|
|
Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:03:13 -0400 from Jobeth66 <amy.daley@gmail.com>:
> On Sep 29, 1:32 pm, John <john.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have a question about the 5th amendment and "unlawful detainment" by
> > airlines. This may sound frivolous but to those
|
|
|
On Sep 29, 6:32 am, John <john.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a question about the 5th amendment and "unlawful detainment" by
> airlines. This may sound frivolous but to those of us who have been
> through it, I assure you it is not.
>
> My questio
|
|
|
Jobeth66 wrote:
> On Sep 29, 1:32 pm, John <john.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a question about the 5th amendment and "unlawful detainment" by
>> airlines. This may sound frivolous but to those of us who have been
>> through it, I assure you it is
|
|
|
"Jobeth66" <amy.daley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:sc3vf3p35631nm0kii9jn803lfjhrqf99l@4ax.com...
| On Sep 29, 1:32 pm, John <john.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
| > I have a question about the 5th amendment and "unlawful detainment" by
| > airlines. Thi
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:32:57 -0400, John <john.s396@gmail.com> wrote:
>I have a question about the 5th amendment and "unlawful detainment" by
>airlines. This may sound frivolous but to those of us who have been
>through it, I assure you it is not.
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> On Sep 26, 7:22 am, Mike <prabb...@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>> Mike Jacobs wrote:
>>> if you have already allowed the earlier statute to expire before
>>> you found out about this distinction, you have nothing to lose by
>>> filin
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> First, let's be clear that I'm not advocating OP file suit in any
> court on a claim he knows is invalid. That would be improper.
>
> But we're talking about a situation where there may be a basis to
>
|
|
|
===
[Revised 1 August 2005]
MISC.LEGAL.MODERATED POSTING INSTRUCTIONS
1. Posting should be done in the ordinary manner by using news
software. DO NOT MAIL POSTINGS TO THE MODERATOR. If you can't post using news
softw
|
|
|
Dear Perplexed,
You read somewhere that MasterCard is sending credit cards to holders
of dormant Macy's accounts. You called Macy's and were told that
yours was one of those accounts. You are concerned about possible
theft of a credit card from y
|
|
|
Perplexed wrote:
[thinks he is sent credit card he doesn't want. Not at home now]
>
> So, what is the recourse????
>
When you get home, don't activate the card. Cut in half and then go
peaceably on with your life.
-paul
ianal
|
|
|
Perplexed,
You believe that Mastercard may have sent you a solicitation. You fear
theft of your mail and thus theft of your ID resulting in a credit card in
the possession of a stranger. You ask for advice.
Do a credit check. I think all 3 m
|
|
|
"Perplexed" <nellplotts@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:jc3vf3tr98mh9vbdvp20n1c97lu2pkhpnk@4ax.com...
> Yesterday I noticed a news item that said that Macy's had given
> information about dormant accounts to Mastercard, then Mastercard is
> sending
|
|
|
In article <1sdsf39moi8p25p93c70nkl3v43f319326@4ax.com>,
<rterp99@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hi there,
>We purchased a newly built house about 10 months ago in a community
>where the houses are very close together. We recently noticed
>problems with our vi
|
|
|
Jonathan Sachs wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:32:10 -0400, rterp99@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> We recently noticed... our vinyl siding... becoming warped.
>> builder... said it was from our next door neighbor's 2'x2' windows
>> which in the afternoon r
|
|
|
In article <8c3vf3p93uod8amg1rj3nlnuua3n3l066q@4ax.com>,
Willie Wills <WillieWills010178@cox.net> wrote:
>Watching an ER show, makes me wonder about a twist, where the family is
>refusing treatment for a wealthy unconscious Dad. The Dr's claim they
|
|
|
In article <8c3vf3p93uod8amg1rj3nlnuua3n3l066q@4ax.com>,
Willie Wills <WillieWills010178@cox.net> wrote:
> Watching an ER show, makes me wonder about a twist, where the family is
> refusing treatment for a wealthy unconscious Dad. The Dr's claim th
|
|
|
On Sep 30, 7:02 am, Willie Wills <WillieWills010...@cox.net> wrote:
> Watching an ER show, makes me wonder about a twist, where the family is
> refusing treatment for a wealthy unconscious Dad. The Dr's claim they
> can save the Dad, but the kids say n
|
|
|
Willie Wills <WillieWills010178@cox.net> wrote:
> Watching an ER show, makes me wonder about a twist, where the
> family is refusing treatment for a wealthy unconscious Dad. The
> Dr's claim they can save the Dad, but the kids say no. Would
> there
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:31:59 -0400, mmsbandaid@gmail.com wrote:
[A business mistakenly printed OP's phone number on its bills, and OP
is getting a lot of calls meant for the company. OP notified the
company but it has not corrected the problem.]
|
|
|
In article <prdsf396ev8u4tmngs05ffrlmi02l4c6q4@4ax.com>,
Robert M. Gary <N7093v@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 27, 4:50 am, bon...@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>
>> If you build more than _three_hundred_feet_ above the highest point in the
|
|
|
In article <prdsf396ev8u4tmngs05ffrlmi02l4c6q4@4ax.com>,
Robert M. Gary <N7093v@gmail.com> wrote:
>Your questions are addressed by Title 14 section 77 of U.S. federal
>regulation. Basically the FAA has control of *all* navigatable
>airspace in the U
|
|
