|
|
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:17:32 -0500, Steve wrote:
> The owner of the house next door to me died last spring. His widow,
> who has had some difficulty coping (and may also have some addiction
> problems) decided she couldn't stay in the house and move
|
|
|
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:38:58 -0500, ozymandias wrote:
> Who can I complain to about a possible rip-off by ISP provider
> ,"NETZERO".
>
> I sign up with their service in sept 2004 at a rate of 5/6.99 a month.
> Under that plan you had to stay on at
|
|
|
John Hyde wrote:
> It troubles me that you feel that you need to be "armed" to go to the
> lawyers office. I assume you mean "informed" but wonder if your choice
> of words is telling? Part of the responsibility of the lawyer is to
> help the clie
|
|
|
"ed" <edcosoft@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Stu: All assuming the trustee cannot be found, and there are no
> other provisions for election of a succesor trustee in the trust
> or state statutes, and ignoring how you deem the term
> "legitimately", I
|
|
|
Sat, 18 Nov 2006 07:28:43 -0500 from Mike <mas_it_2000@yahoo.com>:
> One lives in an apartment for 3 years with his wife and a kid. No delay
> in monthly payments or such things at all.
>
> By end of the 3rd year, landlord sent a letter to the tenant
|
|
|
In article <p0vtl2l52v04umisnmbsfpu2cqa2fv396q@4ax.com>,
"Mike" <mas_it_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Judge gives the tenant 30 days to evacuate. Is this fair? What should
> the tenant do to push the evacuation date few more months?
No one ever promis
|
|
|
Greetings everyone. I noticed I couldn't find public domain editions
of Black's Law Dictionary 1st Edition (published in 1891) or Black's
Law Dictionary 2nd Edition (published in 1910) on Google Books or any
other places online where you would expect
|
|
|
Ian Michael Gumby wrote:
> Hypothetical question.
> Are there any legal issues for an ISP/Telco monitoring the IP traffic on
> their networks?
>
> ...
>
> Suppose an ISP/Telco wanted to monitor all of the packets sent by a specific
> PC or set
|
|
|
In article <m0vtl2t6g8gkhe9giths0lv5nn40b7skc0@4ax.com>,
Ian Michael Gumby <im_gumbyN0Spam@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Are there any legal issues for an ISP/Telco monitoring the IP traffic on
> their networks?
> Suppose an ISP/Telco wanted to monitor
|
|
|
In order to avoid probate, is it possible to have 2 living revokable
trusts rather than 1 living revokable trust + some personally owned
items with a will? I guess no matter what, there may be something
owned personally which requires a will and prob
|
|
|
Who can I complain to about a possible rip-off by ISP provider
,"NETZERO".
I sign up with their service in sept 2004 at a rate of 5/6.99 a month.
Under that plan you had to stay on at least a year to avoid an early
withdraw fee. I've been on that
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
--- snip ---
>
> Why don't they just leave it in trust for the family for the limit of
> the rule against perpetuities (about 100 years if properly drafted)?
> They can't guarantee it won't ever be sold, but they can tie
|
|
|
David Martel wrote:
..... snip ....
> Stop thinking of this as "the family farm". ...
> Sorry, I think that this is an awful plan.
>
> Good luck,
> Dave M.
Thanks, Dave. I agree. FIL is 87 years old, has never lived anywhere
except on
|
|
|
"Jonathan Biggar" <jon@floorboard.com> wrote in message
news:e0vtl2t85figss6kkb9oqcde2s4djm4a50@4ax.com...
>> It is a bit late now, but what would have been my options legally and
>> what kind of compensation would I be entitled to?
>
> You probably
|
|
|
In article <20vtl291jtn11gbqpmde1l651j7qtd76q6@4ax.com>,
"sue h." <sue.himmelrich@gmail.com> wrote:
[Long story snipped]
>"To ensure that all members are
> correctly charged for the merchandise purchased, all receipts and
> merchandise will be i
|
|
|
"David Chesler" <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> ... near uniformly in effect throughout the country
>> [the law recognizes] a "shopkeeper privilege" -
>> namely, that retailer[s] are insulated from "wrongful
>> arrest" and . . . related liabil
|
|
|
In article <60vtl2he13glmuo5l23ai0ak8ckslhrfc0@4ax.com>, nospam@isp.com
wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2006, Ernie Klein <ecklein@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > * * * In California, and probably other states,
> > you have the absolute right to ignore e
|
|
|
"sue h." <sue.himmelrich@gmail.com> wrote:
> everyone wrote:
>> You didn't sign away your 4th Amendment rights against Costco
>> because you never had a 4th Amendment right against Costco.
>
> The next logical quest becomes "Did I really AGREE to
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 07:27:44 -0500, "sue h."
<sue.himmelrich@gmail.com> wrote:
>Oh my! I now understand. I do now understand that my "rights" goverened by
>California Law and the "Costco Membership Agreement" than by the
>Constitution.
>
>The nex
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 07:27:59 -0500, John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net>
wrote:
>on 11/17/2006 4:18 AM Ernie Klein said the following:
>> In California, and probably other states, you have the absolute right to
>> ignore exit checks in general and keep
|
|
|
In article <20vtl291jtn11gbqpmde1l651j7qtd76q6@4ax.com>,
"sue h." <sue.himmelrich@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:19:36 -0500, everyone wrote:
> > You didn't sign away your 4th Amendment rights against Costco because
> > you never had a
|
|
|
andrewt@japanpacific.com wrote:
> In late 2004 and early 2005 we did some work for a long-time
> client. Our client paid us for the work we did and then shortly
> thereafter the client filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
>
> This week we received a l
|
|
|
ddl@danlan.*com (Dan Lanciani) wrote:
> What happens if the terms are FOB the seller's dock but the
> problem clearly has nothing to do with damage that occurred
> enroute from the seller's dock to the buyer's location (and thus
> the shipping insur
|
|
|
In article <qvutl2p000gggecrkc7607srcrc2ojhuq6@4ax.com>,
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>First of all, last I looked MA was a "no fault" state. That means
>you are responsible for insuring your own car against damage. If you
>don't, you are out o
|
|
