|
|
'Captain' Kirk DeHaan wrote:
> John said the following on 9/26/2006 4:29 AM:
> > I dont know if its worth wasting my time fighting DirecTV but I think
> > they
> > did something wrong and I'm sure other people are victim of this
> > problem
> > so I
|
|
|
Mark wrote:
> Quick Summary: Dealer lied about credit score - said it was 690 and is
> actually 735. Payments are 20 bucks more than should be. Out of
> principle, I"m taking it to the Dept. of Consumer Affairs and Attorney
> General's Office.
>
|
|
|
In article <u0vtl2dgg0omk3o9q0ks8okoc8m544tua0@4ax.com>,
John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
> > The problem with going to the lawyer unarmed is that there are certain
> > facts and decisions that have to be provided by the client. For
> > examp
|
|
|
Joe Lauton wrote:
> One can not shout fire in a theater etc.
>
> Is there any speech that has now become unlawful such as the "n" or
> "f" or other hate words?
>
> It may be in bad taste and not the thing to do - but is it unlawful in
> this coun
|
|
|
Joe Lauton wrote:
> One can not shout fire in a theater etc.
They can arrest you for reckless endangerment afterwards if it turns
out you were just joshing, but if there actually IS a fire in the
crowded theater, it's not a crime to say so. And th
|
|
|
In article <hcj8m2dt6mu2j5aplgk2pv4sqjnkblui6p@4ax.com>,
Joe Lauton <JL@Lauton2000.com> wrote:
>One can not shout fire in a theater etc.
>
>Is there any speech that has now become unlawful such as the "n" or
>"f" or other hate words?
Under some c
|
|
|
On Nov 22, 8:19 am, Joe Lauton <J...@Lauton2000.com> wrote:
> One can not shout fire in a theater etc.
Not quite true. One cannot FALSELY shout "fire" in a crowded theater.
Shouting it truthfully is fine. Big difference.
> Is there any speech
|
|
|
on 11/22/2006 5:19 AM Seth Breidbart said the following:
> In article <r0pjk2h9tofmi366ce3e8l34nmjduc6t8j@4ax.com>,
> Ian Michael Gumby <im_gumbyN0Spam@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in message
>> news:2jf
|
|
|
In article <2jg3l29guu4sii0l51jneg9dc71dtjeqc1@4ax.com>,
Ian Michael Gumby <im_gumbyN0Spam@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote in message
>news:2jfek257o6lmd0uqsbukbfc87opr2s57m8@4ax.com...
>> Ian Michael Gumby <
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>
> I'd be interested to know if that works. Is there a state law that
> permits that?
>
> In any case, going into court to appoint a successor trustee may be
> faster, easier and cheaper than getting a bond - if you ca
|
|
|
In article <9cj8m2tj65v31rsrd3itdr98f33fbgnhqo@4ax.com>,
Music Laws <frikker@gmail.com> wrote:
>This may be an obvious question to those who know more about the
>subject, but I am having a hard time finding a direct answer.
>
>If I buy a CD and lend
|
|
|
"Music Laws" <frikker@gmail.com> writes:
> This may be an obvious question to those who know more about the
> subject, but I am having a hard time finding a direct answer.
>
> If I buy a CD and lend it to a friend to listen to, this is not
> illeg
|
|
|
"Music Laws" <frikker@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9cj8m2tj65v31rsrd3itdr98f33fbgnhqo@4ax.com...
> This may be an obvious question to those who know more about the
> subject, but I am having a hard time finding a direct answer.
>
> If I buy a CD
|
|
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:18:54 -0500 from Music Laws <frikker@gmail.com>:
> This may be an obvious question to those who know more about the
> subject, but I am having a hard time finding a direct answer.
>
> If I buy a CD and lend it to a friend to liste
|
|
|
"Music Laws" <frikker@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I buy a CD and lend it to a friend to listen to, this is not
> illegal.
> If I burn a copy of this CD and lend it to a friend to listen to,
> is this illegal?
Right. You can copy a CD that you have pu
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:18:54 -0500, "Music Laws" <frikker@gmail.com>
wrote:
>If I buy a CD and lend it to a friend to listen to, this is not
>illegal.
>If I burn a copy of this CD and lend it to a friend to listen to, is
>this illegal?
