|
|
> >OK: is it recorded in the legal literature that/how/why the
> >fundamental difference of the 'structures' between single &
> >'continuing to perpetuity' transactions -- analagous to
> >maths calculations which were only able to be done after
> >in
|
|
|
Can someone please authoritatively answer this question?: If I went
to my local (Southern California, in my case) police station what
kinds of information must I be given access to upon request?
For example, many times in local newspapers reports w
|
|
|
mm wrote:
> Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>>What was described is an informal trust. There is no
>>documentation except the bank records saying that it is X's
>>account "in trust for
>
> No, no, the trust document is several
|
|
|
On Oct 16, 5:45 am, mm <NOPSAMmm2...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:41:15 -0400, Stuart Bronstein
> <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
> >mm wrote:
> >> Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>
> >>>I think that while the trustee is alive, he's the e
|
|
|
On Oct 16, 5:45 am, mm <NOPSAMmm2...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:41:15 -0400, Stuart Bronstein
> <spamt...@lexregia.com> wrote:
> >mm wrote:
> >> Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>
> >>>I think that while the trustee is alive, he's the e
|
|
|
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:45:46 -0400, David Briggman <briggman@gmail.com> wrote:
>I seem to have uncovered something that, according to the Virginia
>State Bar, has never been complained of here in Virginia - by an
>attorney or otherwise.
Perhaps t
|
|
|
David,
You believe that State employees may not file pleadings if they are not
attorneys or pro se litigants. You are specifically concerned with the
agency that prosecutes delinquent child support cases. . You do believe that
the State AG app
|
|
|
In article <ru19h35qqetefl3hu5g0qc1c5clnpou8i9@4ax.com>,
Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Especially in the first case, if the former owner had sold the
>mortgage, the new mortgage holder could care less what the two of you
>thought you were ag
|
|
|
"Alan" <alanb_lano2spam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:l2e1h3loenvhaggq0aofa1fc9umft9uclf@4ax.com...
> I was in an identical position with a house I inherited from my
grandmother.
> I got insurance, then sold it to the tenant with all the proper
|
|
|
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>babypink2807@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>[claims auto crash with soft tissue injury]
>>
>> I was wondering what is the ball park region I would be looking at as
>> a financial settlement as I am
|
|
|
Hello,
A couple years ago I got involved with a woman who turned out to be an
illegal alien (she overstayed her tourist visa).
Our relationship has been off and on for the past couple of years. Last
month she came forward that she is pregnant wi
|
|
|
<billyg404@aol.com> wrote:
[OP gave two weeks written notice of resignation. His employer told
him to leave immediately. OP's supervisor claims this is OP's fault.
OP wants to know his rights under GA law.]
Most states are "employment at will". T
|
|
|
wrote:
> I RECENTLY HANDED IN A TWO WEEK NOTICE IN THE FORM OF A WRITTEN
> LETTER OF RESIGNATION AS REQUIRED BY THE COMPANY IN THE EMPLOYEE
> MANUAL. UPON RECEIVING MY LETTER MY EMPLOYER TOLD ME THAT I WAS NO
> LONGER NEEDED AND I SHOULD LEAVE AND N
|
|
|
Billy,
You handed in 2 weeks notice of your resignation. The company escorted
you off the premises immediately. You ask if the company must pay you for
the final 2 weeks. This happened in Georgia.
Probably not but you can easily call the loc
|
|
|
On Oct 16, 5:45 am, bg...@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote:
> <Meano.Cu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >So, does a single contact with a state - say, entering into a contract
> >- support specific personal jurisdiction when the cause of action
> >arises out of tha
|
|
|
On Oct 16, 4:45 am, Ronald <nospam.ron27...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[Discussing fax records on fraudulent contract]
> The thing is, no fax ever took place - they were never sent any faxes
> and no faxes were ever received from them. The forged contract
|
|
|
Ronald <nospam.ron27808@hotmail.com> wrote:
[discussion of fax and phone records snipped]
>The thing is, no fax ever took place - they were never sent any faxes
>and no faxes were ever received from them. The forged contract was made
>to look l
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:
> <Meano.Culpa@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>So, does a single contact with a state - say, entering into a
>>contract - support specific personal jurisdiction when the cause
>>of action arises out of that specific act? Yes. See McGee v. Int
|
|
|
In a book on trust administration, there is a statement: "All states
treat the domicile of the trustee (after the trustor's death) as the
administrative situs of the trust property".
Is this true, and if so what does it mean in practice? Suppose th
|
|
|
Seth wrote:
> In article <mih4h354at8aj9rj3qdh6savs34ounhqgf@4ax.com>,
> Steve Richter <StephenRichter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> a non fiction book I just read has a few paragraphs describing the
>> encounter and conversation between publicly known person
|
|
|
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:45:03 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>In article <mih4h354at8aj9rj3qdh6savs34ounhqgf@4ax.com>,
>Steve Richter <StephenRichter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>a non fiction book I just read has a few paragraphs describing the
>>enco
|
|
|
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:45:03 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>If the conversation took place between A and B, then they are the
>owners of the copyright on that conversation. The copyright on the
>description of the encounter is owned by whoeve
|
|
|
I've been Googling everywhere to find an answer to my dilemma. Then I
recalled getting some excellent advice many years ago from this group
on a different legal issue.
I'm a 51 year old college student. I transferred to one of these "box
top" Acce
|
|
|
"jinpa" <jharno@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:kih4h39im88k3jhebsanh1iahvvap9fgl2@4ax.com...
> Does anyone know what the procedure is in Pennsylvania (I assume it
> varies by state) for changing a trust trustee? My wife has a trust
> that is a
|
|
|
Hi,
I got a VP job at a bank. They are doing a background investigation of me.
First of all, there are some gaps in my employment. Last year, I took a
job and was fired after three months. Basically, there was a mismatch
between how I should have d
|
|