|
|
Ludmilla's original post asked for: ". . .some decent softwares or
websites that have forms and information . . .
on 11/17/2006 4:19 AM Ludmillia The Great said the following:
> John Hyde wrote:
>> [Snarky comments deleted]
>>
>> JH
>
> The
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
> "ed" <edcosoft@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > You really don't need a sucessor trustee if you can get the
> > funds, or stock with some other method, such as:
>
>From both a legal and a practical stand this information i
|
|
|
Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:19:45 -0500 from <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com>:
>
> ronnirubin@sprintmail.com wrote:
>
> Please consider "realtor" replaced by "Realtor" in the above message.
>
> * Realtor is a registered trademark of the National Association
|
|
|
Hi everone,
One lives in an apartment for 3 years with his wife and a kid. No delay
in monthly payments or such things at all.
By end of the 3rd year, landlord sent a letter to the tenant asking him
to evacuate in 30 days! They go to court; the ju
|
|
|
horkl asked:
>> How do you request a Prayer For Judgment? Can you request one
>> over the phone instead of going to court?
[John Hyde explained the purpose of a Prayer for Relief in a
complaint.]
Alternatively and nonexclusively, OP:
(1) might
|
|
|
Hypothetical question.
Are there any legal issues for an ISP/Telco monitoring the IP traffic on
their networks?
In a TCP/IP packet you have a "shell" of information that identifies the
packet. Basically, who sent the packet, where the packet is go
|
|
|
"jude" <dubllgully@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In laws want the family farm to stay as a family farm.
> FIL was given the farm by his father, who was given it by his
> father. But they don't want to leave it to just one child because
> the value of the re
|
|
|
jude,
Your family is debating the inheritance of the "family farm". The
patriarch is rather ill so a decision needs to be made soon. No one is
currently a farmer or has an interest in farming. The land itself is a large
portion of the estate.
|
|
|
"Chris" <cg22165@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vs9rl2poc4bqe7hi3k1tbaef9urnbhb5uq@4ax.com...
> So, I and my family had reservations at a Best Western in Ashland,
> Oregon that had been made some months prior. It was for a specific
> room that was
|
|
|
In article <vs9rl2poc4bqe7hi3k1tbaef9urnbhb5uq@4ax.com>,
"Chris" <cg22165@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It is a bit late now, but what would have been my options legally and
> what kind of compensation would I be entitled to?
It would be classy for the hot
|
|
|
Chris wrote:
> So, I and my family had reservations at a Best Western in Ashland,
> Oregon that had been made some months prior. It was for a specific
> room that was different/better than all the rest, but I can't recall
> what they called it. When
|
|
|
Paraphrasing OP, Chris: [The Ashland, OR Best Western ("Ashland BW")
gave our reserved room to someone else in a particularly embarrassing
manner. We're mad. What can we do/could we have done differently?]
Apologies if "we're mad" sounds glib; OP's o
|
|
|
In article <ds9rl2t882ckh12np4u9us2h0up3kc5mdd@4ax.com>,
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>Generally speaking, *no*, you have not signed away your 4th amendment
>rights. In fact, you _cannot_ sign away that right, it is considered
>a "fundamental"
|
|
|
on 11/17/2006 4:18 AM Ernie Klein said the following:
> In article <5enol2lncj68e03jn4vjm78s5l09lki1g8@4ax.com>,
> "sue h." <sue.himmelrich@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Is it true that I've forfeited my 4th amendment rights at Costco?
>> If it's not
|
|
|
on 11/17/2006 4:18 AM Barry Gold said the following:
> sue h. <sue.himmelrich@gmail.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>> Costco Membership Agreement which states (verbatim):
>> "9. General Policies ... To ensure that all members are correctly charged
>> for t
|
|
|
On 17 Nov 2006, Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote:
> * * * In California, and probably other states,
> you have the absolute right to ignore exit checks
> in general and keep on walking as I always do in
>stores like Fry's.
W
|
|
|
shishiqiushi@teresias.net wrote:
> "sue h." <sue.himmelrich@gmail.com> wrote:
> In addition, even if you had not made that agreement, state statutory
> and decisional law near uniformly in effect throughout the country
> provides for what has commonly
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:19:36 -0500, everyone wrote:
> You didn't sign away your 4th Amendment rights against Costco because
> you never had a 4th Amendment right against Costco.
Oh my! I now understand. I do now understand that my "rights" goverene
|
|
|
In late 2004 and early 2005 we did some work for a long-time client.
Our client paid us for the work we did and then shortly thereafter the
client filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
This week we received a letter from the firm's creditor trustee
advis
|
|
|
In article <tr9rl2pq1iehdarjskueb9vgtva3sleksm@4ax.com>, mjacobslaw@gmail.com
(Mike Jacobs) writes:
| Right. Although look carefully at the "FOB" delivery terms, if any,
| in the contract. If the terms specify that the product was delivered
|
|
|
|
on 11/17/2006 4:16 AM In his closing argument to the court Stan said the
following:
> fari...@gmail.com:
>> I was the last car, Car #3, in a set of three involved in an accident
>> on a state highway in Massachusetts.
>
> ......
>
>> It is my
|
|
|
In article <pr9rl2t52dqdlhreli1m8uo8uqncbm9mng@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>fari...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I was following car #1 in the left hand lane, and leaving at least 2
>> car lengths in front of me, car #2 proceeds to cut
|
|
|
<faria72@gmail.com> wrote:
>I was the last car, Car #3, in a set of three involved in an accident
>on a state highway in Massachusetts.
>
>The speed limit is 55 however we were all doing under the speed limit
>due to morning rush hour traffic.
>
>
|
|
