misc.legal.moderated

In article <jcrse39ohpvs4ai565bqd0jglrj0rh0kut@4ax.com>, Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote: >In article <qb4qe3h36d1mqish8ercr196gv1t3nh77s@4ax.com>, >Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: >>In article <70ine3dcjjksohl43v87j7an1vnuddni4e@4ax.c

grendal <im_gumby@hotmail.com> wrote: > (Robert Bonomi) wrote: >> Grok <bwilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >If I move a relative into an apartment dwelling that is >> >non-conforming or illegal (i.e.-not being used in accordance >> >with the Cer

In article <gcrse3dvdgfjpbdn0ba62b1prd614khol3@4ax.com>, Boothbay <harri85274@aol.com> wrote: >I made a will with a lawyer a few years ago. About 2 years ago I had >to remove a person that was to recieve money, due to death...and of >course I was cha

On Sep 17, 7:08 am, Boothbay <harri85...@aol.com> wrote: > I made a will with a lawyer a few years ago. About 2 years ago I had > to remove a person that was to recieve money, due to death...and of > course I was charged for that also. Now again I have

"Boothbay" <harri85274@aol.com> wrote in message news:gcrse3dvdgfjpbdn0ba62b1prd614khol3@4ax.com... >I made a will with a lawyer a few years ago. About 2 years ago I had > to remove a person that was to recieve money, due to death...and of > course I

Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:08:39 -0400 from Boothbay <harri85274@aol.com>: > I made a will with a lawyer a few years ago. About 2 years ago I had > to remove a person that was to recieve money, due to death...and of > course I was charged for that also. Now a

The common law for debtor/creditor disputes arising from single transactions seems well-matured/stable ? For transactions-to-perpetutity one is dealing with a moving target. IRS [tax authorities] I guess would be such an example. Although tax leg

This story begins a few months when my brother got on a very stupid car accident. He was getting ready to make a right turn but the light was red and he couldn't see the incoming traffic very well because there was a semi sitting to his left covering h

Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:08:36 -0400 from Rich Carreiro <rlc- news@rlcarr.com>: > Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> writes: > > > > Also, if the state claims that a traffic violation isn't > > > a crime, then the 7th amendment gives us the right to

David, >A gentleman of Asian background applied to a Massachusetts clerk- > magistrate on a criminal case of harassment. He claimed that the > other party spit (on his own property) and swerved in the road, almost > crossing the yellow center lin

In article <bcrse35vb61av2k4l5bs556ub44jcrcgks@4ax.com>, Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote: >David Ames wrote: >> A gentleman of Asian background applied to a Massachusetts clerk- >> magistrate on a criminal case of harassment. He

I'm considering publishing a listing of craft and art shows in Michigan. There are already three other publications that I'm aware of that do this. All three claim to be copyrighted. I think I can do a better job of marketing then they are doing. But

In article <9crse3p004mt8lbod01um4pp38u2a4a3kf@4ax.com>, John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu> wrote: >I have also heard of a high-low agreement contingent on the result >of an appeal. I don't know why the parties didn't settle for a >fixed sum. Maybe they b

I have a question regarding if a rescission of an apartment lease is possible under the following circumstances: On Saturday September 15, 2007 I had planned on moving into the a new apartment. I entered the apartment in the evening to find the place

In article <ubrse3dk8e8mmkagcvqrd22gdchmii65nk@4ax.com>, Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote: >As of Sunday night, OJ Simpson is being held without bail in Las Vegas >for the alleged armed robbery and burgulary incident at the Palace >Station on Frida

Stan wrote: > The question I have is the legal implications if bail is set and is > posted. So far, he's managed to shield most of his assets from Fred > Goldman, but if he posts bail, won't that now be a cash asset and > subject to seizure when it

Stan wrote: > So far, he's managed to shield most of his assets from Fred > Goldman, but if he posts bail, won't that now be a cash asset and > subject to seizure when it would otherwise be returned to OJ? > > So, how does OJ post bail, or even rais

