|
|
<pw59qtz8@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I am thinking about trying some romance novel writing
> and am concerned that once my product is out there I might be sued
> for using the plot ideas or characters of someone else. Are there
> guidelines as to
|
|
|
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:24:28 -0500, <pw59qtz8@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I am thinking about trying some romance novel writing
>and am concerned that once my product is out there I might be sued for
>using the plot ideas or characters of someone els
|
|
|
Ian Michael Gumby <im_gumbyN0Spam@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Based on a comment made by Steve Linford in a post to
> news.admin.net-abuse.email, he said something which lead me to
> believe that there was more to this than just a jurisdiction
> issue.
|
|
|
A sub S corporation is formed in DE, by a resident of DE. The business
will manufacture a product in DE, to be sold via the internet, and to
be shipped to customers in any state from DE.
If I, living in PA, were to become a 50% shareholder, a board m
|
|
|
Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:23:55 -0500 from Seth Breidbart
<sethb@panix.com>:
> In article <vq69k2lk6itps6s4h8b84e8h627chn4d0j@4ax.com>,
> Alan <alanb_lano2spam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Is there a federal law, requirement, regulations, etc. for someone
> > to
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:ugrbk25dr6uu92be9kj1tsui2b6j67m55q@4ax.com...
> In article <vq69k2lk6itps6s4h8b84e8h627chn4d0j@4ax.com>,
> Alan <alanb_lano2spam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Is there a federal law, requirement, regul
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Alan <alanb_lano2spam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Is there a federal law, requirement, regulations, etc. for someone
>>to remove you from their mailing list if you make a formal request
>>for them to do so?
>
>
|
|
|
"Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> "rick wintomac" <c308682@gmail.com> wrote
>> In a community property state, when the surviving spouse's IRA
>> was purchased with community funds, then does half of the
>> *surviving spouse's* IRA get added to
|
|
|
jfalsone@udsmr.org wrote:
> If a company has created a software package, can a third party sell
> training services for that software package if the company that owns
> the software does not authorize the third party as a trainer? The
> company als
|
|
|
In article <dgrbk2hi6ddl4tsr3r9m15orfqlsneh34o@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>> Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>
>>>If the third party was not an authorized tr
|
|
|
> Never give a reference for a former employee. You can be sued by the
> former employee for libel or slander.
I developed the following technique to get a little real information
from a previous employer. It almost always worked:
Call the for
|
|
|
In article <bti6k29gbs60pqd6i16baehhrm64k65k35@4ax.com>,
Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@animato.arlington.ma.us> wrote:
>bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) writes:
>
>> The first amendment of the Constitution protects _speech_. It doesn't
>> say anything about poli
|
|
|
Stan,
You give us a "history" of job market conditions for electrical engineers
in the early 1970s You then tell us a story in which a company sends out a
letter in which it attempts to halt rumors of impending layoffs by denying
that layoffs
|
|
|
In article <8grbk2tmgu1v1gbtd9jpf7nh3b40qfohpg@4ax.com>,
"Stan" <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 6. Now, here's where I'm wondering if courts, etc., today, in 2006,
> would rule that a promise of employment was in fact created. On
> October 16, 1
|
|
|
Mark wrote:
> Quick Summary: Dealer lied about credit score - said it was 690 and is
> actually 735. Payments are 20 bucks more than should be. Out of
> principle, I"m taking it to the Dept. of Consumer Affairs and Attorney
> General's Office.
>
|
|
|
In article <6grbk25bbo3at5oksufhl5loior5mj2bu3@4ax.com>,
"Mark" <millermarkl@gmail.com> wrote:
> Quick Summary: Dealer lied about credit score - said it was 690 and is
> actually 735. Payments are 20 bucks more than should be. Out of
> principle
|
|
|
I've sold my car about 6 months ago. Now the ex girlfriend of the guy I
sold it to tells me that the person I sold it to never registered the
car in his name, the title is lost, and would I please help by applying
for a duplicate title.
I would love n
|
|
|
[OP has a 1/3 interest in a corporation? partnership? and wants out.]
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>If you are in fact a shareholder in a corporation and have no other
>involvement in it, such as being employed by it or holding a positio
|
|
|
"John F. Carr" <jfc@mit.edu> wrote in message
news:ufrbk2p37dcam9i1v788kq53a90oee7714@4ax.com...
> The "evolution sticker" case rather than Dover convinced me that
> existing Establishment Clause doctrine must be overturned, by
> complete abolition
|
|
|
Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:21:38 -0500 from John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu>:
> http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/01/13/evolution.textbooks.ruling/
>
> A Georgia school put stickers on textbooks asking students
> to approach the material with an open mind.
I hesitat
|
|
|
jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
> The "evolution sticker" case rather than Dover convinced me that
> existing Establishment Clause doctrine must be overturned, by
> complete abolition of the clause as applied to states if lawyers
> are unable to
|
|
|
>jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
>> I'm not even talking about "intelligent design" and the
>> newly-invented constitutional right of children to study
>> science. Judges are ruling that asking students to think
>> critically about evolution is the
|
|
|
>Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>>In fact, you should read that last, first. The key point about any
>>theory in _Science_ is that there exists a way of proving it false.
>>You can say, "you can perform this experiment, and if it comes out
>>any w
|
|
