|
|
Andy asks:
Is an expired passport still valid as an identification document ?
How about an expired driver license which has a photo ?
Thanks,
Andy in Texas
|
|
|
I would like to use a phone mail received from the opposing party to be used
in the [Minnesota] conciliation court proceedings. It is in foreign language
which we both understand.
We both speak English as well, and I doubt that the other party will
|
|
|
I recently upgraded toTimeslips 2007 and around the same time one of my
clients decided to stop using Litigation Advisor and instead go back to
ordinary billing. Now they want the bill I send to have on it:
The total number of hours billed by each time
|
|
|
Can a private citizen subpoena information from a defendant in small
claims court? Any idea how hard that is to do in Arizona?
|
|
|
I'm a self employed appraiser. I received an COD order from a lender. Our
agreement with this lender is all orders are COD. The borrower understood
and paid via check at the time of inspection.
The check, which was returned due to NSF, was drawn
|
|
|
This involves a building with two apartments, one of which is
owner-occupied, in New York City.
The tenant had to post a security deposit at the time of rental (and,
just for info, no additional security was ever asked for despite rent
increases dur
|
|
|
Paul Cassel wrote:
> golf.rockz@gmail.com wrote:
>> In the state of Illinois, is it true that I cannot record a
>> conversation I have with a professor with a voice recorder without the
>> consent of the professor?
>>
> Read the statute yourself and
|
|
|
In article <pj8pj2t09vnl2ncvnflpnfceva6ijj4q0i@4ax.com>,
Rick <rickajho@rcn.com> wrote:
>You have two choices: Produce the recorder and tell the professor of
>your intent to record. He can refuse to participate. Or record the
>conversation covertly
|
|
|
Rick wrote:
>
> You have two choices: Produce the recorder and tell the professor of
> your intent to record. He can refuse to participate. Or record the
> conversation covertly and risk getting into serious trouble and have a
> piece of "evidenc
|
|
|
Gerald Scorbie <gerald@scorbie.nul.easynews.com> wrote:
>If an individual who has been convicted of a felony uses a personal website
>as a forum to boast of being in possession of rifles and pistols, does this
>constitute sufficient probable cause
|
|
|
On Oct 23, 7:11 am, Gerald Scorbie <ger...@scorbie.nul.easynews.com>
wrote:
> If an individual who has been convicted of a felony uses a personal website
> as a forum to boast of being in possession of rifles and pistols, does this
> constitute suff
|
|
|
In conciliation court [Minnessota], I've been sued by a General Partnership
(not by individuals). In my turn, acting as a third party plaintiff, I am
suing it back, as well as all three of its three partners.
In theory, each of them is responsible
|
|
|
handyman@no-email.centralpets.com wrote:
> A local farmer who owns several thousand arces in the area has had a
> logging company loggings all of his wooded areas.
[Loggers mistakenly cut down 4 of OP's trees along with his neighbor's]
You run a f
|
|
|
<handyman@no-email.centralpets.com> wrote:
[Loggers cut down 4 trees on OP's property. They had a map showing
the property boundary, but didn't consult it before cutting. The
logging company has offered to pay $100 as the "value" of the logs.
>
|
|
|
On Oct 23, 7:11 am, handy...@no-email.centralpets.com wrote:
[OP's 4 trees were cut down, purportedly by mistake, by loggers engaged
by his neighbor. The loggers offered him $100 for the lot. He thinks
they are worth more.]
> Obviously they can
|
|
|
In article <ij8pj2dd5ali93a4r59373lbl5rjmp510v@4ax.com>,
<handyman@no-email.centralpets.com> wrote:
>Obviously they can not replace those trees.
That's not obvious to everybody. There have been a few instances
recently in my area where a property
|
|
|
In article <ij8pj2dd5ali93a4r59373lbl5rjmp510v@4ax.com>,
handyman@no-email.centralpets.com wrote:
> What are my legal rights?
> How do I proceed? Please give me some help, I am at a complete loss.
> (particularly lawyers).
This is a small claim
|
|
|
Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:11:15 -0400 from <Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com>:
> Stan Brown wrote, in part:
> > [B]anks routinely have *far* less cash on hand than the
> > total of deposits.
>
> For those not familiar with the concept of a "fractional reserve"
> s
|
|
|
Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:11:09 -0400 from D.F. Manno <dfmanno@mail.com>:
> You seem to be saying that once I deposit money in a bank, the
> money belongs to the _bank_, and creditors can take it to satisfy
> claims against the bank. I disagree.
You're f
|
|
|
In article <ej8pj2p1rslh6dh7cl6f2btlqn875c17r2@4ax.com>,
D.F. Manno <dommanno@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <9apmj2hr3nrolroiqr1dbosbohqehoaotd@4ax.com>,
> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:39:45 -0400 from D.F. Man
|
|
|
In article <dj8pj291nqd096k43fn8v7pdumi1aq5h2m@4ax.com>,
Nancy <rancy@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> You make sense Seth, since the bank is required to maintain a cash
>reserve that would have to be the bank's money. Have you ever heard of
>a Sheriff e
|
|
|
> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> I respectfully disagree. The cash is an asset of the bank. What is
>> owed to depositors is a liability of the bank, and the two are
>> different.