On Sep 17, 8:08 am, Stan <stanle...@hotmail.com> wrote: > As of Sunday night, OJ Simpson is being held without bail in Las Vegas > for the alleged armed robbery and burgulary incident at the Palace > Station on Friday. > > The question I have is th

The contractor will shortly be completing the job. He has agreed that I pay the check-cashing company directly. Hopefully, last few questions for the lively discussion. 1. The check-cashing company has already reported this to the collection agenc

In article <pbrse3h9igie46qg3j3sd4cmf3i3hvf4ke@4ax.com>, Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote: >> Does it help if you notify the original payee that you've >> stopped payment? > >No, it

>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:55:58 -0400 from Stuart Bronstein ><spamtrap@lexregia.com>: >> The law says that a third party cashing the check, if he did not know >> about your claim that the work was not completed, is a "holder in due >> course." In that

On Sep 17, 8:07 am, Stuart Bronstein <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote: > > Does it help if you notify the original payee that you've > > stopped payment? > > No, it would only help if you notified the check cashing company > before they actually cashe

On Sep 16, 7:21 am, David Chesler <ches...@post.harvard.edu> wrote: > Does it help if you notify the original payee that you've stopped > payment? I guess it would help the claim against the payee (changing it > from depending on whether the work

In article <fbrse3d7og3tq55dqbksa9o5p6mnh80lp1@4ax.com>, Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >The laws allowing a fair-use copy allow for a COPY of the work, not a >knock-off "looks kinda like the original if you squint your eyes just >right."

In article <hbrse3dmiph9tqlo6p2jlp8vqqb0j2b8he@4ax.com>, Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >Fair-use law says you can make a copy. Not a "kinda, sorta, might look >the same if squinting hard enough" but a full copy. No, it doesn't. Fair-us

Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> writes: > The laws allowing a fair-use copy allow for a COPY of the work, not a Well, that's the key (and something I've never been sure about). Is the "fair use" doctrine judge-made or statutory? And if judge-ma

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:07:38 -0400, Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: >Restricting the right is one thing. Making it totally useless is another.... > >Fair-use law says you can make a copy. Not a "kinda, sorta, might look >the same if squinti

Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: > Stuart Bronstein wrote: >> There are all kinds of "rights" we have that are restricted in >> some way. We have the right to travel wherever we want, but not >> the right to trespass on someone else's propert

Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: > The laws allowing a fair-use copy allow for a COPY of the work, > not a knock-off "looks kinda like the original if you squint your > eyes just right." > Does the law prohibit me from setting up a printing

sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: > Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote: >>sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote: > >>> I can if it's Fair Use, and that's precisely when I do have the >>> right to make that copy. >> >>What kind of fair use? If you

In article <dbrse39l2mret8iue7iqtqr13fqmoitn8k@4ax.com>, Seth <sethb@panix.com> wrote: >In article <1b4qe39e2j1521ire9q650po2ppvr1ruhs@4ax.com>, >Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote: > >>The charges weren't unauthorized, however (at least not from

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:27:14 -0400, "Mark A" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: ><wondering6@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:e49ie31per1adgdpu4d1onj14gpmik159p@4ax.com... >> We have an attorney who has represented our church for years - mostly >> just

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:07:23 -0400, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote: > >In fact there never was such a schism, but if there were, what would >a court do? > >Someone would have to decide which of the two daughter corporations >owne

On Sep 17, 8:07 am, Stan Brown <the_stan_br...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > When I was a kid, I belonged to a particularly sectarian Lutheran > congregation. The church's constitution (and presumably its articles > of incorporation, at least by reference) con

[Mike Jacobs noted that secular courts "will have nothing to say whatsoever" about canonical matters. Stan Brown notes that his childhood church had a provision in its founding documents granting the church property to the true believers in any dispute

============================================================ Oral argument previews: Prepared by the liibulletin editorial board: < http://www.law.cornell.edu/bulletin/board_current.htm > =====================================================