|
|
>>>> The rules of stare decisis are complicated, but the bottom
>>>> line is that the highest court in the land is bound by
>>>> precedent only to the extent it determines it needs to be.
>> Note that Stu said this liberty applies only to the _highes
|
|
|
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:03:35 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>In article <gdauh319mhk6r86pvjv8mqvkvbobhhhp88@4ax.com>,
>henri <henri@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:36:53 -0400, sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>>>In article <sk3ph3t
|
|
|
pparently continuing to dance around -- that is, to choose to avoid
reporting specifically -- whatever it is that bothers her about how
authorities in or near the Pa. county in which she used to reside with
her elderly mother (who, the OP seems also t
|
|
|
On Oct 26, 7:03 am, Paul Cassel <pcasselremo...@comremovecast.net>
wrote:
> How many have ever been prosecuted? I've never heard of a single one
> much less encountered it. Have you? Has any who say this is a criminal
> activity actually seen the ge
|
|
|
I had thought people were being paranoid, if only slightly, by
using elaborate disclaimers. I usually use some kind of unambiguous
statement similar to such disclaimers, although I am not (yet) a lawyer.
Apparently, it's easier to get in trouble
|
|
|
Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>Well, bread isn't a fermented beverage to begin with so that doesn't
>matter. I was simply pointing out the cooking-out of the alcohol to let
>folks know why they don't get drunk from it. But I still think the
|
|
|
On Oct 26, 7:03 am, fjbl...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Well, turn the situation around. Suppose that your employer is paying
> your insurance bills. Do you think they should be able to find out
> what you're being treated for? Seems like it would be a recip
|
|
|
In article <5bi3i39hd674sjolih4dtv1r8q2l6kkd6e@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 25, 7:14 am, difdrum...@webtv.net (Bob Young) wrote:
>
>> Can the parents of a teenage boy legally be made to pay child support
>> for
|
|
|
Digit,
Some people who can't afford private attorneys to act
> as their representatives do however have the same courage to face
> these frightening certainties as well as their socioeconomic betters.
Have you looked for an attorney who will acc
|
|
|
Seth wrote:
> The mortgage is senior to the lease.
A mortgage is not always, by its nature, senior to a lease. It has
priority generally because it occurs first. It also has priority
because it is generally recorded while a lease is generally
|
|
|
Robert M. Gary wrote:
> She's already done that and I can see some information on line but
> the acutal bills that come to the house do not show what is
> billed.
Wouldn't they have to prove what services they performed if they sued
you for the
|
|
|
Jonathan Sachs wrote:
> Do the speakers have a copyright in the conversation? If it was
> not intentionally created as a work of authorship, I think not.
I haven't gone to research it either. But it seems to me that the
creator would have right
|
|
|
On Oct 25, 7:14 am, mm <NOPSAMmm2...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> My car insurance company won't take payments for more than six months
> and won't take payments in advance.
In advance of what? Every insurance company AFAIK wants its premiums
paid in a
|
|