17 USC 10
|
|
|
In article <7cj8m2hcgejqp8n19t75igtpup9evn5fec@4ax.com>,
sandls816@gmail.com wrote:
> I was helping my friend move and accidentally hit a gutter on the side
> of the shed that was in the parking lot. Damage was very minimal,
> gutter has a small de
|
|
|
sandls816@gmail.com wrote:
> I was helping my friend move and accidentally hit a gutter on the side
> of the shed that was in the parking lot.
You hit it with what -- your friend's piano? Or your car? If the
latter you ought to get your car insurer
|
|
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:18:47 -0500 from <sandls816@gmail.com>:
[While moving a friend, you damaged a gutter. The owner wants $600,
you have contractor estimates for $50-$100.]
You are *not* obligated to pay the owner whatever the owner asks. You
*ar
|
|
|
In article <1cj8m253rphkj696vlig56ggqhc2bu788n@4ax.com>,
Tony Rayo <oshidori@gmail.com> wrote:
>Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>> According to wikipedia the first and second editions are not
>> available on the internet. But they can be purchased on CD
|
|
|
"Tony Rayo" <oshidori@gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as archivecdbooksusa.com, I never understood how they could
> offer what others couldn't, but especially charge for it.
They appear to be re-selling books, or if they are making copies they
are bo
|
|
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:18:13 -0500 from SpencerC
<keetongrant@hotmail.com>:
> Hey - A quick, yet not so simple law question. I have poured over the
> privacy act,
What did you pour over the act? Scotch? blood? cleaning fluid?
The word is "pored".
|
|
|
tns1 wrote:
> A couple of years ago I started getting dunning notices and legal papers
> sent to my address. The defendant's name is very similar to mine, 'Joe A
> Smith' vs 'Joe Z Smith'. I am not the guy named on these papers.
Probably dont need
|
|
|
jude wrote:
> At the age of around 80 or so, FIL finds out he needs to have his gall
> bladder out.
[doctors may have screwed up by nicking other organs with laser knife,
causing additional injury to FIL; OP is unclear whether this was
negligence o
|
|
|
My wife and I have been having problems, but we still decided to buy a
house together. Things are not working between us, and we're going to
get a divorce. The contractor is wanting to sue me for $3000 to $5000
because he is stating that that is his
|
|
|
Hey all,
So I figure I'd enlist your help and hopefully someone with some
knowledge or expertise will read and respond.
First, let me layout the situation:
I and a friend went to NYC for the day. We drove in together. We
met at a private
|
|
|
In article <eq69k2dcj196m8pv544ekaga7u2dl10ssj@4ax.com>,
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> In article <jro3k29tg74ciphi3nt441hitk0glslfs8@4ax.com>,
> Mike Anderson <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
> >Stan Brown wrote:
>
> >> If your le
|
|
|
In article <lbj8m25l4p7al8ob0l1f1i53t5b12omh3s@4ax.com>,
<kuacou241@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Regarding the aborted OJ Simpson "If I Did It" project (which,
>presumably, has largely been paid for by way of an advance), The
>Guardian says today: "In her stat
|
|
|
On Nov 22, 8:17 am, kuacou...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Regarding the aborted OJ Simpson "If I Did It" project (which,
> presumably, has largely been paid for by way of an advance), The
> Guardian says today: "In her statement, Regan makes an attempt to
>
|
|
|
kuacou241@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> The recipient of the funds knowing that the payment was in fraud of
> Simpson's creditors the Brown and Goldman families, isn't s/he
> susceptible to a successful fraudulent transfer action?
Well, maybe... especia
|
|
|
In article <ibj8m29qd63l7gk3s02gu1vbesdqg6ei42@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>> If the OP had guaranteed the reservation with AmEx, and had gone
>> to another hotel to get a roo
|
|
|
Techhead <jorgenson.b@gmail.com> wrote:
> My soon-to-be-wife was recently divorced back in June. WI. law
> states there is a 6 month waiting period to re-marry. If we get
> married in Dec. of this year (after the 6 month wait), do we
> file our t
|
|
|
I am not a lawyer. But I have an IRS 1040 Form instructions in
front of me.
