|
|
> So you must have a lease. Generally you are responsible for full rent
> to the end of the lease period, even if you give notice you are
> leaving.
>
> They are required to look for a replacement. But you are responsible
> for their costs plus ren
|
|
|
In article <3l3hk295osl48pvet0gnlstbrfh7ie0dts@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
>> http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=u
>> s&vol=397&invol=72
|
|
|
On Nov 10, 6:57 am, Mike Anderson <prabb...@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
> Why would a professional negligence policy be different? Not disputing
> you and saying it isn't (if you say it's different, I'll definitely take
> your word for it) but wondering
|
|
|
Stan wrote:
> ed wrote:
> > A Michigan Attorney wrote:
> > > On Nov 5, 7:14 am, "ed" <edcos...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Ed,
>
> You got your answer. The problem is that it's not the answer you want
> to hear. THE answer is that Medicare is seconda
|
|
|
While trying to catch the 4:00 news, I wound up with Judge Judy for a
couple of minutes. A young man whose DL was suspended drove a young
woman who had been drinking, and on his way back to the party he
wrecked her car. (I believe the man was from Re
|
|
|
On Nov 10, 6:56 am, "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamt...@lexregia.com>
wrote:
> Even if you nominally bought the car "as is" the fact that they showed
> you a Carfax report that was incorrect could be considered a warranty
> of description, for which the
|
|
|
"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in message
news:15q8l2dsseqoru3l21nk17t22cbldpjl9q@4ax.com...
> Even if you nominally bought the car "as is" the fact that they showed
> you a Carfax report that was incorrect could be considered a w
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>
>>
>> Mechanical inspection didn't reveal this when I bought the car and
>> the car was purchased "as-is." I believe my car was purchased
>> (probably indirectly) by the dealership from a rental car company.
>
> Even i
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
> "Fritz M" <nospam@masoner.net> wrote:
>
>> In 2005 I bought a used car from The Cowboy Corral car dealership
>> in Frederick, Colorado. The dealership showed me the car had a
>> clean title with a report from Carfax befo
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
[replying to my comment about the corporation speaking for its
shareholders]
>I understand your point. But does a corporation that sells pizza
>really have a fiduciary duty to oppose abortio
|
|
|
>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>> So you're objecting to wealthy persons (in the legal sense) having
>> freedom of speech?
>
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Not at all. What I object to is someone (wealthy or not) havin
|
|
|
In article <q4q8l29f9to7amhqmd2joi9ee3apvoevj6@4ax.com>,
<rexdtripod@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Got a buddy with a divorce decree clearly awarding a marital home to
>him but his ex wife won't cooperate by signing the quit claim. What
>are his optioins?
>
|
|
|
on 11/10/2006 3:56 AM rexdtripod@hotmail.com said the following:
> Got a buddy with a divorce decree clearly awarding a marital home to
> him but his ex wife won't cooperate by signing the quit claim. What
> are his optioins?
>
You don't say wher
|
|
|
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:56:19 -0500, rexdtripod@hotmail.com wrote:
>. . . .
>The court decreed that his ex must sign a quit claim within 60 days,
>but she refuses and it seems his only options are lengthy legal fights.
> He's spoken to lawers about
|
|
|
> Got a buddy with a divorce decree clearly awarding a marital home to
> him but his ex wife won't cooperate by signing the quit claim. What
> are his optioins?
First thing I'd try is call the county courthouse and see if the divorce
decree is suf
|
|
|
rexdtripod@hotmail.com wrote:
> Got a buddy with a divorce decree clearly awarding a marital home
> to him but his ex wife won't cooperate by signing the quit claim.
> What are his optioins?
I had the same problem with a client. I went back to c
|
|
|
In article <n4q8l2ltvsibd472su2ekhgu7s389uda0d@4ax.com>,
John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
> > We have an accepted offer on a house. Had the home inspection done,
> > which brought up some defects. Submitted an amendment to the sellers
> > re
|
|
