http://www.nolo.com/definit


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004