>My soon-to-be-wife was recently divorced back in June. WI. law states
>there is a 6 month waiting period to re-marry. If we get married in
>Dec. of this year (after the 6
|
|
|
"Techhead" <jorgenson.b@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gbj8m21m0edhdsqgava2q09hba50un6ncl@4ax.com...
> My soon-to-be-wife was recently divorced back in June. WI. law states
> there is a 6 month waiting period to re-marry. If we get married in
> Dec
|
|
|
In article <gbj8m21m0edhdsqgava2q09hba50un6ncl@4ax.com>,
Techhead <jorgenson.b@gmail.com> wrote:
>My soon-to-be-wife was recently divorced back in June. WI. law states
>there is a 6 month waiting period to re-marry. If we get married in
>Dec. of this
|
|
|
Techhead wrote:
> If my fiance was married, then divorced, then re-marrys in the same tax
> year, how would she file?
This one is easy. In case of a divorce during the year, your marital
status on December 31 determines your tax filing status.
|
|
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:17:13 -0500 from Techhead
<jorgenson.b@gmail.com>:
> My soon-to-be-wife was recently divorced back in June. WI. law states
> there is a 6 month waiting period to re-marry. If we get married in
> Dec. of this year (after the 6 mont
|
|
|
In article <ebj8m2p5sd4u5get9ckj3helbdpc60ckh8@4ax.com>,
luvmywife321@gmail.com wrote:
> I'd like to create a website with his company name, and using it to
> show what he's done and not done. Documented factual items only, but
> that covers quite
|
|
|
luvmywife321@gmail.com wrote:
> I hired a contractor to build a home addition. He made many changes
> and substitutions and also left a good bit of finish work undone. We
> came to the punch list point. I presented him with a punch list and
> inc
|
|
|
blunted1@hotmail.com wrote:
[Suicidally violent neighhor torched own house before shot by cops,
caused smoke damage to OP's house, which was paid for by OP's own
insurer minus $500 deductible.]
> The property value left to the estate is worth
> o
|
|
|
Hey Everybuddy,
I was just wondering if anyone has any legal (or otherwise) experience
in dealing with being the executor for a recently deceased loved one?
My dad died last night and one of my brothers is already trying get
his hands on all my dad
|
|
|
on 11/22/2006 5:16 AM David Chesler said the following:
>
> The detectors are not at the entrance, only the exit. I try to be
> very careful at the entrance, especially if I'm returning mechandise,
> to follow the rules and to be seen on video.
|
|
|
on 11/22/2006 5:16 AM Barry Gold said the following:
> John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
>> Uhhh, I agree that there is an element of psychology. But I don't think
>> you have a right to refuse the inspection. Perhaps they are not willing
>>
|
|
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:16:30 -0500 from Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net>:
> I can only answer for California. In CA, the store's employees may
> not detain you without probable cause. Refusal to submit to an
> inspection is _not_ probably cause.
Do you hav
|
|
|
In article <bifek2tadibd0t9gbmafgjorp8715djt0m@4ax.com>,
"hdj" <hendrikdejong@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I've sold my car about 6 months ago. Now the ex girlfriend of the guy I
> sold it to tells me that the person I sold it to never registered the
> car
|
|
|
swap wrote:
> I had this car mishap a few days back. Imagine a T intersection between
> the gate of my apartment complex and the road. I was waiting at the
> gate trying to make a right turn .. I was watching out for the traffic
> coming from the left
|
|
|
In article <saj8m29g3a1j4ik1m738kh0poluhcion2q@4ax.com>,
donman1985@yahoo.com wrote:
> My question is if my dad dies, can my step mom kick me out of the
> house? If she decides to sell do I get some of the proceeds? What is my
> right on the house?
|
|
|
donman1985@yahoo.com wrote:
> I have a question about my right to live in the house or ownership
> portion. I live in California.
>
> I was adopted since I was an infant and been living in my adopted
> parents' house since. My parents never charge
|
|
|
>I have a question about my right to live in the house or ownership
>portion. I live in California.
I am not a lawyer.
>I was adopted since I was an infant and been living in my adopted
>parents' house since. My parents never charged me a rent. My
|
|
|
donman1985@yahoo.com wrote:
> I have a question about my right to live in the house or ownership
> portion. I live in California.
You don't give us enough information to answer the question in your
subject header. What matters is what your Dad put
|
