|
|
The doctor is a close relative (and much older than me) who, over the
years have been spreading news that I have bi-polar disorder. I came
to find out only in the year 2004. The doctor received the medical
degree at age 42 and have no specilized traini
|
|
|
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:07:41 -0400 from Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com>:
> How do states determine that certain offenses are to be decided by
> only a judge, or even just an arbitrator (like parking tickets), when
> the 6th amendment gives us the right to a
|
|
|
Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
[quoting me]
>
>> ..... Most cities have made it very difficult
>> to challenge a ticket, especially a parking ticket. They basically
>> regard it as a means of collecting money, rather than as something
>> whe
|
|
|
Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
> How do states determine that certain offenses are to
> be decided by only a judge, or even just an arbitrator
> (like parking tickets), when the 6th amendment gives
> us the right to a jury trial for any crimina
|
|
|
On Sep 11, 7:07 am, Stan <stanle...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Another interesting point on this. A TV news reporter caught the
> employees of a Manhattan parking garage is a residential area parking
> customer cars onto the street as soon as the street cl
|
|
|
"Robert M. Gary" <N7093v@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>> Is that new? I've done a lot of California probates but never
>> come up against that before. Here's the current form for Petition
>> for Probate.
|
|
|
On Sep 11, 7:07 am, jcyeo...@gmail.com wrote:
> However, both the plantiff and the respondent are very risk adverse.
> They agree that if the claimant wins, the respondent will not have to
> pay more than $5 million, regardless of what the jury award
|
|
|
On Sep 11, 7:07 am, jcyeo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Assume that the claimant has offered to settle for $5 million and the
> respondent has offered to settle for $2 million. Therefore they
> cannot reach a settlement and they proceed to trial.
* * *
> T
|
|
|
David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Stuart Bronstein wrote:
>> The theory is that normally reaction time to brake is one second.
>> And the car in front of you will take some distance to stop,
>> which is approximately what your car w
|
|
|
In article <m735e3lr7qf1jjkoc7kt6f51m257ie5pvf@4ax.com>,
Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>In article <qnovd3d1oaf0ntehcvhtc1im32fja03hi6@4ax.com>,
>Vlad <volenin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Let's say I bought a DVD (eg, "Terminator I") e
|
|
|
In article <bn5td39ejo0cqkd9mstk4e2r46kiv4r64m@4ax.com>,
grendal <im_gumby@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 3, 6:06 am, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>> In article <nnl2d3dk4b6ghfifkjk1ikh9ietkunn...@4ax.com>,
>> grendal <im_gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
|
|
|
In article <tmtce3tk73jotuus5mm7agb2s9nrhgkhfb@4ax.com>,
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>There was the famous case of Dmitri Skylarov, but he made the mistake
>of coming to the US after having worked on software that arguably
>violated 17-1201.
|
|
|
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:07:37 -0400, bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
>Remember that the US is not the only source of software
>in the world, and that software can be bought (or given away) over an
>Internet that is more global every day.
True.
|
|
|
bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
> Or the defendant might hire a lawyer (perhaps with the aid of the
> EFF) to argue the case to a jury -- the prosecutor could come out
> looking mighty silly arguing to a jury,
> "Yes, the law allows the defend
|
|
|
In article <qmtce3ptb2rtcsj3kv871s61ot55hg5e2i@4ax.com>,
<hifi239@gmail.com> wrote:
>To cut to the chase, below is the bylaw in my Massachusetts town. The
>title excludes single and two-family structures from this particular
>law. Is the title lega
|
|
|
On 11 Sep 2007, hifi239@gmail.com wrote:
> [B]elow is [a portion of a] bylaw in my Massachusetts
> town. The title excludes single and two-family structures
> from this particular law. Is the title legally part of the
> law, or just considered inf
|
|
|
hifi239@gmail.com writes:
> To cut to the chase, below is the bylaw in my Massachusetts town. The
> title excludes single and two-family structures from this particular
> law. Is the title legally part of the law, or just considered
> informationa
|
|
|
On Sep 11, 7:07 am, hifi...@gmail.com wrote:
> To cut to the chase, below is the bylaw in my Massachusetts town. The
> title excludes single and two-family structures from this particular
> law. Is the title legally part of the law, or just considere
|
|
|
Suppose the primary beneficiaries are Persons A (50%) and B (50%).
How can I specify the contingent beneficiaries to have the following
effect:
(a) If only A has died, then B (50%), A1 (25%) and A2 (25%)
(b) If only B has died, then A (50%), B1 (2
|
|
|
On Sep 5, 7:46 am, dav1936531 <dav1936...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> My State, Michigan, has fouled it's Circuit Court rules of civil
> procedure. The "one form" of civil procedure in the State has now
> become two: 1) due process, and 2) due process "lit
|
|
|
"Barry Gold" <bgold@nyx.net> wrote in message
news:omtce390kaqbt00kurkpui7mi9rl5tt4a5@4ax.com...
> But if the estate were larger, over $2M, then it would probably be
> better for the beneficiary/executor/trustee to charge a fee -- the
> income tax
|
|
|
In article <0a6rd3db685o7a4q46afrtkgej8scq5t2s@4ax.com>,
henri <henri@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:06:04 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>>In article <o5e8c394hokfquatv91v4vtp53m1cqc77f@4ax.com>,
>>Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexr
|
|
|
Hello. A couple of years back I pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge in
the state of Texas. At that time I was given a deferred adjudication
which I completed successfully. Though I was not a US citizen or Green
card holder at that time, neither the j
|
|
|
ymg200 <ymg200@excite.com> wrote:
>I want to start a website which goal would be civil rights advocacy.
>The website will be providing information/news and analysis. I want to
>register the company for this purpose and I need an advice how to
>struct
|
|
|
On Sep 11, 7:07 am, ymg200 <ymg...@excite.com> wrote:
> I want to start a website which goal would be civil rights advocacy.
> The website will be providing information/news and analysis.
If you step over the line from providing information into prov
|
|
|
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:07:33 -0400, ymg200 <ymg200@excite.com> wrote:
>I want to start a website which goal would be civil rights advocacy.
>The website will be providing information/news and analysis. I want to
>register the company for this purpose
|
|
|
ymg200 <ymg200@excite.com> wrote:
> I want to start a website which goal would be civil rights
> advocacy. The website will be providing information/news and
> analysis. I want to register the company for this purpose and I
> need an advice how to s
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I've just joined the corporate retirement plan (New York State), and
> designated a non-profit corporation as my beneficiary.
>
> My HR department has no problem with that, but the pension plan
>
|
|
|
bgold@nyx3.nyx.net (Barry Gold) writes:
>I'm interested in what a state and/or locality might theoretically do
>if there's a law at a higher level that they disagree with.
If it's a duly adopted federal law, they can petition the Government
for a
|
|
