|
|
On Nov 15, 8:12 am, "johnmoli...@yahoo.com" <johnmoli...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> I am a 100% stock shareholder in an S-corp. The company went out of
> business due to economic conditions. It has no physical assets and
> $500 in the bank. That's it.
>
>
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> kastnna <kast...@auburnalum.org> wrote:
>> Mike Jacobs <mjacobs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Yes. The law of your state will determine this. Why don't
>> > foax tell the group where they are? Laws diffe
|
|
|
how to assess risk of being evicted from a rental house, before
signing a lease?
There was a thread recently about the apparent rise in
"immediate evictions" of tenants who were renting houses
from owners who were foreclosed on (what's the right wor
|
|
|
The web has opened up amazing communications possibilities, both good
and bad (WebMD vs. Spam). I wonder where the line is drawn, per a
previous post: Assume state A in the US for instance, makes posting
some specific information a crime, (or send
|
|
|
My brother, who is 24, threw a football party the other night. Several
people there were under 21 and were drinking (they are teenagers
18-20). The cops came to tell him to keep the noise down, saw the
liquor, and to make a long story short 15 people u
|
|
|
In article <j2drj3hkktvm3rdjpdloec99amrikat68k@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>The odd twist in your hypo is that judgment was awarded for even more
>than the plaintiff asked for in his initial complaint.
In Massachusetts -- th
|
|
|
On Nov 17, 7:50 am, bon...@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
> Caveat: I have -not- seen the episode, arguing hypothetically.
> If one postulates that that _was_ an innocent, "non government actor" act, then
> when Zach volunteers the existe
|
|
|
I'm trying to determine whether I can get an injunction to prevent a
company from sending unordered merchandise (to anyone) as part of a
club membership when that consequence of membership isn't made known
(assuming the post office and FTC won't act).
|
|
|
Why can't the mother who caused the death of 13-year old Megan Meier by
posing as another 14-year old to spy on her neighbor be prosecuted in a
civil court?
And why couldn't the FBI recover the complete text of the MySpace posts
that were the cause
|
|
|
On Nov 16, 9:17 am, kastnna <kast...@auburnalum.org> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 7:11 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote:
>
> > Does this apply to distributions from afte[r]-tax contributions?
>
> After tax contributions would not be taxable. However AT contribs
|
|
|
On Nov 17, 7:49 am, Mike <prabb...@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
> That got me to wondering about another hypothetical. You take a
> photograph of a mountain. I take that picture and making a painting
> from it (not by tracing but by simply looking at the pi
|
|
|
My parents had an AB trust. When my father died, the trust
was divided into Survivor's and Decedent's trusts. Now I am
trying to understand all the related documentation, specifically
the trust document and my father's estate tax return (Form 706).
|
|
|
On Nov 17, 7:49 am, Mike Jacobs <mjacobs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 10:18 am, Stan <stanle...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > (As an aside, years ago an
> > insurance company executive advised that we should never reveal our
> > liability coverage;
|
|
|
SB> Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:17:20 -0500 from bat <bat@bats.com>:
??>> Company X has return policy that involves restocking fee for all
??>> returns.
??>>
??>> Customer orders an item by mail or from the web page, pays for the
??>> item and shipping
|
|
|
M> In part, it would depend on the terms of the sale. Many places
M> explicitly state on their website or eslewhere that such a refusal of
M> the package WOULD be considered a "return" and charged the fee.
Assuming the merchant does not mention rej
|
|
|
T> Well... the idea behind the restocking fee is that it costs them money
T> to cancel your order and put the item back on the shelf and this is
T> their payment. Those costs are the same regardless of whether or not
T> you opened the package befor
|
|
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 07:49:37 -0500, Mike <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com>
wrote:
>"...The resulting traced images are then
>usually coloured in, and re-photographed to create a new motion
>picture." and thus didn't seem to imply any added creative work
|
|