>
D.F. Manno <dommanno@yahoo.com> wrote:
>You se
|
|
|
On Oct 23, 7:11 am, "D.F. Manno" <dfma...@mail.com> wrote:
> > > That cash belongs to the depositors. You can not levy on that money.
>
> > I respectfully disagree. The cash is an asset of the bank. What is
> > owed to depositors is a liability of t
|
|
|
"D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> wrote:
> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> I respectfully disagree. The cash is an asset of the bank. What
>> is owed to depositors is a liability of the bank, and the two are
>> different.
>
> Yo
|
|
|
In article <9j8pj21skeartdqo86cu2011es11ndnv3s@4ax.com>,
wuffa <magewuffa@gmail.com> wrote:
>If you rent month to month you get 30 days. also even with a lease most
>state let the landlord(s) move people out there going to use the apt
>for there own
|
|
|
In article <3j8pj21jk88tfq1dr2s2tt2644av3s1kf8@4ax.com>,
John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com> wrote:
>So, if you are 3 months into a year, lease, you should
>have 9 months. If you are at the end of a lease, or
>on a month to month, then you can b
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> and if the new owner
> gives you timely notice that he will not renew your lease and that he
> intends to move into your apt. when your lease expires, there's
> probably not much you can do legally to prev
|
|
|
I was an employee at a company who entered into contract with another
company. My individual contract was negotiated by my manager and I
signed it. Later, it was proved that the other company breached the
contracts and caused us damage. Now my manag
|
|
|
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:38:21 -0400, "Daniel R. Reitman"
<dreitman@spiritone.com> wrote:
>If OP is in Florida, it is likely that there are lawyers available
>who have sued the Cuban government or some of the military governments
>from Central Americ
|
|
|
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:03:18 -0400, Terry.McKenna@gmail.com wrote:
>I recently gave a negative reference for a former employee. I have
>moved on from the company a year ago and so has the employee.
>
>I was contacted by a recruiter asking for refere
|
|
|
In article <0j8pj21j5t3dter3e3k03ohil8htce0dqe@4ax.com>,
Allan Adler <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>So Congress could pass a law saying that money can't be sent to a particular
>terrorist organization. OK. Congress could also pass a law authori
|
|
|
I was sick for three days and my employer did not pay me for those
days. I live in Michigan. Can I get compensated for this time off in
any way? Can I apply for FMLA and collect unemployment? Atleast can I
get some tax related benefits for this and oth
|
|
|
In article <ui8pj21n9i7nv5phfvu7o4604akguf6q42@4ax.com>,
David Martel <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Stuart,
>
>> Legal immigrants are allowed to vote.
>
> I don't believe that non-citizens are allowed to vote, regardless of
>their immigration
|
|
|
OLD DAHD <hopyard@verizon.net> wrote:
>Legal immigrants are not allowed to vote unless they are naturalized
>citizens. Further, it is a very dubious argument that naturalized citizens
>(by and large) are unaware of their rights and obligations, and h
|
|
|
"David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Stuart,
>
>> Legal immigrants are allowed to vote.
>
> I don't believe that non-citizens are allowed to vote,
> regardless of their immigration status.
You're right, of course. Sloppy language o
|
|
|
Does someone have knowledge of righting a wrong without
going to the time and expense of a trial? This was my first encounter
with the criminal legal system, and on the whole, IMO, it's corrupt!
Specifically, I was indicted because my detractors (ne
|
|
|
IF there are 3 parnters all owning 1/3 equally in a corporation - can
two band together to get rid of the third? There are no shareholders
just the three partners. Is there a buy-out or someting that has to
happen?
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:09:52 -0400,
mountainview_2006@yahoo.com wrote:
>I had filed a case in California state court against the company for
>wrongful termination (age discrimination). Before going to trial in
>State
|
|
|
>Allan Adler wrote:
>> Could you please explain what an "in terrorem clause" is?
Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/Term/E532EF64-1CB1-4D65-A2C1400DE1A8746E/alpha/I/
>
>"Latin meaning "in fear." Thi
|
|
|
>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:39:33 -0400 from Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>:
>> In this case, if you sue to overturn the anti-atheist clause in the
>> State Constitution, you would be "outing" yourself as an atheist, and
>> have zero chance of getting elected. S
|
|
|
John F. Carr wrote:
> In article <gg94j2dli9di57jm2vj5gfgpaj55p0dtrv@4ax.com>,
> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:48:11 -0400 from John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu>:
>>> Personally, I
>>> would prefer the courts follow
|
|
|
>Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>You can't be serious.
>>
>>Allow states to set up legally established religions?
John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu> wrote:
>If you want to ban that _and nothing less_ that's fine.
>The legal regime we hav
|
|
|
Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
[commenting on a news article about a man trying to get alimony
canceled because his ex-wife had a sex change and is now male.]
>This brings to mind an interesting question: if a man has sex-chan
|
|
|
==========================================================
Oral argument previews:
Prepared by the liibulletin editorial board:
< http://www.law.cornell.edu/bulletin/board_current.htm >
=====================================================
|
|
