|
|
"Mike S." <littleboyblu87@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>The person violated a few local zoning laws and had to go to court for
>it. The judge decided that the county would go on the man's property
>and fix/clean up the violations since the man failed to do so
|
|
|
Mike S. wrote:
> The man received a copy of the official court order that stated the
> county would clean up the violations on the property on a specific
> date. Nowhere in the court order did it say anything about those
> building materials the judge
|
|
|
Mike,
As I understand it your friend was represented by a court appointed
attorney when he answered to charges of keeping a "messy" home lot. The
court decided that the county would dispatch workers to clean up the
property but that some build
|
|
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:16:01 -0400 from Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2
@comremovecast.net>:
> Here, one can question the value of each document. If used as an address
> verification, an expired driver's license is questionable. If used as a
> citizenship
|
|
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:15:58 -0400 from Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com>:
> I know (from actual experience) that an expired passport isn't valid
> for ID in New York and New Jersey. I believe that an expired drivers
> license is probably not valid for ID
|
|
|
In article <0i91k2dloqq6p2eg47mcii7od311pg7lvf@4ax.com>,
Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is an expired passport still valid as an identification document ?
>>
>> How about an expired driver license which has a photo ?
>
>I know (from a
|
|
|
AndyS wrote:
> Is an expired passport still valid as an identification document ?
The federal form I-9 (the one that has insured that no illegal aliens
have worked in the US since 1986, but that's another story,
http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/fo
|
|
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:15:48 -0400 from <minormaybe@gmail.com>:
> During the period of January-April 2004, my employer (in California)
> overpaid me. In January 2005, they wrote to me asking me to repay the
> amount I was overpaid. I sent them a check wi
|
|
|
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, minormaybe@gmail.com wrote:
>During the period of January-April 2004, my employer (in California)
>overpaid me. In January 2005, they wrote to me asking me to repay
>the amount I was overpaid. I sent them a check within a month o
|
|
|
minormaybe@gmail.com wrote:
> During the period of January-April 2004, my employer (in
> California) overpaid me. In January 2005, they wrote to me asking
> me to repay the amount I was overpaid. I sent them a check within
> a month or so, which the
|
|
|
Chuck <sendmespam@thevolleyball.net> wrote:
[OP, a self-employed appraiser, was given an NSF check by a would-be
borrower. The property was owned by a married couple. The loan (and
appraisal) was requested by the wife, the check was drawn on the
hus
|
|
|
Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>This involves a building with two apartments, one of which is
>owner-occupied, in New York City.
[OP asks about the security deposit, paid at the beginning of a 15
year tenancy. Building was sold during the tena
|
|
|
Paul Cassel wrote:
> Mike Anderson wrote:
>
>>> 720 Ill. Compiled Stat. Ann. 5/14-1, -2: An eavesdropping device cannot
>>> be used to record or overhear a conversation without the consent of all
>>> parties to the conversation under criminal stat
|
|
|
<handyman@no-email.centralpets.com> wrote in message
news:ij8pj2dd5ali93a4r59373lbl5rjmp510v@4ax.com...
> Anyhow, the loggers said they would stop until there was proof of
> ownership. I pointed out the survey markers to them, and I went back
>
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
handy...@no-email.centralpets.com wrote:
>> A local farmer who owns several thousand arces in the area has had a
>> logging company loggings all of his wooded areas.
>[Loggers mistakenly cut down 4 of OP's trees along with his n
|
|
|
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>[OP's 4 trees were cut down, purportedly by mistake, by loggers engaged
>by his neighbor. The loggers offered him $100 for the lot. He thinks
>they are worth more.]
>
>> Obviously they can not repl
|
|
|
[Loggers cut down 4 trees on OP's property. They had a map showing
the property boundary, but didn't consult it before cutting. The
logging company has offered to pay $100 as the "value" of the logs.]
You will want some one to look into your
|
|
|
In article <gh91k2107lo6oo8gq3iukl4kp457lgbk8e@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:09:37 -0400 from Philip M. Brewer
><pbrewer@bluestem.prairienet.org>:
>> Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:09:37 -0400 from Philip M. Brewer
> <pbrewer@bluestem.prairienet.org>:
>> Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> and if the new owner
>>> gives you timely notice that he will not renew your lease an
|
|
|
In article <6jkuj2piuvvn1rfqd2cjpvuovmbjjg59u8@4ax.com>,
Philip M. Brewer <pbrewer@bluestem.prairienet.org> wrote:
>Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> and if the new owner
>> gives you timely notice that he will not renew your lease and t
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:09:37 -0400 from Philip M. Brewer
> > Probably not relevant to the original poster, but a detail I was curious
> > about: Can the new landlord give you effective notice before the
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Philip M. Brewer <pbrewer@bluestem.prairienet.org>:
>
>> Probably not relevant to the original poster, but a detail I was
>> curious about: Can the new landlord give you effective notice
>> before the
|
|
|
Short story:
Joe says a friend of his, Bob, opened a line of credit under his own
name but using Joe's name and SSN as co-signer. Joe did not know or
consent to this. Since Bob perpetrated this identity fraud on-line,
neither Bob's or Joe's signa
|
|
|
If a company has created a software package, can a third party sell
training services for that software package if the company that owns
the software does not authorize the third party as a trainer? The
company also sells training and the third party
|
|
|
jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) writes:
> The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
> is the source of the ban on support of designated foreign
> terrorist organizations.[snip]
> The Patriot Act expanded the list of prohibited activities
|
|
|
AM wrote:
> I was sick for three days and my employer did not pay me for those
> days. I live in Michigan. Can I get compensated for this time off in
> any way? Can I apply for FMLA
This only guarantees UN-paid leave and a job when you are well aga
|
|
|
<The.Screaming.Hemorrhoid@gmail.com> wrote:
>We have a class project reviewing what is acceptable and unacceptable
>political advertisements.
>
>There are several aspects including Verifyiability and Factuality of
>claims, Messaging, Catchy-ness and
|
|
|
On 2006-10-26 08:14:17 -0400, "Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> said:
> ... Just remember that if your reputation matters to you more than the
> money (exp. if
> your neighbors are "judgment proof" losers as I guess they might be)
> you're going
|
|
|
Fairseeker <fairseeker@comcast.com> wrote again:
>Does someone have knowledge of righting a wrong without
>going to the time and expense of a trial?
Yes. Depending on the facts and particular relationships at issue.
Its a basic if not always for
|
|
|
John F. Carr wrote, in part:
>> [...] The legal regime we have now encourages lawsuits
>> over stuff like whether a city named "The Crosses" can
>> have crosses in the city seal.
Barry Gold wrote, in part:
> It wasn't a city named "The Crosses" (or
|
|
|
In article <bg94j253d81fplkqspnv0tn7ttgl7jla6o@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Restricting where you get your checks is probably an illegal tying
>arrangement outlawed by the antitrust laws.
>
>"A tying arrangement is
|
|
|
In article <cikuj297cd5c21qf994gkcila7tcr9k8et@4ax.com>,
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>Some states take the view that a person's sex is determined by how
>they normally live, dress, and act. This is important because many
>states have a law agai
|
|