|
|
<rwh.midway@gmail.com> wrote:
> ....
>
> Most importantly, under this legal formulation, Taiwan becomes the
> sixth major overseas territory of the USA. Moreover, the Taiwanese
> can have everything they really want -- a new constitution, new flag
|
|
|
rwh.midway@gmail.com wrote:
> According to the customary laws of warfare, CKS
> accepted the surrender of Japanese troops on behalf of the Allies, but
> the ensuing military occupation of Taiwan was conducted on behalf of
> the "conqueror" and "princi
|
|
|
In article <e09bm2l8ecc4libhmbjflcqi1rbtecg3qt@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 22, 8:19 am, Joe Lauton <J...@Lauton2000.com> wrote:
>
>> One can not shout fire in a theater etc.
>
>Not quite true. One cannot FALS
|
|
|
"CP" <cptrout@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6l0pm253b2ob0on7kku99htov29n8miv2v@4ax.com...
>I live in a great neighborhood in a nice city in So. Cal.
> A Registered Sex Offender has recently moved in to the house next door.
> Let's say I decide a
|
|
|
A registered sex offender ("RSO") moved in next to OP, CP, who was
moved to write:
> If I [decide to sell my house and] am unable to sell at what
> the market value [would be without the RSO] can I sue him
> for the dollar difference of what the marke
|
|
|
CP <cptrout@gmail.com> wrote:
>I live in a great neighborhood in a nice city in So. Cal.
>A Registered Sex Offender has recently moved in to the house next door.
>Let's say I decide at some point to sell my house.
>I have to believe that my property's
|
|
|
CP wrote:
> I live in a great neighborhood in a nice city in So. Cal.
> A Registered Sex Offender has recently moved in to the house next door.
> Let's say I decide at some point to sell my house.
> I have to believe that my property's value and it's
|
|
|
on 11/28/2006 10:41 AM tns1 said the following:
> rick++ wrote:
>> tns1 wrote:
>>
>>> A couple of years ago I started getting dunning notices and legal papers
>>> sent to my address. The defendant's name is very similar to mine, 'Joe A
>>> Smith' vs
|
|
|
"tns1" <tns1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:2l0pm296thptaqt2ok0q0h07a6fvvifod5@4ax.com...
> Its just that I have been told by an atty that I could have assets
> seized even if it isn't my name on the judgement, and that plantiff
> would not even have
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> Dick Adams <rdadams@smart.net> wrote:
>> That reads a lot like: "I'll work for you, but you pay the money to
>> my mistress so I appear to be unemployed and can justify to the court
>> that I am unable to ma
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Dick Adams <rdadams@smart.net> wrote:
>
>>That reads a lot like: "I'll work for you, but you pay the money
>>to my mistress so I appear to be unemployed and can justify to the
>>court that I am unable to mak
|
|
|
In article <jbj8m2l712vj5ejolud6se1866gi1i8b1f@4ax.com>,
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>With torts you take the victim as you find him, and pay for all damages
>caused by your actions.
>
>But in contracts you are only required
|
|
|
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:41:50 -0500, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
wrote:
>>> What if a non member store, Fry's was one
>>> example given, posts a conspicuous sign at the entrance that says:...
>>> "...you agree to display a receipt for merchand
|
|
|
lrbtav@gmail.com wrote:
> Do employers generally take dismissals seriously even
> though all charges have been dropped? Even though I was not convicted
> of anything I am still worried 'arrested with dismissal' will present
> me with employment comp
|
|
|
In article <nk0pm296bbjej3ugj7cajquv9hf84o3t7c@4ax.com>,
"RacyStang" <RacyStang@FlatAcreFarms.com> wrote:
> I'm being sued in small claims court. The plaintiff and I were doing
> business as corporations (he is incorporated and I'm and LLC). Howev
|
|
|
On Nov 28, 1:41 pm, "RacyStang" <RacySt...@FlatAcreFarms.com> wrote:
> I'm being sued in small claims court. The plaintiff and I were doing
> business as corporations (he is incorporated and I'm and LLC). However,
> when he sued he sued me personall
|
|
|
"RacyStang" <RacyStang@FlatAcreFarms.com> wrote:
> I'm being sued in small claims court. The plaintiff and I were
> doing business as corporations (he is incorporated and I'm and
> LLC). However, when he sued he sued me personally. Technically,
>
|
|
|
RacyStang wrote:
> I'm being sued in small claims court. The plaintiff and I were doing
> business as corporations (he is incorporated and I'm and LLC).
First, I don't know MI law.
The way you phrased that I''m assuming this LLC is basically your
|
|
|
RacyStang <RacyStang@FlatAcreFarms.com> wrote:
>I'm being sued in small claims court. The plaintiff and I were doing
>business as corporations (he is incorporated and I'm and LLC). However,
>when he sued he sued me personally. Technically, he and I
|
|
|
Hi, all.
Here is the situation.
A woman has a teenage daugter from a previous marriage.
She marries a man, and has two children by him.
The first of these children was given his surname, which she also took
when she married him. Perfectly sen
|
|
|
Background: There are two adjacent property owners, A and
B. Without seeking permission or providing advance
notification, A has a gate installed on his property which
attaches to a wall on B's property. B points out that this
was done without hi
|
|
